期刊文献+

二语学术写作的引证能力及其发展特征:截面与历时证据 被引量:16

The Developmental Features of Citation Competence in L2 Academic Writing:Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Evidence
原文传递
导出
摘要 现有的国际引证研究多从引用的策略功能和文本形式两个角度来分析,未能系统考察学术写作引证能力的构成及发展。本次研究首先从引证的内容、人际和语篇三个维度,界定学术写作引证能力的构念,然后结合国际专家的论文引证特征,通过截面比较和历时个案分析,探究我国本硕博英语学习者学术写作中引证能力的发展特征。结果显示:(1)引证的全面性不断提高,但是论文不同部分的引证重点不够明确。(2)引证的人际互动能力仅在博士阶段获得较好的发展,引证关联度有所加强。(3)语篇融入能力没有显著进步,引证的文本方式倾向于凸显被引人的身份与观点。历时个案分析进一步发现个体差异的存在。研究结果对构建二语学术写作能力理论、加强研究方法和教学实践具有启示意义。 The existing literature on citation use generally focuses on the rhetorical functions and textual forms of citations in research writing,hence a lack of systematic look into the citation competence and developmental features on the part of student writers. The present study first defines the constructs of citation competence from its ideational,interpersonal and textual dimensions. By cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis in the comparison of student writing with professional writing,the study explores the developmental features of citation competence in the Chinese BA,MA and Ph D theses of applied linguistics. The study finds that( 1) the ideational aspect of citation keeps increasing,but the focus of what to cite seems unclear in each section of the research writing.( 2) The interpersonal aspect does not develop until students reach the doctoral stage when they are able to enhance connections between sources.( 3)The textual competence does not progress significantly. The longitudinal case study further reveals individual differences. The results have some implications for theorizing L2 academic writing,strengthening research methodology and improving writing pedagogy.
作者 徐昉
出处 《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期73-82,共10页 Journal of Foreign Languages
基金 国家社科基金项目"二语学术写作中的评价系统研究"(课题编号:12BYY052)成果之一
关键词 学术写作 引证 截面分析 历时个案研究 academic writing citation cross-sectional longitudinal case study
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Aksnes, D. W. & A. Rip. Researchers' perceptions of citation [ J ]. Research Policy, 2009, (38) : 895 -905.
  • 2Bloch, J. & L. Chi. A comparison of the use of citations in Chinese and English academic discourse [ C]//Bel-chef, D. & G. Brain. Academic Writing in A Second Language: Essays on research and pedagogy. Norwood: Ablex, 1995. 231 -274.
  • 3Gray, B. & D. Biber. Current conceptions of" stance [ C]//Hyland, K. & C. S. Guinda. Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. London : Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.15 - 33.
  • 4Hyland, K. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse [ J ]. Discourse Studies, 2005, (7) : 173 -191.
  • 5Hyland, K. Academic Discourse : English in a global context [ M ]. London : Continuum, 2009.
  • 6Kwan, B. S. C. & H. Chan. An investigation of source use in the results and the closing sections of empirical ar- ticles in Information Systems: In search of a functional-semantic citation typology for pedagogical purposes [ J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2014, (14) : 29-47.
  • 7Li, Y. & C. P. Casanave. Two first-year students' strategies for writing from sources : Patchwriting or plagia- rism? [ J ]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2012, (21) : 165 - i80.
  • 8Mansourizadeh, K. & U. K. Ahmad. Citation practices among non-rmtive expert and novice scientific writers [ J ]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2011, (10) : 79 - 88.
  • 9Matsuda, P. K. Identity in written discourse [ J ]. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2015, (35) : 140 - 159.
  • 10Moravcsik, M. & P. Murugesan. Some resuhs on the function and quality of citations [ J]. Social Studies of Sci- ence, 1975, (1): 86-92.

二级参考文献115

同被引文献135

引证文献16

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部