期刊文献+

采用活体成像技术快速评价DNA疫苗载体在小鼠体内的表达

Rapid evaluation of in vivo expression of DNA vaccine vector in mice by noninvaive bioluminescence imaging system
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的采用活体成像技术快速评价DNA疫苗载体在小鼠体内的表达,为DNA疫苗载体的应用和改造提供参考。方法分别构建含有萤火虫荧光素酶基因(luciferase)及HIV-1CN54Gag基因DNA,且携带不同转录调控元件(posttranscriptional regulatory element)HPRE/WPRE的疫苗载体(p DRVI1.0Luc、p DRVI1.0HLuc、p DRVI1.0WLuc、p DRVI1.0Gag、p DRVI1.0HGag和p DRVI1.0WGag),均经后肢胫骨前肌注射BALB/c小鼠,20μg/只。p DRVI-1.0Luc、p DRVI1.0HLuc和p DRVI1.0WLuc组仅免疫1次,于免疫后第1、7、14天采用活体成像技术检测小鼠体内荧光表达强度;p DRVI1.0Gag、p DRVI1.0HGag和p DRVI1.0WGag组分别于第0、2、4周进行免疫,于末次免疫后第2周进行体液(ELISA法)及细胞免疫检测(ELISPOT法)。结果 p DRVI1.0Luc、p DRVI1.0HLuc、p DRVI1.0WLuc组小鼠于免疫后第1及7天,体内荧光均局限分布于注射部位,未出现扩散转移的现象,且p DRVI1.0HLuc质粒发光强度最强(P<0.05),免疫第14天各组均未检测到明显的荧光素酶表达;p DRVI1.0HGag组小鼠血清中抗Gag蛋白特异性抗体水平和Gag蛋白特异的分泌IFNγ的脾淋巴细胞数均明显高于p DRVI1.0Gag和p DRVI1.0WGag组(P<0.05)。结论活体成像技术可用于快速评价DNA疫苗载体在小鼠体内的表达,为DNA疫苗载体改造及免疫策略的优化提供了一个良好的研究平台。 Objective To rapidly evaluate the expression of DNA vaccine vector and provide a reference for the application and modification of DNA vaccine vector. Methods Luciferase and HIV-1 GN54 Gag coding sequence were digested with SalⅠand Eco RV and inserted into the Sal Ⅰ and Eco RV digested pDRVI1. 0, pDRVI1. 0H, pDRVI1. 0W vectors,producing DNA vaccines pDRVI1. 0Luc, pDRVI1. 0HLuc, pDRVI1. 0WLuc, pDRVI1. 0Gag, pDRVI1. 0HGag and pDRVI1. 0WGag, carrying posttranscriptional regulatory element HPRE / WPRE, respectively. BALB / c mice were immunized i. m. with the DNA vaccines respectively, 20 μg for each. The mice in pDRVI1. 0 luc, pDRVI1. 0HLuc and pDRVI1. 0Wluc groups were immunized once, of which the intensity of luciferase gene was analyzed by in vivo bioluminescence imaging technology on days 1, 7 and 14 after immunization. However, the mice in pDRVI1. 0 Gag, pDRVI1. 0HGag and pDRVI1. 0WGag groups were immunized for 3 times at weeks 0, 2 and 4, of which the humoral and cellular immunities were determined at week 2 after the last immunization by ELISA and ELISPOT assay. Results The fluorescence in mice of pDRVI1. 0Luc, pDRVI1. 0HLuc and pDRVI1. 0WLuc groups on days 1 and 7 after immunization were distributed evenly in injection site, without diffusion or transfer, of which the intensity in pDRVI1. 0 HLuc group was the highest(P〈0. 05). No obvious expressions of luciferase were observed in various groups on day 14 after immunization.However, Gag-specific antibody levels and Gag-specific IFNγ secreting spleen lymphocyte counts in pDRVI1. 0HGag group were significantly higher than those in pDRVI1. 0Gag and pDRVI1. 0WGag groups(P〈0. 05). Conclusion Bioluminescence imaging technology might be used for rapid evaluation of expression of DNA vaccine vector in mice, which provided a useful tool for modification of DNA vaccine vector and optimization of immune strategy.
出处 《中国生物制品学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2016年第8期870-874,共5页 Chinese Journal of Biologicals
基金 中国医学科学院医学生物学研究所科技计划项目(IMB2013ZD01)
关键词 活体成像 DNA疫苗 Bioluminescence imagine DNA vaccine
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1MULLIGAN M J,RUSSELL N D,CELUM C,et al.Excellent safety and tolerability of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 p GA2/JS2 plasmid DNA priming vector vaccine in HIV type 1 uninfected adults[J].AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses,2006,22(7):678-683.
  • 2MEUNIER M,CHEMALY M,DORY D.DNA vaccination of poultry:the current status in 2015[J].Vaccine,2016,34(2):202-211.
  • 3LI L,PETROVSKY N.Molecular mechanisms for enhanced DNA vaccine immunogenicity[J].Expert Rev Vaccines,2016,15(3):313-329.
  • 4TANGNEY M,FRANCIS K P.In vivo optical imaging in gene&cell therapy[J].Curr Gene Ther,2012,12(1):2-11.
  • 5WALTHER K A,PAPKE B,SINN M B,et al.Precise measurement of protein interacting fractions with fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy[J].Mol Biosyst,2011,7(2):322-336.
  • 6YANG F,HUO X S,YUAN S X,et al.Repression of the long noncoding RNA-LET by histone deacetylase 3 contributes to hypoxia-mediated metastasis[J].Mol Cell,2013,49(6):1083-1096.
  • 7HAN X J,WEI Y F,WAN Y Y,et al.Development of a novel liposomal nanodelivery system for bioluminescence imaging and targeted drug delivery in Erb B2-overexpressing metastatic ovarian carcinoma[J].Int J Mol Med,2014,34(5):1225-1232.
  • 8STRACHNA O,TORRECILLA D,REUMANN M K,et al.Molecular imaging of expression of vascular endothelial growth factor a(VEGF a)in femoral bone grafts transplanted into living mice[J].Cell Transplant,2014,23(7):901-912.
  • 9SUN J,LI D,HAO Y,et al.Posttranscriptional regulatory elements enhance antigen expression and DNA vaccine efficacy[J].DNA Cell Biol,2009,28(5):233-240.
  • 10刘强,齐香荣,朱蓉,黄维金,阮力,李保卫,邵荣光,王佑春.利用活体成像术对痘苗病毒小鼠体内生物分布和表达的研究[J].中国病毒病杂志,2013,3(4):274-279. 被引量:3

