期刊文献+

侧卧位与仰卧位股骨近端防旋髓内钉固定治疗股骨转子间骨折的疗效比较 被引量:25

Lateral decubitus versus supine position in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较侧卧位与仰卧位股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)固定治疗股骨转子间骨折的疗效。方法回顾性分析2013年9月至2014年9月期间收治的85例股骨转子间骨折患者资料,男24例,女61例;年龄为28~99岁,平均78.5岁;骨折按Evans.Jensen分型:I型I例,Ⅱ型15例,Ⅲ型40例,Ⅳ型23例,V型6例。所有患者均采用PFNA固定治疗,根据患者体位不同分为两组:侧卧位组45例,仰卧位组40例,比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术前术后血红蛋白差值、术后尖顶距、股骨距.尖顶距、骨折愈合时间及髋关节Harris评分等。结果85例患者术后获9~21个月(平均13.6个月)随访。两组患者骨折均获愈合,无一例患者发生螺钉切出。侧卧位组患者手术时间[(60.3±17.5)min】、术中出血量[(70.8±37.8)mL】显著少于仰卧位组患者【(72.7±19.7)min、(90.3±20.9)mL】,术前术后血红蛋白差值【(24.1±5.7)g/L】显著低于仰卧位组患者[(28.2±8.5)g/L】,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。而两组患者术后尖顶距、股骨距.尖顶距等比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。侧卧位组与仰卧位组患者骨折愈合时间平均分别为(3.7±0.9)、(3.7±1.0)个月,髋关节Harris评分平均分别为(73.4±10.7)、(75.5±9.5)分,差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论侧卧位PFNA固定治疗股骨转子间骨折较仰卧位手术时间明显缩短、术中出血量减少。 Objective To compare the lateral decubitus and supine position in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures with femoral proximal nail antirotation (PFNA) . Methods A retrospective analysis was performed of the 85 patients with intertroehanteric fracture who had been treated at our hospital between September 2013 and September 2014. They were 24 men and 61 women, 28 to 99 years of age (average, 78.5 years). By Evans-Jensen classification, one ease was type Ⅰ, 15 eases were type Ⅱ, 40 type Ⅱ, 23 type Ⅳ, and 6 type V. All the patients were treated with internal fixation with PFNA. Lateral decubitus position was adopted in 45 cases and supine position in 40. The 2 groups were compared in terms of operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, difference between preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin values, tip-apex distance (TAD), ealear tip-apex distance (Cal-TAD), fracture healing time, and Harris score of the hip joint. Results The 85 patients were followed up for 9 to 21 months (average, 13.6 months). Both 2 groups obtained fracture healing, with no screw cut-out. The lateral decubitus group had significantly less operation time (60. 3± 17.5 rain) and intraoperative bleeding volume (70. 8 ± 37.8 mL) than the supine position group (72. 7 ± 19.7 min and 90. 3 ± 20. 9 mL, respectively) ( P 〈 0.05) . The former also had a significantly smaller difference between preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin values (24. 1 ± 5.7 g/L) than the latter (28.2 ± 8.5 g/L) ( P 〈 0. 05) . There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in TAD, Cal-TAD, fracture healing time (3.7 ±0. 9 months versus 3.7 ± 1.0 months), or Harris hip score (73.4±10.7versus75.5±9.5) (P〉 0.05) . Conclusion In the treatment of femoral intertrochanterie fractures with PFNA, lateral decubitus position may be associated with shorter op- eration time and less intraoperative blood loss compared with supine position.
出处 《中华创伤骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第5期401-406,共6页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
基金 上海市科委基金(15DZ2343200)
关键词 髋骨折 骨折固定术 髓内 骨钉 体位 Hip fractures Fracture fixation, intramedullary Bone nails Position
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1徐纪庆,张霆,侯宝兴.股骨粗隆间骨折治疗方法的临床分析[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2000,8(6):39-41. 被引量:66
  • 2Bray TJ, Smith-Hoefer E, Hooper A, et al. The displaced femoral neck fracture. Internal fixation versus bipolar endoprosthesis. Results of a prospective, randomized comparison[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1988(230): 127-140.
  • 3Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, et al. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip[J] . J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1995, 77(7): 1058-1064.
  • 4Takigami I, Matsumoto K, Ohara A, et al. Treatment of trochanteric fractures with the PFNA (Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation) nail system-report of early results[J] . Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis, 2008, 66 (4): 276-279.
  • 5Tang P, Hu F, Shen J, et al. Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus hemiarthroplasty: a study for the treatment of intertrochanterie frac- tures[J]. Injury, 2012, 43(6): 876-881. DOI: 10. 1016/j. injury. 2011.11. 008.
  • 6Yaozeng X, Dechun G, Huilin Y, et al. Comparative study of troehanterie fracture treated with the proximal femoral nail an- ti-rotation and the third generation of gamma nail[J] . Injury, 2010, 41(12): 1234-1238. DOI: 10. 1016/j. injury. 2010.03. 005.
  • 7Haddad FS, Cobiella CE, Wilson L. Inferior epigastric artery avul- sion: a fracture table complication[J] . J Orthop Trauma, 1998, 12 (g): 587-588. DOI: 10. 1097/00005131-199811000-00010.
  • 8王述伟,苏山林,马象武,杨志全,张永青.非骨科牵引床两种体位PFNA治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的对比研究[J].中国民间疗法,2013,21(8):56-57. 被引量:3
  • 9Zha GC, Chen ZL, Qi XB, et al. Treatment of pertroehanteric frac- tures with a proximal femur locking compression plate[J] . Injury, 2011, 42(11): 1294-1299. DOI: 10. 1016/j. injury. 2011.01. 030.
  • 10刘伟军,胡奕山,林本丹,周来喜.仰卧位与侧卧位下股骨近端髓内钉对老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者疗效的影响[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2015,14(15):1264-1267. 被引量:12

