期刊文献+

应用杂交技术修补切口疝临床疗效分析(附58例报告) 被引量:4

Hybrid technique for the treatment of incisional hernia:58 cases report
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的总结应用杂交技术修补腹壁切口疝的有效性、安全性及临床疗效。方法对上海交通大学医学院附属第六人民医院2011年1月至2016年1月,应用杂交技术修补腹壁切口疝58例患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果手术时间40~160(92±30)min,缺损最大径为2~25(8±6)cm,补片大小为150~600(273±108)cm2。术后住院时间为6~15(9.3±2.1)d,切口浅表感染3例(5.8%),浆液肿2例(3.4%),术后早期腹壁疼痛8例(13.7%)。无肠道损伤、肠梗阻、伤口出血、补片感染和补片膨出等并发症,术后随访3—53个月,无复发病例。结论应用杂交技术修补腹壁切口疝安全可靠、疗效确切、术后恢复快,尤其适用于复杂、巨大腹壁切口疝。 Objective To explore therapeutic effect of a combined laparoscopic and open technique (hybrid technique) for the repair of incisional hernia. Methods A retrospective analysis was made in 58 incisional hernias during January 2011 to January 2016. Results All cases were operated successfully and recovered uneventfully. The operating time was 40 to 160 (92 ± 30) minutes. The diameter of the hernia ring to 2 to 25 (8 ±6) cm and the mesh size was 150 to 600 (273 ± 108) cm2. Postoperative hospital time was 6 to 15 (9.3 ± 2.1 ) days. Postoperative complications included incision infection (n = 3, 5.8% ), seroma (n=2, 3.4%), abdominal pain (n = 8, 13.7% ). All of them were cured with conservative treatment. No patient developed massive haemorrhage, bulging, mesh infection. No recurrence occurced during the follow- up of 3 to 53 months. Conclusion Hybrid technique is a safe and effective procedure for ineisional hernia repair especially for large complicated hernias.
出处 《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》 2016年第4期248-251,共4页 Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition)
关键词 疝修补术 杂交技术 Hernia Herniorrhaphy Hybrid technique
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Bauer J, HmTis M, Gorfine S, et al. Rives-Stoppa procedure for repair of large incisional hernias : experience with 57 patients [ J ].Hernia ,2002,6 ( 3 ) : 120-123.
  • 2Muller-Riemenschneider F, Roll S, Friedrich M, et al. Medical effectiveness and safety of conventional compared to laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: A systematic review [ J~. Surg Endosc, 2007,21 (12) :2127-2136.
  • 3McMahon M, Kehdy F. Laparoscoplc llepalr oI lngmnm anu Incisional Hernias [ J ], Am Surg, 2011,77 (4) : 389-400.
  • 4Salvilla SA, Thusu S, Panesar SS. Analysing the benefits of laparoscopic hernia repair compared to open repair: A meta-analysis of observational studies[J]. J Minim Access Surg, 2012,8(4) :111- 117.
  • 5Cobb SW, Kercher WK, Matthews DB, et al. Laparoseopic ventralhernia repair: a single center experience ~ J~. Hernia, 2006, 10(3) :236-242.
  • 6Eker HH, Hansson BE, Buunen M, et al. Laparoscopie vs open incisional hernia repair: A randomized elinieal trial I J 1- JAMA Surgery, 2013,148(3) :259-263.
  • 7Bencini L, 5anehez JL, Boffi B, et al. lneisional hernia: repair retrospective eomparison of laparoscopic and open techniques [ J l- Surg Endosc, 2003,17 (10) : 1546-1551.
  • 8Barbaros U, Asoglu O, Seven R , et al. The comparison of laparoseopic and open ventral hernia repairs : a prospective randomized studyrJ]. Hernia. 2007_ 11 ( 1 ) :1-56.
  • 9朱熠林,陈杰,申英末,刘素君,陈富强.杂交技术治疗巨大腹壁切口疝临床疗效分析[J].中国实用外科杂志,2014,34(5):432-434. 被引量:9
  • 10赵凤林,朱熠林,王宝山,申英末,刘素君,陈杰.杂交技术治疗巨大切口疝[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2015,9(3):37-39. 被引量:7

二级参考文献10

共引文献10

同被引文献42

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部