摘要
目的比较Metis-200(深圳爱康)自动血型分析仪与Xantus双机械臂加样器联合Poseidon数字血型仪检测ABO及Rh D血型的效果。方法同时采用两种自动血型仪对本站无偿献血样本24 866份进行平行血型检测、脂血干扰试验、溶血干扰试验和对比分析。结果两种血型分析仪对ABO血型判读准确率均为100%。通过确认,Metis-200和Xantus双机械臂加样器联合Poseidon数字血型仪检出ABO亚型分别为7例、5例(P>0.05);检出不规则抗体分别为16例、9例(P>0.05)。76份不同脂血程度血样在两种仪器上抗干扰试验一次判读正确率均为100%。溶血干扰试验在Hb≤27 g/L时,对UV型微板法结果判读无明显影响,当Hb>27 g/L时对凝集端有影响,对非凝集端无影响;而当Hb≤20 g/L时,对梯形微板法试验结果无明显影响;在Hb>20 g/L时对梯形微板法凝集端无影响,对非凝集端有影响。结论 Metis-200自动血型分析仪较Xantus双机械臂加样器联合Poseidon数字血型仪检测ABO及Rh D血型判读更加准确,速度更快,效率更高,极大地提高了血型批量检测的能力。
Objective To compare the effect of blood group typing for ABO and Rh D by using Metis-200（Shenzhen Icahn） automatic blood analyzer and Xantus ＋ Poseidon. Methods Two kinds of automatic blood analyzers were used to test 24 866 blood samplesblood interference, and comparative analysis. Results Accurate interpretation of the ABO blood group by the two analyzers was 100%. Metis-200 and Xantus dual robotics pipette joint Poseidon digital instrument presented seven and five cases of ABO blood group subtypes, respectively（P 〉 0.05）; irregular antibodies were detected in 16 and 9 cases（P〉0.05）. 76 samples with different degrees of blood fat were examined by the two instruments for the antiinterference test, and the correct interpretation rate was 100%. Haemolysis interference test, when Hb concentration was less than or equal to 27 g/L, showed no negative impact on the interpretation of ＂UV＂ micro plate method. ConclusionMetis-200 automatic blood analyzer, compared with Xantus dual robotics pipette joint Poseidon digital ABO and Rh D blood group, is more accurate, faster, and more efficient, and may greatly enhance the efficacy for batch testing of blood.
出处
《临床输血与检验》
CAS
2016年第4期347-349,共3页
Journal of Clinical Transfusion and Laboratory Medicine
关键词
自动血型分析仪
UV型微板法
梯形微板法
Automatic blood type analyzer
UV-typing microplate assay
Trapezoid-typing microplate assay