二级参考文献21

  • 1刘玉杰,卢世璧,张伯勋,王继芳.加压滑动鹅头钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折并发症探讨[J].中华创伤杂志,1995,11(2):118-119. 被引量:17
  • 2Horowitz BG. Retrospective analysis of hip fractures[J].Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1966,123 (3) .. 565-570.
  • 3Weller I,Wai EK,Jaglal S,et al. The effect of hospital type and surgical delay on mortality after surgery for hip fracture[J].J Bone Joint Surg Br,2005,87(3)..361-366.
  • 4Simmermacher RK, Ljungqvist J, Bail H, et al. The new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in daily practice.. results of a multicentre clinical study[J]. Injury, 2008,39 (8): 932-939.
  • 5Chang SM, Song DL, Ma Z, et al. Mismatch of the short straight ceph-alomedullary nail ( PFNA - II) with the anterior bow of the femur in anasian population[ J] . J Orthop Trauma, 2014,28( 1 ) :17 - 22.
  • 6Hu SJ,Yu GR,Zhang SM. Surgical Treatment of Basicervical Intertro-chanteric Fractures of the Proximal Femur with Cephalomeduallary HipNails[J]. Orthop Surg, 2013,5(2) :124-129.
  • 7Kumar N, Kataria H, Yadav C, et al. Evaluation of proximal femorallocking plate in unstable extracapsular proximal femoral fractures : Surgi-cal technique & mid term follow up results[ J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma,2014,5(3):137 -145.
  • 8Cho SH, Lee SH, Cho HL,et al. Additional fixations for sliding hipscrews in treating unstable pertrochajiteric femoral fractures (AO type 31-A2) : short - term clinical results[ J]. Clin Orthop Surg,2011,3(2):107-113.
  • 9Zha GC, Chen ZL, Qi XB, et al. Treatment of pertrochanteric fractureswith a proximal femur locking compression plate[ J]. Injury, 2011,42(11):1294-1299.
  • 10Chechik 0,Amar E, Khashan M, et al. Favorable radiographic out-comes using the expandable proximal femoral nail in the treatment of hipfractures - A randomized controlled trial[ J]. J Orthop,2014,11(2):103 -109.

共引文献77

同被引文献172

引证文献25

二级引证文献254

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部