摘要
股东代表诉讼制度于中国发轫未久,在制度安排上多有相容性差、可诉性缺失等不适反应,究其根源,并非单纯的商事实体法与程序法未得对接,而是源自法律移植的制度理论之内核尚存疑虑。在理论进路上,由股东代表诉讼之权源基础展开分析,阐明股东诉权非为"派生权利"而是由公司契约安排所得之原权利,是股东监督权的延展,并以此为据对股东代表诉讼前置程序价值基础进行探讨,厘清"穷尽公司内部救济"规则下的制度演绎路径,进而提出双轨制的股东代表诉讼程序设想。
The system of shareholder representative litigation appeared in China before long. There are a number of unhealthy reactions to the function of the system, such as bad system compatibility and deficiency of suability. These problems are not sim- ply caused by the less of connection between the substantive law and procedural law, but by the fact that the basic theory is not convincing enough which came from transplantation of law. This paper analyses the source of the right to claim shareholder repre- sentative litigation, and illuminates that the right of action enjoyed by shareholders is the original right grown out of company con- tract and part of the right of supervision, instead of ＂derivative right＂. Moreover, it discusses the value of prepositional procedure of shareholder representative litigation. By clearing the deduction about the rule of ＂exhaustion of internal remedies＂ we propose the idea of dual track procedure of shareholder representative litigation.
出处
《学术探索》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第12期88-95,共8页
Academic Exploration
基金
2014年西南政法大学研究生科研创新计划资助项目(XZYJS2014014)
西南政法大学2014年度科研青年项目(2014XZQN-21)
关键词
股东代表诉讼
前置程序
内部救济
shareholder representative litigation
prepositional procedure
internal remedies
