摘要
文章分三节论述,分别为章太炎先生关于《黄帝内经》散论、《黄帝内经》专论及《黄帝内经》成书于战国之末。其中,"散论"分为14个问题:1中医疗效高于西医,中医辨证施治有7个方面高于西医之诊断;2《黄帝内经》偶有傅会吉凶灾眚处是其不足;3论《汉志·方技略》医经、经方、神仙、房中四家历史演变与分合;4论《方技略》中唯医经、经方最为适用;5论中国古代有解剖术,"解剖"一词最早见于《灵枢经·经水篇》,附有案例;6批判郑文焯关于"视病"之误说;7论《素问》关于三部九候脉法与寸口诊脉法并存,不可偏废;8太炎对五行与五脏有生克关系持严厉批判态度;9论"七篇大论"六气标本于医事最为切要,其论五行及司天在泉诸说为傅会之言;10论《黄帝内经》与白氏内外经、扁鹊内外经有会通之说无法得到证明;论《伤寒论》为经方之作,《金匮要略》《脉经》为医经兼经方之作;论《黄帝内经》开阖枢的确切涵义;批判郑文焯所著《医故》之谬说;论中国古代有细菌致病之说,此说非始于远西。《黄帝内经》专论则涉及《论素问灵枢》诸多问题。
This paper discussed from 3 chapters, scatteredtreatise on The Inner Canon of Huangdi, monograph on The Inner Canon of Huangdi and the creation time of the book was the end of warring states period.The scattered treatise was discussed from 14 parts:1The efficacy of TCM is superior to the western medicine from 7 aspects; 2The Inner Canon of Huangdi had some disadvantages; 3Historical evolution in Hanzhi Fangjilue; 4Medical classic and classical prescription were suitable in Fangjilue; 5Anatomy was appeared in ancient China; 6To criticize the opinion of ZHENG Wen-zhuo; 7Pulse methods of three portions and nine pulse-takings were being with Cunkou diagnosis; 8To criticize ongeneration and restriction between five elements and five zang; 9Six qi was more important; 10 There was no evidence that The Inner Canon of Huangdi was related to Baishi Nei/Wai Jing and Bianque Nei/Wai Jing; Treatise on Febrile Diseases was classical work and Synopsis of Golden Chamber and Pulse Classics were medical classic and classical work; The definite meaning of the theory of ‘open, close and axis' in The Inner Canon of Huangdi; To criticize on the irresponsible talk of ZHENG Wen-zhuo in Yigu; Bacteria theory was appeared in the ancient China rather than in the west.The monograph on The Inner Canon of Huangdi was involved many problems on Treatise on Suwen Lingshu.
出处
《中华中医药杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2017年第2期411-419,共9页
China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词
黄帝内经
散论
专论
成书时代
考证
The Inner Canon of Huangdi
Scatteredtreatise
Monograph
Creation time
Textual research
