期刊文献+

罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞用于剖宫产术后镇痛的临床效果 被引量:1

Effect of transversus abdominis plane block with ropivacaine on clinical efficacy of postoperative analgesia in puerpera undergoing cesarean section
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价罗哌卡因腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞用于剖宫产术后镇痛的临床效果。方法选择择期在腰麻下行剖宫产术的产妇90例,采用随机数字表法分为3组(n=30):生理盐水组(A组)、0.20%罗哌卡因组(B组)和0.25%罗哌卡因组(C组)。B组和C组术毕均在超声引导下行双侧TAP阻滞,每一侧分别注入0.20%、0.25%罗哌卡因各20mL,而A组给予等容量生理盐水。同时使用经静脉患者自控镇痛(PCIA)。分别于术后2、4、8、12、24、48h各时点记录疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Ramsay镇静评分及舒适度(BCS)评分。记录产妇术后48h内PCIA中舒芬太尼用量、单次自控镇痛(PCA)平均按压次数、产妇镇痛总体满意度及TAP阻滞相关的不良反应发生率。结果与A组比较,B、C组术后不同时点VAS评分均降低(P<0.05),而BCS评分均升高(P<0.05);B、C组术后不同时点VAS评分及BCS评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与A组比较,B、C组术后48h内单次PCA平均按压次数及PCIA中舒芬太尼用量均减少(P<0.05),而术后48h内镇痛总体满意度升高(P<0.012 5)。3组产妇术后48h内均未发生TAP阻滞相关的不良反应。结论 0.20%及0.25%罗哌卡因TAP阻滞用于剖宫产产妇术后镇痛的临床效果均较好,且不良反应较少,安全性较高。 Objective To explore the effect of transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) with ropivacaine on clinical effi cacy of postoperative analgesia in puerpera undergoing cesarean section. Methods Ninety puerpera scheduled for cesarean sec- tion under spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into three groups (n-- 30 each) : normal saline group (group A), 0.20% ropivacaine group (group B) and 0.25% ropivacaine group (group C). After surgery, ultrasound guided TAP block was per- formed in two sides, and 20 mL of 0.20% and 0.25% ropivacaine was injected respectively in each side in group B and group C, while ropivacaine was instead of normal saline at the same volume in group C. The three groups all received patient controlled in- travenous analgesia (PCIA) after operation. The score of visual analogue scale (VAS), Ramsay sedation score and bruggemann comfort scale (BCS) score were evaluated respectively at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h after operation. The consumption of sufen- tanil in PC1A and the average press number of patient controlled analgesia (PCA) were both recorded within 48 h after opera- tion. The analgesic effect overall satisfaction of puerpera and adverse reactions associated with TAP block were also recorded within 48 h after operation. Results Compared with group A, VAS score were all lower (P〈0.05), but BCS score were all higher (P〈0.05) at different time points after operation in group B and C. There was no statistically significant differences (all P〉0.05) in VAS score and BCS score at different time points after operation between group B and C. Compared with group A, the consumption of sufentanil in PCIA and the average press number of PCA were lower (both P〈0.05), however, the analge- sic effect overall satisfaction of puerperal was higher (P〈0. 012 5) within 48 h after operation in group B and C. There was no adverse reactions associated with TAP block in the three groups. Conclusion TAP with ropivacaine at the concentrations of O. 20% and O. 25 % is effective and safe in postoperative analgesia after cesarean section, with less adverse reaction.
出处 《福建医药杂志》 CAS 2015年第4期74-77,共4页 Fujian Medical Journal
关键词 罗哌卡因 腹横肌平面阻滞 术后镇痛 剖宫产 ropivacaine transversus abdominis plane block postoperative analgesia cesarean section
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献81

  • 1李金彪.腰-硬联合麻醉在超高龄患者髋关节置换术中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(9):716-716. 被引量:59
  • 2夏云.目前产科麻醉中的热点讨论[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2007,28(4):380-384. 被引量:45
  • 3Borglum J, Maschmann C, Belhage B, et al. Ultrasound - guided bilateral dual transversus abdominis plane block: a new four point approach [ J ] . Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2011, 55 (6): 658-663.
  • 4Bharti N, Kumar P, Bala I, et al. The efficacy of a novel ap- proach to transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after colorectal surgery [ J ] . Anesth Analg, 2011, 112 (6) : 1504 - 1508.
  • 5Abdallah FW, Laffey JG, Halpern SH, et al. Duration of an- algesic effectiveness after the posterior and !ateral transverses abdominis plane block techniques for transverse lower abdomi- nal incisions: a meta - analysis [J ] . Br J Anaesth, 2013, 111 (5) : 721 -735.
  • 6Sharma P, Chand T, Saxena A, et al. Evaluation of postoper- ative analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block af- ter abdominal surgery: a comparative study [ J ] . J Nat Sci Biol Med, 2013, 4 (1): 177-180.
  • 7Wildgaard K, Pefersen RIt, Hansen HJ, et al. Multimodal analgesic treatment in video - assisted thoracic surgery lobecto- my using an intraoperative intercostal catheter [ J ] Eur J Car- diothorac Surg, 2012, 41 (5) : 1072 - 1077.
  • 8Gasanova I, Granf E, Way M, et al. Ultrasound- guided trat)s versus abdominal plane block with multimodal analgesia for pain management after total abdominal hysterectomy [ J ] . Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2013, 288 '(1) : 105 - 111.
  • 9McDonnell JG,O'Donnell BD,Farrell T. Transversus abdominis plane block.:a cadaveric and radiological evaluation[J].{H}Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine,2007,(05):399-404.
  • 10Pan PH. Post cesarean delivery pain management:multimodal approach[J].IntJObstet Anesth,2006,(03):185-188.

共引文献919

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部