期刊文献+

简版生活质量量表(SF-12)在农村高龄老年人中的测量信度与效度 被引量:28

Reliability and validity of short form Quality Life Scale( SF-12) for elderly persons in countryside
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价简版生活质量量表(SF-12)在农村高龄老人中的测量信度和效度。方法采用分层整群抽样方式,对789名农村高龄老人进行调查。结果极端组比较的决断值介于3.012~10.060,题总相关系数介于0.105~0.742,量表内部一致性系数介于0.833~0.864,量表因子负荷量介于0.458~0.861,量表总的内部一致性系数为0.861,重测信度为0.814,抽取特征值大于1的因子有3个,累计贡献率达到63.54%,校标效度的相关系数为0.715,8个维度的聚合成功率为100%,区分成功率为100%。结论sF.12具有较好的测量信度和效度,能够用于农村高龄老人生活质量的评价。 Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of SF-12 for elderly persons in countryside. Methods The stratified cluster sampling method was used to survey 789 elderly persons in countryside. Results The critical ratio of the extreme groups ranged from 3. 012 to 10. 060, the total correlation coefficient ranged from 0. 105 to 0. 742, the internal consistency coefficient ranged from 0. 833 to 0. 864, the amount of factor load ranged from 0. 458 to 0. 861, the overall internal consistency coefficient was 0. 861, and the retest reliability was 0. 814. Three factors with characteristic values greater than 1 were extracted and the cumulative contribution rate was 63.54%. The correlation coefficient of criterion validity was 0. 715, the success rate of polymerization for 8 dimensions was 100%, and the discriminative power was 100%. Conclusion SF-12 has favorable reliability and validity and can be used to evaluate the quality of life for elderly persons in countryside.
作者 王红雨 张林
出处 《上海交通大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第7期1070-1074,共5页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University:Medical Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学规划项目(13YJA890035) 安徽省优秀青年人才基金重点项目(gxyqzd2016156) 安徽省教育厅质量工程重点项目(2014jyxm204)~~
关键词 生活质量 农村 高龄老人 the quality of life countryside elderly people
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献52

  • 1彭宁宁,王丽萍,汪玲,周月芳,高根娣,罗春燕,朱蔚,朱佳佩.上海市中小学生生活质量状况调查[J].中国学校卫生,2005,26(4):265-268. 被引量:31
  • 2赵金扣,马小燕,王丽艳,吕繁.用于难以接近人群的一种新的抽样方法:同伴推动抽样法(RDS)[J].疾病控制杂志,2005,9(6):634-637. 被引量:64
  • 3韦懿芸,颜艳,王多劳,郭艳芳,张磊,孙振球.中文版SF-36在社区老年人生存质量评价中的应用[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2006,31(2):184-188. 被引量:98
  • 4王爱萍 邹华伟 等.SF-36对三类病人健康状况测量结果的分析[J].国际中华身心医学杂志,1999,1(1):44-45.
  • 5Frank Huang-Chih Chou, Pesus Chou, Tom Tung-Ping Su, et al. Quality of life and related risk factors in aTaiwan Residents Village population 21 months 'after an earthquake [J]. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 2004, 38: 358- 364.
  • 6Gandek B, Ware JE Jr, Aaronson NK, et al. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the SF -36 in eleven countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment [JJ. J Clin Epidemiol, 1998, 51 (11): 1149- 1158.
  • 7Yao G, Chung CW, Yu CF, et al. Development and verification of validity and reliability of th~ WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version [J]. Formos Med Assoc, 2002, 101: 342-351.
  • 8Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD.How to Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales [M]. Boston, Massachusetts: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1995.
  • 9Xuemei Luo, Mandy Lynn George, Ikey Kakouras, et al. Relia- bility, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Short Form 12-Item Survey (SF-12) in Patients With Back Pain [J]. Spine, 2003, 28 (15): 1739-1745.
  • 10Crispin Jenkinson, Richard Layte, Damian Jenkinson, et al. A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies [J]. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 1997, 19 (2): 179-186.

共引文献419

同被引文献273

引证文献28

二级引证文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部