期刊文献+

两种护理方式在胸腰椎骨折患者护理过程中的疼痛效果比较 被引量:1

Two methods of pain treatment effect in nursing process of patients with thoracolumbar fractures
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨轴式滚动移位法和传统平抬搬运法护理胸腰椎骨折患者的疼痛影响,比较其效果,指导临床护理工作。方法将40例患者分为观察组和对照组,每组各20例。观察组采用轴式滚动移位法,对照组采用传统的2-3人搬运患者法,两组患者均采用心理疏导,消除紧张,缓解患者心理压力。比较两组患者搬运前后疼痛变化情况,对两组患者进行满意度调查。结果采用轴式滚动移位法和传统搬运法搬运患者的疼痛评分比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=1.973,P〈0.05);轴式滚动移位法搬运患者的满意度为90.0%(18/21),优于传统搬运法的65.0%(13/21),差异有统计学意义(χ^2=14.547,P=0.000)。结论采用轴式滚动移位法搬运患者可减轻搬运过程中疼痛,提高了患者对护理服务的满意度,是一种理想的护理方式。 Objective To investigate the rolling shaft displacement method and traditional flat lift handling care act thoracolumbar fractures affect pain patients, compare its results to guide clinical care.Methods The 40 patients were divided into two groups and the control group,20 cases in each group.Observation group rolling shaft displacement method,the control group using the traditional method of 2 - 3peoples handling patients,two groups of patients were treated with psychological counseling,eliminate stress,relieve mental stress. Two groups were compared before and after handling the pain changes,two groups of patients satisfaction surveys. Results Axial displacement method using rolling and handling patient handling traditional method of pain scores,the difference was statistically significant( Z = 1. 973,P〈0. 05); scroll handling patient satisfaction shaft displacement method was 90. 0%( 18 /21),65. 0% better than( 13 /21)traditional method of transportation,the difference was statistically significant( χ^2= 14. 547,P = 0. 000).Conclusions Scroll using the shaft displacement method can reduce patient handling during transportation pain,and improve patients' satisfaction with care,and is an ideal way of care.
作者 钱富敏
出处 《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》 2015年第28期4323-4325,共3页 Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
关键词 轴式滚动移位法 胸腰椎骨折 疼痛 满意度 Rolling carry method Thoracotumbar fractures Pain Satisfaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献45

共引文献251

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部