期刊文献+

双能量CT分析上尿路梗阻性积水的结石成分及临床研究 被引量:6

A Clinical Study Applying DECT in Composition Analysis of Stones in Patients with Obstructive Hydronephrosis of Upper Tract
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的运用双源双能CT(DECT)对上尿路结石组成成分初步判断,验证其准确性,并探讨与重要临床参数的关系。方法连续性选择212例确诊上尿路单发结石伴梗阻性肾积水的患者,所有患者均行DECT扫描,对CT混合能量图像上测量的结石面积、最长径,与患者相关实验室检查与肾盂积水程度进行相关分析;分别测量高低能量图像上结石的CT值,采用双能量软件对结石成分进行初步判断,对手术或自然排出取出的离体结石行红外光谱和联合应用化学及高效液相色谱分析,并以此为参照标准,判断DECT对上尿路结石成分诊断正确率。结果212例患者中共有结石212个,肾盂输尿管移行处结石103例(48.6%),输尿管上段结石59例(27.8%),输尿管中段结石22例(10.4%);输尿管下段结石28例(13.2%)。Ⅰ级肾积水137例(64.6%);Ⅱ级肾积水34例(16.0%);Ⅲ级肾积水32例(15.1%);Ⅳ级9例(4.2%)。肾盂输尿管移行处、输尿管上段、下段结石面积和结石最长径与肾积水程度具有相关性,Pearson相关系数及P值为:r=0.476,P=0.000、r=0.617,P=0.000;r=0.412,P=0.01和r=0.381,P=0.03、r=0.792,P=0.000、r=0.779,P=0.000。以红外光谱分析结石成分为参照标准,DECT分析两种成分混合结石的诊断正确率为91.8%,纯草酸钙的诊断正确率为90.3%;以联合应用化学及高效液相色谱分析结石成分为参照标准,DECT分析两种成分混合结石的诊断正确率为100.0%,纯草酸钙的诊断正确率为85.7%;DECT对纯尿酸及胱氨酸的诊断正确率为100%。结论上尿路单发结石以含钙、两种成分混合结石为主,主要成分为草酸钙和碳酸磷混合;结石的面积和最长径与肾积水程度具有相关性;DECT可对上尿路结石的组成成分进行初步判断,为临床个性化治疗提供帮助。 Objective To evaluate the clinical application of dual-source dual-energy CT( DECT) in preliminary differentiation of stone composition in vivo in patients with obstructive hydronephrosis in the upper tract. Methods By Continuity selection,212 cases of clinically known or suspected of urinary tract stones with obstructive hydronephrosis were gathered. All patients have been confirmed using dual energy CT scan. Correlation anaylsis was calculated between the degree of hydronephrosis and the area of the stones,as well as the longest diameter and laboratory tests. Hounsfield units( HU) of each stone were recorded on the high and low energy imaging by hand-drawing and Region of interest( ROI) method. We then used DECT analysis software for the preliminary identification of stone composition. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of DECT for the differentiation of urinary stone composition,the result of infrared spectroscopy and chemical method combining high performance liquid chromatography( HPLC) analysis was used as a reference standard. Results Among212 patients,CT scanning showed that stones were located at the ureteropelvic junction in 103 patients,upper ureter in 59 patients,middle ureter in 22 patients,and in the lower ureter in 28 patients. 137 patients were classified as hydronephrosis Level Ⅰ,34 patients were Level Ⅱ,32 patients were Level Ⅲ,9 patients were Level Ⅳ and none were Level Ⅴ. Correlation Analysis: stone area was correlated with severity of hydronephrosis despite the region of obstruction( ureteropelvic junction: r = 0. 476,P = 0. 000,upper ureter: r = 0. 412,P = 0. 01,lower ureter: r = 0. 792,P = 0. 000). The similarpattern was revealed between the longest diameter and severity of hydronephrosis( ureteropelvic junction: r = 0. 617,P =0. 000,upper ureter: r = 0. 381,P = 0. 03,lower ureter: r = 0. 779,P = 0. 000). With the infrared spectroscopy and chemical analysis method combining HPLC analysis results as reference standard,the diagnotic accuracy rates of DECT analysis of the two mixed stone components were 91. 8% and 100% and pure calcium oxalate( CaOx) were 90. 3% and85. 7%. The diagnostic accuracy rates of pure uric acid and cystine were both 100%. Conclusion A Single stone in the upper urinary tract which caused upper urinary obstructive hydronephrosis was mainly composed of mixed calcium ingredient,especially CaO x and hydroxyapatite. Correlations were found between the degree of hydronephrosis and stone area,as well as the longest diameter. In a word,DECT could provide preliminary stone components analysis in upper urinary tract,and help to make individual clinical treatment plans.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第9期1403-1406,共4页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
基金 无锡市科技发展资金资助项目(编号:CSE31N1303)
关键词 DECT 上尿路结石 红外光谱 高效液相色谱分析 草酸钙 DECT Upper tract stone Infrared spectroscopy HPLC CaOx
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Grignon A, Filion R, Filiatranh D, et al. Urinary tract dilation in utem: Classification and elincal applications[ J ]. Radiology, 1986, 160:645-47.
  • 2Graser A ,Johnson TR, Bader M, et al. Dual energy CT characteriza- tion of urinary calculi: initial in vitro and clinical experience[ J]. In- vest Radiol,2008, 43 : 112-119.
  • 3Eliahou R, Hidas G, Duvdevani M, et al. Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy computed tamography: an emerging application[ J]. Semin Ultrasound CT MR,2010,31:315-320.
  • 4曾宪春,江杰,吴莉,赵迅冉,韩丹.双源CT双能量成像体外分析泌尿系结石成分[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2015,23(2):96-99. 被引量:38
  • 5林黛英,林少帆,汪丹凤,郑少燕,吴先衡.双源CT双能量泌尿系成像及结石成分分析的临床应用[J].实用放射学杂志,2014,30(5):877-880. 被引量:6
  • 6杨琪放,张挽时,孟利民,时惠平,王东,毕永民,李相生,方红,郭和清,严景民.双源CT双能量成像对泌尿系统结石成分分析的初步研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2011,45(2):133-137. 被引量:31
  • 7Stolzmann P,Kozomara M ,Chuck N ,et al. In vivo identification of u- ric acid stones with dual-energy CT: diagnostic performance evalua- tion in patients[ J]. Abdom Imaging,2010,35:629-635.
  • 8Goertz JK, Lotterman S, Can the degree of hydronephrosis on ultra- sound predict kidney stone size [J]. Am J Emerg Med,2010,28: 813-816.
  • 9Wadhera S, Mathur RK, Odiya S, et al. Solo extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for management of upper ureteral calculi with hydro- nephrosis[ J]. Urol J,2008,5:84-88.
  • 10Zhu Z, Xi Q, Wang S, et al. Pereutaneous nephrolithotomy for proxi- mal ureteral calculi with severe hydronephrosis : assessment of differ- ent lithotriptors [ J ]. J Endouro1,2010 ,24 :201 --205.

