摘要
人格要素的商业利用为人格权主体创造了财产价值,但它并不适宜被归列到独立于人格权之外的一项财产权中:首先,需要反思财产权与人格权的区分标准;它并非建立在权利是否具有财产价值及可转让性之上,而应当为权利客体的属性——能否永久地外在于主体。其次,人格要素的商业利用并未改变人格要素的内在于主体的属性。所谓的"外在性"只是技术发展带来的手段及工具意义上的。它决定了以人格要素为客体的权利只能属于人格权,人格要素所带来的财产价值乃人格权权能的体现。财产利益与精神利益不可分割地交织于人格权中。这种构造不仅与人格权的受尊重权的属性及专属性并不冲突,而且回复了人格权的原貌,能更好地实现人格的价值。
Commercial use of personality factor bring owner of personality property value,but it belongs not to property right independent of personality right,but to personality right： first of all,the standard of distinguishing between property right and personality right should be considered. It lies not in whether right contains property value or is transferable,but in the attributes of object. Secondly,Commercial use of personality factor brings no change to internal attributes of personality right. so- called ‘externality ‘stands in the sin of methods and tools caused by development of technology. All these are decisive for attributes of right based on personality factor,which should be classified as personality right. Property value is embodied in personality right. Property interests and spiritual interests inextricably interwoven in personality right,which is not in conflict with respected- by attributes and exclusive attributes,also bring back the original of personality right,and can better realize the value of personality.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第4期69-76,共8页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社科基金青年项目(14CFX073)
大连海事大学中央高校基本科研业务(01750709)
关键词
人格权
财产价值
人格权的商品化
personality right
property value
the commercialization of personality right