二级参考文献20

  • 1黄相刚,徐建青,任莉,仇超,张宁,刘连兴,万延民,彭虹,邵一鸣.人类免疫缺陷病毒DNA疫苗黏膜免疫小鼠免疫力研究[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(44):3109-3113. 被引量:5
  • 2Asmuth DM, Brown EL, DiNubile MJ, Sun X, del Rio C, Harro C, Keefer MC, Kublin JG, Dubey SA, Kierstead LS, Casimiro DR, Shiver JW, Robertson MN, Quirk EK, Me- hrotra DV. Comparative cell-mediated immunogenicity of DNA/DNA, DNA/adenovirus type 5 (Ad5), or Ad5/Ad5 HIV-1 clade B gag vaccine prime-boost regimens [J]. J In- fect Dis, 2010, 201 (1):132-141.
  • 3Coban C, Kobiyama K, Aoshi T, Takeshita F, Horii T, Akira S, lshii KJ. Novel strategies to improve DNA vaccine immunogenicity[J]. Curr Gene Ther, 2011, 11 (6): 479-484.
  • 4van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk S, Hannaman D. Electro- poration for DNA immunization: clinical application[J]. Expert Rev Vaccines, 2010, 9 (5):503-517.
  • 5Dolter KE, Evans CF, Ellefsen B, Song J, Boente-Carrera M, Vittorino R, Rosenberg TJ, Hannaman D, Vasan S. Immunogenicity, safety, biodistribution and persistence of ADVAX, a prophylactic DNA vaccine for HIV-1, delivered by in vivo electroporation[J]. Vaccine, 2011, 29 (4): 795-803.
  • 6Liu Y, Li F, Liu Y, Hong K, Meng X, Chen J, Zhang Z, Huo Z, Sun M, Self SG, Shao Y HIV fragment gag vac- cine induces broader T cell response in mice [J]. Vaccine, 2011, 29 (14):2582-2589.
  • 7Wang W, Nie J, Prochnow C, Truong C, Jia Z, Wang S, Chen XS, and Wang Y. A systematic study of the N-glyco'- sylation sites of HIV-1 envelope protein on infectivity and antibody-mediated neutralization [J]. Retrovirology, 2013, 10..14.
  • 8Dobafio C, Widera G, Rabussay D, Doolan DL. Enhance- ment of antibody and cellular immune responses to malaria DNA vaccines by in vivo electroporation [J]. Vaccine, 2007, 25 (36) :6635-6645.
  • 9van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk S, Luxembourg A, Ellefsen B, Wilson D, Ubach A, Hannaman D, van den Hurk JV. Electroporation-based DNA transfer enhances gene expres- sion and immune responses to DNA vaccines in cattle [J]. Vaccine, 2008, 26 (43):5503-5509.
  • 10Laddy DJ, Yan J, Khan AS, Andersen H, Cohn A, Green- house J, Lewis M, Manischewitz J, King LR, Golding H, Draghia-Akli R, Weiner DB. Electroporation of synthetic DNA antigens offers protection in nonhuman primates chal- lenged with highly pathogenic avian influenza virus [J]. J Virol, 2009, 83 (9):4624-4630.

共引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部