摘要
目的探究骨水泥治疗胸腰椎压缩性骨折的临床效果观察。方法随机选取我院的胸腰椎压缩性骨折患者126例,将其分为A组和B组,A组采取手术方法,B组则用传统治疗方法。结果对比两组患者临床表现,发现两组数据间具有差异性,A组优于B组,且其差异性具有统计学意义,P<0.05。结论通过对两组患者治疗效果的观察,两组患者的治疗效果无统计学差异(P>0.05),但两种疗法各有利弊,患者可结合自身情况进行选择。
Objective To observe the clinical effect of inquiry bone cement for the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures. MethodsSelected 126 cases of thoracolumbar fracture patients in our hospital, randomly divided into A group and B group, A group adopt to surgical, B group were treated with traditional treatment methods.Results Compared with the two groups to the clinical manifestations, A group was better than B group, and the difference had statistical significance, P〈0.05.Conclusion Observation the treatment of two groups, no difference had statistical significance, two treatments each have advantages and disadvantages, the patient can combine their own situation to choose.
出处
《中国继续医学教育》
2015年第10期60-61,共2页
China Continuing Medical Education
关键词
骨水泥
胸腰椎
压缩性骨折
临床效果
Bone cement
Thoracolumbar vertebram
Compression fracture
Clinical effect
