期刊文献+

PubMed数据库撤销论文文献计量分析 被引量:19

Bibliometric analysis of retracted articles in PubMed
原文传递
导出
摘要 【目的】研究PubMed数据库撤销论文总体情况和学术影响,以期提高科研工作者对撤销论文现象的认识和警惕。【方法】提取PubMed中截至2015年5月12日所有被撤销论文的时间、第一作者国别、来源期刊等。【结果】检索到撤销论文3676篇,主要集中在美国、日本、中国、德国和印度。2013年较2000年全球撤销论文数增加约25倍,撤销率增长约12.5倍。我国2013年撤销论文数较2004年增长7倍多。论文撤销后仍会被引用,期刊影响因子主要介于1.0~3.0。【结论】虽然撤销论文具有一定时滞性,但越来越多的论文被撤销在一定程度上遏制了学术不端行为。学术环境的净化需要研究者、编辑部、数据库出版商及相关科研部门等同仁的共同努力与探索。 [Purposes] This paper aims to analyze the general situation and academic influence of retracted articles in Pub Med in order to raise reseachers' awareness and vigilance of this phenomenon. [Methods] We conducted searches through Pub Med to retrieve retracted publications( published before May 12,2015). The time of publication,the first author country and the sourse of journals were extracted. [Findings] Our study finds 3676 retraction articles,which are most from the USA,Japan,China,Germany and India. The quantity of retraction articles in the world had improved 25 times in 2013,and the retraction rate had increased 12. 5 times compared with that of 2000. While,in China,the quantity of retraction articles published in 2013 increased about 7 times compared with that of 2004. Articles after being retracted were still cited,and their journal impact factors were mainly between 1. 0 and 3. 0. [Conclusions] Although scientific publications are retracted with delays,the sharp rise of retracted studies have significant effect on containing academic misconduct. The purification of the academic environment needs efforts and exploration of everyone,including researchers,editors,database publishers and the related research institutions.
出处 《中国科技期刊研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期352-358,共7页 Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals
基金 中国图书馆学会医院图书馆委员会2015-2016年度科学研究基金项目"生物医学出版物自我净化知识图谱"(项目编号:Ytwkyxm15010)
关键词 撤销论文 PUBMED 撤销声明 学术影响 Retracted articles PubMed Retraction notice Academic influence
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

二级参考文献124

  • 1关于加强科研行为规范建设的意见[J].中国科技期刊研究,2007,18(2):204-205. 被引量:24
  • 2National Library of Medicine. Fact sheet. Errata, retractions, partial retractions, corrected and republished articles, duplicatepublications, comments ( including author replies), updates, patient summaries, and republished (reprinted) articles policy for MEDLINE ( updated 04/06/2010). [ 2011-02-11 ]. http ://www. nlm. nih. gov/pubs/factsheets/errata, html.
  • 3[ 2011-03-02 ]. http ://www. nature, corn/nature/authors.
  • 4ACS. Ethical Guidelines to Publication of Chemical Research. [ 2011-03-02 ]. http ://pubs. acs. org/instructYethic, html.
  • 5Anne Victoria Neale, Justin Northrup, Rhonda Dailey, Ellen Marks, Judith Abrams. Correction and use of biomedical literature affected by scientific misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2007. 13 : 5 - 24.
  • 6Murat Cokol, Fath Ozbay. Retraction rates are on the rise. EMBO reports, 2008, 9 ( 1 ) : 2.
  • 7Murat Cokol, et al. How many scientific papers should be retracted? EMBO reports, 2007, 8 (5) : 422 -423.
  • 8Larry D Claxton. Scientific authorship Part 1. A window into scientific fraud.'? Mutation Research, 2005, 589 (1) : 17 -30.
  • 9http ://www. sciencedirect, corn/.
  • 10Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal. [ 2011-03-02 1. http:// elsevier, comZwps/find/intro, cws _ home/ Article% 20Withdrawal.

共引文献108

同被引文献127

  • 1徐红萍.中文学术期刊数据库撤销论文特征分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2023,34(4):519-529. 被引量:8
  • 2吴善超.关于科学道德问题的若干思考[J].学会,2004(6):26-30. 被引量:16
  • 3梁春阳.《哲学研究》引文分析[J].图书馆理论与实践,1989(3):11-15. 被引量:2
  • 4古继宝,张苗,梁皅.中美学术监督典型机构运行体系的对比及经验借鉴[J].中国科技论坛,2007(8):127-131. 被引量:4
  • 5Steen RG. Retractions in the scientific literature:do authors delib- erately commit research fraud [ J ] ? J Med Ethics, 2011,37 ( 2 ) : 113-117.
  • 6Steen RG, Casadevall A, Fang F C. Why has the number of sci- entific retractions increased[ J]. PLoS One,2013,8(7 ) :e68397.
  • 7Singh HP, Mahendra A, Yadav B, et al. A comprehensive analysis of articles retracted between 2004 and 2013 from biomedical liter- ature a call for reforms[ J]. J Tradit Complement Med ,2014,4(3):136-139.
  • 8Chen CM, Hu Z G, Milbank J, et al. A visual analytic study of re- tracted articles in scientific literature [ J ]. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol, 2013,64 ( 2 ) : 234-253.
  • 9Madlock-Brown C R,Eichmann D. The (lack of) impact of re- traction citation networks[ J]. Sci Eng Ethics,2015,21 ( 1 ) :127- 137.
  • 10Fang FC, Casadevall A. Retracted science and the retraction index [J]. Infect Immun,2011,79(10) : 3855-3859.

引证文献19

二级引证文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部