元话语理论研究范式述评被引量：17

A Review of the Theoretical Perspectives of Metadiscourse Research

导出

摘要元话语是帮助作者组织语篇、表达对命题的态度和实现作者与读者互动的语言成分。元话语概念的模糊性与分类的多样性源于理论视角的差异。本文在分析了当前元话语研究比较集中的功能、认知和语用视角的基础上,重点评述了新近被关注的涵盖主体间性理论、话语理论、交往行为理论的语言哲学视角,试图拓宽元话语研究的理论视角,为元话语研究在哲学上找到注脚。 Metadicourse is the language element that can help writers organize discourses,showattitude toward proposition and achieve the interaction between writers and readers. The vagueness of the conception of metadiscourse and the diverse categorization of metadiscourse result from the difference in theoretical perspectives. On the basis of analyzing perspectives taken in majority including functional,cognitive and pragmatic,this article reviews the recently focused perspective,that is,the perspective of language philosophy,including intersubjectivity theory,discourse theory and communication action theory,in the hope that it can broaden the theoretical perspective of metadiscourse study and find the footnote in philosophy for metadiscourse study.

作者王强成晓光

机构地区东北师范大学外国语学院辽宁师范大学外国语学院

出处《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期55-62,145,共8页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching

基金国家社会科学基金一般项目"英语专业本科生元语用能力的构成及培养研究"(项目编号:15BYY100)的阶段性成果

关键词元话语语言哲学主体间性话语交往行为 metadiscourse philosophy of language intersubjectivity discourse communicative action

分类号 H319 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献43

1Austin, J. 1962. How to Do Things with Words [M ]. Oxford:OUP.
2Bateson,G. 1971. Steps to An Ecology of Mind[ M]. New York:Ballantine.
3Beauvais ,P. 1989. A speech act theory of metadiscourse[ J]. Written Communication, ( 1 ) : 11 - 30.
4Cristmore,A. ,R. Markkanen & M. Steffensen. 1993. Metadiscourse in persuasive writing:A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students[J]. Written Communication, (1) :39 -71.
5Dillion, G. 1981. Constructing Texts: Elements of A Theory of Composition and Style [ M ]. Bloomington: Indi- ana University Press.
6Goffman,E. 1974. Forms of Talk[M]. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.
7Keller, E. 1979. Gambits: Conversational strategy signals [ J ]. Journal of Pragmatics, ( 3 ) :219 - 228.
8Halliday, M. A. K. 1973. Explorations in the Function of Language [ M ]. London : Edward Arnold.
9Harris ,Z. 1959. Linguistics transforrmations for information retrieval[ A]. In Papers in Structural and Trans- forrmational Linguistics [ C ]. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
10Hyland, K. 1998. Disciplinary identity in research writing:Metadiscourse and academic communities [ A ]. In L. Lundquist, H. Picht & J. Qvistgaard ( eds. ). LSP Identity and Interface Research, Knowledge and Society ( Vol. Ⅱ) [ C ]. Copenhagen . CBS.