基于公共与非公共检索计算机的OPAC检索行为比较研究被引量：4

A Comparative Study on OPAC Searching Behaviors Based on Public and Non-public Computers

导出

摘要 [目的 /意义]探讨用户在公共检索和非公共检索计算机上进行OPAC检索的行为共性与差异。[方法/过程]以北京师范大学图书馆OPAC日志数据为例,对图书馆内公共检索计算机和馆外典型非公共检索计算机产生的日志信息进行分析,从基本特征、一次检索会话内的检索行为特征两方面,对两类计算机用户的OPAC检索行为进行比较。[结果 /结论]公共检索计算机用户与非公共检索计算机用户在关键检索行为的表现上具有高度的一致性,包括检索点与高级检索功能的使用、一次检索会话内的提问调整方式等。同时,两类用户在一次检索会话的提问次数、持续时间、两次检索会话时间间隔等方面表现出差异。 [ Purpose/significance]This paper discusses the generalities and differences of OPAC searching behaviors between public and non-public computers. [ Method/process] By distinguishing the OPAC users log data between the public and non-pubfic computers in Beijing Normal University, it compares the searching behaviors from aspects of the overall characteristics and search behavior characteristics in a searching session. [ Result/conclusion] The findings indicates that the key searching behaviors between two kinds of users are highly consistent, including the search points, the use of advanced search functions and query adjustment strategy employed in a searching session. Meanwhile, some significant differences between them are discovered, including the frequency of queries and the duration time in one searching session, and the time interval between two sessions.

作者黄崑张路路郭建峰

机构地区北京师范大学政府管理学院

出处《图书情报工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第14期103-110,142,共9页 Library and Information Service

基金中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目"基于日志的高校图书馆用户检索行为研究"(项目编号:310422101)研究成果之一

关键词 OPAC 检索行为提问调整内容分析 OPAC searching behavior query adjustment content analysis

分类号 TP391.3 [自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术] G252.7 [文化科学—图书馆学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献22

1Rice R E, Borgman C L. The use of computer-monitored data in information science and communication research[ J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1983, 34 (4) : 247 - 256.
2黄崑,张路路,郭建峰.基于用户视角的OPAC研究述评[J].图书情报知识,2015,32(1):77-85. 被引量：3
3Mellon C A. Library anxiety: A grounded theory and its develop- ment[J]. College & Research Libraries, 1986, 47(2): 160 - 165.
4Bostick S L. The development and validation of the hbrary anxiety scale [ D ]. Detroit : Wayne State University, 1992.
5Jiao Q G, Onwuegbuzie A J. Reading ability as a predictor of li- brary anxiety [ J ]. Library Review, 2003, 52 (4) : 159 - 169.
6Swigofi M. Library anxiety among Polish students : Development and validation of the Polish Library Anxiety Scale[ J ]. Library & Infor- mation Seience Research, 2011,33 (2) : 144 -150.
7Kelly D, Gyllstrom K. An examination of two delivery modes for in- teractive search system experiments : Remote and laboratory [ C]// Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Com- puting Systems. Vancouver:ACM, 2011 : 1531 - 1540.
8Wolfram D. Traditional IR for Web users : A context for general au- dience digital libraries[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2002, 38(5): 627-648.
9Cboi Y, Rasmussen E M. Users' relevance criteria in image re- trieval in American history [ J] . Information Processing & Manage- ment, 2002, 38(5): 695-726.
10李月琳,刘冰凌.中美网络用户信息搜寻行为比较研究:基于跨文化视角[J].情报理论与实践,2015,38(3):116-121. 被引量：8