摘要
20世纪30年代,法国图谋控制南海海权,遂挑起"南海九小岛事件",引发了中法、中日之间的南沙交涉,这是性质完全不同的两种交涉。国民政府虽证据确凿,但由于国力衰落未能从根本上改变交涉中的被动局面,致使该问题久拖不决,最终酿成中越南沙争端之源。日本的南沙谋利行为与法国发生了碰撞,两国以牺牲中国利益为代价调整相互关系,形成了"共存"南沙的局面,然而它们在南海存在的时间都不长,未构成领土归属的历史或法理根据。此时的南海局势,在一定程度上反映出列强在东南亚、南海地区的力量格局的演变。
In the 1930 s,in order to control the South China Sea,France government occupied some of the Spratly Islands,resulting in two disparate negotiations between China and France,and China and Japan.Due to its weak national strength,despite that the Republic of China government had solid evidence,it could not but postpone the discussion over this issue,foreshadowing the Spratly Islands dispute between China and Vietnam.On the other hand,the expansion of Japan to the Spratly Islands collided with the interest of France.As a result,they ignored the request of China,and formed an adjusted relation of 'coexistence' in the South China Sea.Nevertheless,their temporary control could not provide historical or legal foundation for resolving the territory dispute.This affair reflected the distribution and fluctuation of strengths of the great powers in the South China Sea and Southeast Asia.
出处
《世界历史》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第3期87-97,159,共11页
World History
