摘要
目的了解松花粉和玉米蜂花粉作为饵料添加剂对黑胸散白蚁的诱食作用。方法以松木粉为基础饵料,添加不同浓度的松花粉和玉米蜂花粉,每种花粉设6个浓度（5%、10%、15%、20%、25%和30%）处理。利用四臂嗅觉仪测定2015年5月采集的黑胸散白蚁对各处理的嗅觉反应,并测定其连续10 d的取食量。结果黑胸散白蚁对含15%和25%松花粉的饵料具有负趋向性,对其他浓度松花粉的饵料具有正趋向性;对含20%、25%和30%玉米蜂花粉的饵料具有负趋向性,对含5%、10%和15%玉米蜂花粉的饵料具有正趋向性。黑胸散白蚁对含松花粉饵料的取食量（5～24 mg）均小于对照组（52～54 mg）;对含5%、10%、15%、20%和25%玉米蜂花粉饵料的取食量（15～43 mg）与对照组（11～57 mg）比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）,而对含30%玉米蜂花粉饵料的取食量（108 mg）大于对照组（12 mg）。结论黑胸散白蚁对含20%松花粉和含15%玉米蜂花粉的饵料具有较好的趋向性;不喜食含松花粉的饵料,较喜食含玉米蜂花粉的饵料;随着玉米蜂花粉浓度的提高,取食量逐渐增加。黑胸散白蚁对饵料的嗅觉反应与取食量无相关性。
ObjectiveTo examine the effect of Masson pine pollen and Zea pollinium as food attractant to Reticulitermes chinensis.MethodsThe treatments were designed with Masson pine pollen, and Zea pollinium at 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%,25%, and 30%. The olfactory response and selectivity of R. chinensis were determined with a four- arm olfactometer, andfood consumption of during 10 d was measured.ResultsThe results showed that 15% and 25% Masson pine pollen, and5%, 10%, and 15% Zea pollinium had a repellency to R. chinensis, but other concentrations with an attractant effect; foodconsumption of R. chinensis to untreated control（52-54 mg）was significantly more than the baits containing Masson pinepollen（5-24 mg）; between untreated control（11-57 mg）and 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25% Zea pollinium（15-43 mg）,there was no significant difference,but significant at 30% Zea pollinium（108 mg）obviously more than to control check（12 mg）.Conclusion20% Masson pine pollen and 15% Zea pollinium were attractive to R. chinensis. Termite didn＇t likefood containing Masson pine pollen, but preferred food containing Zea pollinium and food consumption gradually increasedwith concentration increasing. Therefore, researchers suggested that olfactory response and food consumption had nocorrespondence, and should research and analyze separately.
出处
《中国媒介生物学及控制杂志》
CAS
CSCD
2016年第6期566-569,共4页
Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control
基金
住房和城乡建设部2014年科学技术项目计划(2014-k6-002)~~
关键词
松花粉
玉米蜂花粉
黑胸散白蚁
选择系数
取食量
Masson pine pollen
Zea pollinium
Reticulitermes chinensis
Selectivity coefficient
Food consumption
