期刊文献+

SF-36量表对髋膝关节置换术后患者健康情状评估的应用 被引量:30

Application of SF-36 scales for evaluation of health status in patients with total knee and hip replacement
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的介绍SF-36评分系统应用于人工关节置换术患者以评估其健康状况。方法入选2012年至2014年58例全髋关节置换患者(total hip replacement,THR),131例全膝关节置换患者(total knee replacement,TKR),分别于术前和术后6个月使用SF-36量表,Harris量表(THR患者),膝关节学会评分(Knee Society Score,KSS)量表(TKR患者)对患者进行评估;并对评分结果进行Pearson相关分析。结果最终获得THR完整随访53例,TKR完整随访124例,相关性检验显示36条目健康调查量表(36-Item Short-Form Health Survey,SF-36)与Harris量表及KSS量表均呈显著性正相关关系(双侧,P<0.01)。结论 SF-36量表能够较好的反映人工关节置换术后患者健康状况包括生理和心理两方面的变化,应用于此类患者具有相当的效度和信度。 Objective To introduce the application of the MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey( SF-36) scales for evaluation of health status in patients with total joint replacement( TJR). Methods We enrolled 58 patients with total hip replacement( THR),131 patients with total knee replacement( TKR) from 2012 to 2014. All were assessed using SF-36,and still THRs and TKRs were assessed via Harris score and Knee Society Score( KSS),before surgery and 6 months after TJR,respectively. The scores were analyzed by Pearson's correlation analysis. Results We obtained 53 complete follow-ups of THR and 124 of TKR. The results showed good positive correlation both between SF-36 score and Harris score,and between SF-36 score and KSS score( two-tailed,P〈0. 01). Conclusion SF-36 scales could reflect changes of health status,including physical and psychological aspects in patient with TJR,and showed good validity and reliability.
出处 《首都医科大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第6期974-977,共4页 Journal of Capital Medical University
关键词 36条目健康调查表量 人工关节置换术 健康状况 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey artificial joint replacement health status
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Mc Carthy M,Conceio C,Grimaud O,et al.Competitive funding and structures for public health research in European countries[J].Eur J Public Health,2013,23(Suppl 2):39-42.
  • 2Goodman S M,Ramsden-Stein D N,Huang W T,et al.Patients with rheumatoid arthritis are more likely to have pain and poor function after total hip replacements than patients with osteoarthritis[J].J Rheumatol,2014,41(9):1774-1780.
  • 3Cipriano L E,Chesworth B M,Anderson C K,et al.Predicting joint replacement waiting times[J].Health Care Manag Sci,2007,10(2):195-215.
  • 4Bert J M,Gross M,Kline C.Outcome results after total knee arthroplasty:does the patient's physical and mental health improve?[J].Am J Knee Surg,2000,13(4):223-227.
  • 5Ko Y L,Wu H F,Lin P C,et al.A survey of patients'quality of life and health-care needs prior to undergoing total joint replacement surgery[J].Int J Nurs Pract,2013,19(4):415-422.
  • 6Niu N N,Collins J E,Thornhill T S,et al.Pre-operative statusand quality of life following total joint replacement in a developing country:a prospective pilot study[J].Open Orthop J,2011,5:307-314.
  • 7Sderman P,Malchau H.Validity and reliability of Swedish WOMAC osteoarthritis index:a self-administered diseasespecific questionnaire(WOMAC)versus generic instruments(SF-36 and NHP)[J].Acta Orthop Scand,2000,71(1):39-46.
  • 8Hawker G,Melfi C,Paul J,et al.Comparison of a generic(SF-36)and a disease specific WOMAC(Western Ontario and Master Universities Osteoarthritis Index)instrument in the measurement of outcomes after knee replacement surgery[J].J Rheumatol,1995,22(6):1193-1196.
  • 9Kiebzak G M,Vain P A,Gregory A M,et al.SF-36 general health status survey to determine patient satisfaction at short-term follow-up after total hip and knee arthroplasty[J].J South Orthop Assoc,1997,6(3):169-172.
  • 10马建超,史伟,王文健,章斌,夏运风,梁馨苓,叶智明,何朝生,刘双信.血液透析患者生活质量SF-36量表调查及相关影响因素分析[J].广东医学,2007,28(12):2007-2009. 被引量:22

二级参考文献38

  • 1李启祥,杨立新,桑双进,张则正.人工股骨头置换术治疗老年人股骨颈骨折的疗效评价[J].首都医科大学学报,2004,25(2):256-258. 被引量:3
  • 2毛宾尧,陆勇,胡裕桐,应忠追.人工股骨头置换治疗高龄股骨转子间骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2004,6(9):1053-1055. 被引量:164
  • 3何安民.空心螺钉内固定治疗老年股骨颈骨折23例体会[J].临床误诊误治,2006,19(3):28-28. 被引量:1
  • 4国家统计局人口与就业司.中国人口统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,1997.4-6.
  • 5国家统计局人口与就业司,中国人口统计年鉴,1997年,4页
  • 6ZHANG A H, CHENG LT, ZHU N, et al. Comparison of quality of life and causes of hospitalization between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients in China[ J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2007, 5(1): 49.
  • 7WARE J, QANDEK B. Overview of SF -36 health survey and the international quality of life assessment(IQOLA) project[ J]. J Clin EPidemiol, 1998, 51 ( 11 ) : 903 -912.
  • 8DETSKY A S, MCLAUGHLIN J R, BAKER J P, et al. What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status [ J ]. JPEN, 1987, 11(1): 8-13.
  • 9MITFAL S K, AHERNL, FLASTER E, et al. Self-assessed physical and mental function of haemodialysis patients[ J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2001, 16(7) : 1387 -1394.
  • 10MINGARDI G, COMALBA L, CORTINOVIS E, et al. A report from Italian study using SF -36 Health Survey [ J ]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 1999, 14:1503-1510.

共引文献462

同被引文献269

引证文献30

二级引证文献189

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部