二级参考文献18

  • 1Zarse CA,Mcateer JA,Tann M,et al.Helical computed tomography accurately reports urinary stone composition using attenuation values:in vitro verification using high-resolution micro-computed tomography calibrated to Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy.Urology,2004,63(5):828-833.
  • 2Grosjean R,Sauer B,Guerra RM,et al.Characterization of human renal stones with MDCT:advantage of dual energy and limitations due to respiratory motion.Am J Roentgenol,2008,190(3):720-728.
  • 3Stolzmann P,Leschka S,Scheffel H,et al.Characterization of urinary stones with dual-energy CT improved differentiation using a tin filter.Invest Radiol,2010,45(1):1-6.
  • 4Ferrandino MN,Pierre SA,Simmons WN,et al.Dual-energy computed tomography with advanced postimage acquisition data processing:improved determination of urinary stone composition.J Endourol,2010,24(3):347-354.
  • 5Graser A,Johnson TR,Bader M,et al.Dual energy CT characterization of urinary calculi:initial in vitro and clinical experience.Invest Radiol,2008,43(2):112-119.
  • 6Hidas G,Eliahou R,Duvdevani M,et al.Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy CT:in vivo analysis and comparison with X-ray diffraction.Radiology,2010,257(2):394-401.
  • 7Stolzmann P,Kozomara M,Chuck N,et al.In vivo identification of uric acid stones with dual-energy CT:diagnostic performance evaluation in patients.Abdom Imaging,2010,35(5):629-635.
  • 8Matlaga BR,Kawamoto S,Fishman E.Dual source computed tomography:a novel technique to determine stone composition.Urology,2008,72(5):1164-1168.
  • 9Stolzmann P,Scheffel H,Rentsch K,et al.Dual-energy computed tomography for the differentiation of uric acid stones:ex vivo performance evaluation.Urol Res,2008,36(3/4):133-138.
  • 10Boll DT,Patil NA,Paulson EK,et al.Renal stone assessment with dual-energy multidetector CT and advanced postprocessing techniques:improved characterization of renal stone composition-pilot study.Radiology,2009,250(3):813-820.

共引文献66

同被引文献45

引证文献6

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部