期刊文献+

股骨近端防旋髓内钉与亚洲型股骨近端防旋髓内钉固定治疗股骨转子间骨折的疗效比较 被引量:24

Comparison of proximal femoral nail antirotation and proximal femoral nail antirotation- lI in treatment of femur intertrochanteric fracture
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)与亚洲型PFNA(PFNA-Ⅱ)固定治疗股骨转子间骨折的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2009年5月至2014年7月采用PFNA或PFNA-Ⅱ内固定治疗且获得随访的54例股骨转子间骨折患者资料,根据不同时间段采用内固定物不同分为两组:PFNA组27例,2009年5月至2011年11月期间采用PFNA固定;PFNA-Ⅱ组27例,2011年12月至2014年7月采用PFNA-Ⅱ固定。比较两组患者的手术时间、显性失血量、隐性失血量、术中及术后并发症发生情况、骨折愈合时间及末次随访时髋关节Harris评分等。结果PFNA组与PFNA-Ⅱ组患者的随访时间平均分别为(22.6±4.8)、(19.5±4.6)个月。PFNA组患者显性失血量[(130.1±74.3)mL]显著多于PFNA-Ⅱ组患者[(46.3±23.1)mL],术中医源性股骨近端外侧壁骨折发生率(18.5%,5/27)、术后大腿外侧软组织激惹发生率(22.2%,6/27)、术后大腿中段痛发生率(22.2%,6/27)显著高于PFNA-Ⅱ组患者[0,3.7%(1/27),3.7%(1/27)],差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。两组患者的手术时间、隐性失血量、术后内科并发症发生率、骨折愈合时间、末次随访时髋关节Harris评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论与PFNA固定比较,PFNA—Ⅱ固定术中出血量少,术中、术后内固定相关并发症发生率低。 Objective To compare the clinical effects of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and proximal femoral nail antirotation- Ⅱ (PFNA- Ⅱ) in the internal fixation of femoral intertrochanteric fracture. Methods A retrospective study was conducted of the 54 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture who had been treated at our department from May 2009 through July 2014. During May 2009 and November 2011, 27 of them were treated with PFNA; during December 2011 and July 2014, the other 27 of them were treated with PFNA - Ⅱ. The 2 groups were compared in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss volume, hidden blood loss volume, intraoperative and postoperative complications, fracture healing time and Harris hip score at the last follow-up. Results In the PFNA group, 27 patients were followed up for an average time of 22. 6 ± 4. 8 months. In the PFNA-Ⅱ group, 27 patients were followed up for an average time of 19.5±4.6 months. The PFNA group had significantly more intraoperative blood loss volume (130. 1 ± 74.3 mL), and significantly higher rates of intraoperative lateral wall fracture of the proximal femur (18.5%, 5/27), postoperative lateral thigh soft tissue irritation (22. 2%, 6/27) and postoperative thigh pain (22.2%, 6/27) than the PFNA- Ⅱ group [46.3 ± 23.1 mL, 0, 3.7% (1/27), 3.7% (1/27), respectively] (P 〈 0. 05). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in operation time, hidden blood loss, postoperative complications of internal diseases, fracture healing time, or Harris hip score of last follow-up ( P 〉 0. 05). Conclusion Compared with PFNA, PFNA- Ⅱ may lead to a smaller volume of intraoperative blood loss and a lower incidence of com- plications related to internal fixation.
出处 《中华创伤骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第5期435-438,共4页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
关键词 髋骨折 骨折固定术 髓内 骨钉 Hip fractures Fracture fixation, intramedullary Bone nails
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and ac- etabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation[J] . J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1969, 51(4): 737-755.
  • 2袁晓明,姚琦,倪杰,彭立彬,于大昕.股骨近端防旋髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的荟萃分析[J].中华医学杂志,2014,94(11):836-839. 被引量:133
  • 3Zeng C, Wang YR, Wei J, et al. Treatment of trochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation or dynamic hip screw systems: a meta-analysis[J] . J Int Med Res, 2012, 40(3): 839-851. DOI: 10. 1177/147323001204000302.
  • 4王海洲,林强,陈海云,陈平,谢贻达,许树柴,罗翱翔.InterTan髓内钉治疗股骨转子间骨折的疗效分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2012,14(8):729-731. 被引量:4
  • 5王义国,陈明,胡继坤,郑威伟,丁骁鹏.老年股骨转子间骨折3种内固定治疗方法的比较[J].中国骨伤,2013,26(8):651-655. 被引量:30
  • 6Zhang S, Zhang K, Jia Y, et al. InterTan nail versus Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation-Asia in the treatment of unstable troehanterie frac- tures[J]. Orthopedics, 2013, 36(3): e288-e294. DOI: 10. 3928/ 01477447 -20130222-16.
  • 7Gotfried Y. The lateral trochanterie wall: a key element in the re- construction of unstable pertroehantefie hip fractures[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004(425): 82-86.
  • 8张世民.股骨粗隆间骨折中外侧壁的概念及其临床意义[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2010,18(17):1489-1492. 被引量:60
  • 9Sehat KR, Evans RL, Newman JH. Hidden blood loss following hip and knee arthroplasty correct management of blood loss should take hidden loss into account[J] . J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2004, 86(4): 561-565. DOI: 10. 1302/0301-620X. 86B4. 14508.

二级参考文献55

  • 1赵刘军,柴波,徐荣明,应启迩,薛波,张峰,王邦荣,平泉川.高龄患者股骨粗隆骨折的治疗[J].中国骨伤,2007,20(5):321-323. 被引量:14
  • 2Gotfried Y. The lateral trochanteric wall: a key element in the recon- struction of unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures [ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res .2004.425:82 - 86.
  • 3Im GI, Shin YW, Song YJ. Potentially unstable intertrochanteric fractures [ J]. J Orthop Trauma,2005,1:5 - 9.
  • 4Palm H, Jacobsen S, Sonne - Holm S, et al. Integrity of the lateral fernoral wall in intertrochanteric hip fractures : an important predictor of a reoperation [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2007,3:470 -475.
  • 5Gotfried Y. Letter to the editor regarding "Integrity of the lateral femoral wall in intertrochanteric hip fractures : an important predictor of a reoperation" [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2007,11:2552 - 2253.
  • 6Sadowski C, Lubbeke A, Saudan M, et al. Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or a 95 degrees screw - plate: a prospective, randomized study [ J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2002,3:372 - 381.
  • 7Bong MR,Patel V,Iesaka K,et al. Comparison of a sliding hip screw with a trochanteric lateral support plate to an intramedullary hip screw for fixation of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures : a cadaver study [ J]. J Trauma,2004,56:791 - 794.
  • 8Kuzyk PRT, Lobo J, Whelan D, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of extramedullary versus intramedullary fixation for reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures [ J ]. J Orthop Trauma,2009,1:31 - 38.
  • 9Madsen JE, Naess L, Aune AK, et al. Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the gamma nail and compression hip screw [ J ]. J Orthop Trauma, 1998,12:241 - 248.
  • 10Haidukewych GJ, Israel TA, Berry DJ. Reverse obliquity fractures of the intertrochanteric region of the femur[ J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001,83:643 -650.

共引文献220

同被引文献215

引证文献24

二级引证文献196

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部