摘要
目的探讨疼痛控制干预对腰椎间盘突出症患者康复的影响。方法选取2014年1月~12月疼痛科收治的腰椎间盘突出患者共196例,根据数字法随机分为对照组98例与研究组98例。两组患者均常规行牵引针灸、物理治疗并配合腰椎间盘突出相关药物等基础治疗方案、疗程均相同。对照组给予常规护理措施,研究组在常规护理基础上同时进行疼痛控制干预措施。治疗1个月后对比两组患者治疗前后视觉模拟评分（vsual analogue scales,VAS）。VAS评分问卷由患者在10分钟内自行完成,满分为10分,分数越高表示疼痛越重。同时对比两组患者的治疗效果、护理人员服务态度、并发症预防效果、整体预后效果以及满意度。结果两组患者在治疗后VAS疼痛评分均有明显下降,而研究组下降程度较对照组更明显（P〈0.05）;研究组患者对治疗效果、护理人员服务态度、并发症预防效果、整体预后效果以及满意度总分上均显著高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论疼痛控制干预用于腰椎间盘突出患者治疗后康复过程中较常规护理措施效果更佳,患者康复效果更优,可在临床推广应用。
Objective To investigate effect of pain control intervention on rehabilitation of patients with lumbar disc prolapse.Methods 196 patients with lumbar disc,according to the digital method,were randomly divided into control group（98cases）and study group（98cases）.The control group was treated with conventional nursing measures.The study group was treated with pain control intervention measures on the basis of conventional nursing care.The visual analogue scale（vsual analogue scales,VAS）was observed.The curative effect,nurses′service attitude,complication prevention effect,the effect of overall prognosis and satisfaction were analyzed.Results The pain VAS score of the two groups were significantly decreased after treatment.The degree study group decreased more significantly than that of control group（P〈0.05）.Effect,nurses′service attitude,complication prevention effect,overall prognosis effect and satisfaction scores of study group were significantly higher than that of control group（P〈0.05）.Conclusion Pain control in the process of rehabilitation after intervention therapy for patients with lumbar disc treatment has better effect.
出处
《西部医学》
2016年第4期564-566,共3页
Medical Journal of West China
基金
国家自然科学基金(81301668)
关键词
疼痛控制
护理措施
腰椎间盘突出
康复
Pain control
Nursing measures
Lumbar disc herniation
Rehabilitation
