期刊文献+

常规矫正与微型种植体支抗用于口腔正畸临床对比研究 被引量:18

Clinical Comparative Analysis of Conventional Correction and Micro Implant Anchorage in Orthodontics
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨常规矫正与微型种植体支抗用于口腔正畸临床效果。方法随机选取该院2013年5月—2015年5月收治行口腔正畸治疗患者150例,采用随机数字表法分为对照组(75例)和观察组(75例),分别采用常规矫正与微型种植体支抗治疗;比较两组患者临床疗效和治疗前后上下颌牙齿测量情况。结果对照组和观察组患者治疗总有效率分别为77.33%(58/75),98.67%(74/75);观察组患者临床疗效显著优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者治疗后L1-MP和U1-SN水平均显著优于对照组、治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论相较于常规矫正,微型种植体支抗用于口腔正畸可有效提高临床效果,促进上下切牙角度恢复。 Objective To discuss the difference of clinical effect of conventional correction and micro implant anchorage in orthodontics. Methods 150 cases of patients receiving orthodontics in our hospital from May 2013 to May 2015 were selected and randomly divided two groups with 75 cases in each, the control group were given conventional correction, the observation group were given micro implant anchorage treatment, the clinical curative effects and the upper and lower jaw dental measurement conditions before and after treatment of the two groups were compared. Results The total treatment effective rate in the control group and in the observation group were respectively 77.33%(58/75)and 98.67%(74/75);the clinical curative effect in the observation group was obviously better than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05), the L1-MP level and U1-SN level after treatment in the observation group were obviously better than those in the control group and before treatment, the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion Compared with conventional correction, micro implant anchorage in treatment of orthodontics can effectively improve the clinical effect and promote the recovery of upper and lower incisors angle.
作者 刘龙坤
出处 《中外医疗》 2016年第2期57-58,61,共3页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 微型种植体 支抗 口腔正畸 疗效 Micro implant Anchorage Orthodontics Curative effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献91

共引文献142

同被引文献58

引证文献18

二级引证文献95

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部