期刊文献+

丙泊酚治疗难治性癫痫持续状态疗效及安全性的Meta分析 被引量:3

A Meta-analysis on efficacy and safety of propofol for refractory status epilepticus
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨丙泊酚治疗难治性癫痫持续状态(RSE)的疗效及安全性。方法 计算机检索CBM(1985~2014.7)、Wan Fang Data(1982~2014.7)、VIP(1989~2014.7)、CNKI(1979~2014.7)、Pub Med(1966~2014.7)、Embase(1974~2014.7),根据纳入、排除标准选择有关丙泊酚治疗RSE的对照试验,并提取有效数据,采用Rev Man 5.3软件进行分析。结果 共纳入5个有效研究,合计111例患者。Meta分析结果显示,丙泊酚组治疗RSE的癫痫控制率总体上优于对照组(OR=2.44,95%CI:1.05~5.66,P=0.04),但二者死亡率的差异无统计学意义(OR=1.19,95%CI:0.55~2.61,P=0.66)。结论 丙泊酚可有效控制RSE发作,但并不降低其死亡率。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of propofol for refractory statue epilepticus( RSE).Methods Controlled trials associated with RSE were searched from the database of CBM( 1985- 2014. 7),Wan Fang( 1982- 2014. 7),VIP( 1989- 2014. 7),CNKI( 1979- 2014. 7),Pub Med( 1966- 2014. 7),Embase( 1974- 2014. 7),and the related references were picked up by inclusion and exculsion criteria and traced to obtain the information. Meta-analysis was performed using Rev Man 5. 3 software. Results Totally 5 studies involving 111 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that the epilepsy control rate of propofol group on treating RSE was significantly more effective than control group( OR = 2. 44,95% CI: 1. 05- 5. 66,P = 0. 04). However,the mortality was no statistical difference( OR = 1. 19,95% CI: 0. 55- 2. 61,P = 0. 66). Conclusion Propofol is effective to control RSE,but can not reduce its mortality rate.
出处 《临床神经病学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第5期338-340,共3页 Journal of Clinical Neurology
关键词 丙泊酚 巴比妥类 咪达唑仑 难治性癫痫持续状态 META分析 propofol barbiturates midazolam refractory status epilepticus Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献11

  • 1[6]Harr ison AM, Lugo RA, Schunk JE. Treatment of convulsive status epilepticus with propofol: a case report [ J ]. Pediatr Emerg Care,1997,13(3) :420 ~ 2.
  • 2[7]Krishnamurthy KB, Drislane FW: Depth of EEG suppression and outcome in barbiturate anesthetic treatment for refractory status epilepticus[J]. Epilepsia, 1999,40(6): 759 ~ 62.
  • 3[8]Rossetti AO, Reichhart, Schaller: Propofol treatment of refractory status epilepticus: a study of 31 episodes [ J ]. Epilepsia, 2004,45(7): 757 ~ 63.
  • 4[1]Classen J, Hirsch LJ, Emerson RG, et al. Treatment of refractory status epilepticus with propof ol, entobarbital or midazolam: a systematic review[J]. Epilepsia,2002,43(2): 146 ~ 53.
  • 5[2]Borgeat A. Propofol: pro-or anticonvulsant? [J] Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl, 1997,15(2): 17 ~ 20.
  • 6[3]Reiman DM, Meyers PD, Walton NY: A comparison of four treatments for generalized convulsive status epilepticus. Veterans Affairs Status Epilepticus Cooperative Study Group [see comments] [J]. N Engl J Med, 1998, 339(12): 792 ~ 8.
  • 7[4]Brown LA, Levin GM. Role of propofol in RSE[J]. Ann Pharmacother,1998,32(4): 1053 ~ 9.
  • 8[5]Stecker MM, Kramer TH, Raps EC, et al. Treatment of refractory status epilepticus with propofol: clinical and pharmacokinetic findings[J]. Epilepsia, 1998,39( 1 ): 18 ~ 26.
  • 9陈蕾,周波,李劲梅,朱燚,周东.惊厥性癫痫持续状态患者220例的临床特征[J].中华神经科杂志,2008,41(11):748-750. 被引量:5
  • 10洪震.非惊厥性癫痫持续状态的治疗专家共识[J].中华神经科杂志,2013,46(2):133-137. 被引量:47

共引文献23

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部