摘要
目的对比分析胃癌术后不同胃肠减压方式对胃肠功能恢复的影响。方法选取2014年5月~2015年4月期间在我院行胃癌根治术的胃癌患者103例分成两组;研究组（51例）实施无负压自然引流胃肠减压,对照组（52例）实施持续负压吸引胃肠减压,比较两组患者术后3 d平均每日胃液引流量、术后恢复情况、不良反应发生率及并发症发生率。结果研究组排气时间、胃管留置时间、术后住院时间与对照组比较均明显较短,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;研究组术后3 d平均每日胃液引流量、不良反应总发生率及并发症总发生率与对照组比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论胃癌术后给予无负压自然引流胃肠减压效果较好,引流量与持续负压吸引胃肠减压相近,但可促进患者康复,缩短住院时间,可在临床推广应用。
Objective To compare the effect of gastrointestinal function recovery of Gastric surgery treated Different ways Gastrointestinal decompression. Methods A total of 103 cases with gastric cancer patients were collected from May 2014 to April 2015 in our hospital for radical gastrectomy, all the patients were divided into two groups, there were 51 cases in the study group,all of them implemented no negative natural drainage decompression, there were 52 cases in the control group, all of them implemented continuous suction decompression. The postoperative gastric 3 d daily average drainage,postoperative recovery,adverse reaction rates and complication rates of two groups were com-pared. Results In the study group,the exhaust time,stomach retention time,postoperative hospital stay time were sig-nificantly shorter than the control group, the difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）. There was no significant difference in 3d average daily gastric drainage, the overall incidence of adverse reactions and the overall incidence of complications between the study group and the control group （P〉0.05）. Conclusion After giving no negative gastric decompression better natural drainage, drainage and continuous suction decompression similar, but can promote the rehabilitation of patients,shorter hospital stay,clinical application can be in.
出处
《中国现代医生》
2015年第19期74-75,79,共3页
China Modern Doctor
基金
胜利石油管理局科学技术委员会科技进步计划(200846078)
关键词
胃癌
胃肠减压
胃肠功能
Gastric
Gastrointestinal decompression
Gastrointestinal function
