期刊文献+

两种局部麻醉方法应用于下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术的比较 被引量:3

Comparison of two anesthesia methods in mandibular impacted third molar exodontia
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较下颌高、中位阻生第三磨牙拔除的患者应用无痛口腔局麻仪行牙周膜注射与卡局芯式注射器行下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉注射的麻醉效果。方法随机选择50例行双侧下颌高、中位阻生第三磨牙拔除术的成人患者,同一患者左右侧随机归入试验组和对照组。试验组应用无痛口腔局麻仪行阻生牙牙周膜局部浸润麻醉,对照组应用卡局芯式注射器行下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉,患者本人对两种麻醉方式的注射疼痛程度及效果进行评价。结果两组比较,试验组麻醉注射时疼痛的视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)值为2.48±0.98,对照组为6.12±0.44,差异有统计学意义(t=3.501,P<0.01)。麻醉效果试验组患者自评为"优"者44例,对照组为35例,两组差异无统计学意义(H=2.833,P=0.812)。结论应用无痛口腔局麻仪行牙周膜局部浸润麻醉更有利于下颌高、中位阻生牙拔除术中的无痛操作。 Objective To compare the effects of two local anesthetic methods (single tooth anesthesia anti conven- tional inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia) for the extraction of mandibular impaeted third molar ( M3 ). Methods A total of 50 patients received M3 extraction surgery were randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group (50 cases, same patient, left or right) received single tooth anesthesia (STA), and the control group (50 cases, same pa- tient, left or right) underwent inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia. Patients' blood pressure and heart rate were meas-ured at various time intervals for the two groups. The value of visual analogue scale (VAS) was recorded and evaluated. Results A higher VAS value and increased blood pressure were observed in the control group, but not in the experimen- tal one. Conclusion Periodontal ligament injection with STA system yielded a significantly low pain score than conven- tional inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia.
出处 《广东牙病防治》 2015年第2期100-102,共3页 Journal of Dental Prevention and Treatment
基金 广东省科技计划项目(2013B021800139)
关键词 局部麻醉 下颌阻生第三磨牙 无痛 牙拔除术局部麻醉 阻生牙 拔牙 Local anesthesia Mandibular impacted third molar Pain free Tooth extraction Anesthesia, local Tooth,impacted Tooth extraction
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1仇金泉,徐平平.疼痛因素对学龄前儿童乳牙拔除术中畏惧心理的影响[J].广东牙病防治,2009,17(2):83-85. 被引量:5
  • 2Gaffar BO, Alagl AS, AI-Ansari AA. The prevalence, causes, and rolativity of dental anxiety in adult patients to irregular dental visits [J]. Saudi Med J, 2014,35(6) :598-603.
  • 3Hogan ME, Vandervaart S, Perampaladas K, et al. Systematic re- view and meta-analysis of the effect of warming local anesthetics on injection pain[J]. Ann Emerg Med, 2011,58(l).86-98.
  • 4Lima C J, Silva LC, Melo MR, et al. Evaluation of the agreement by examiners according to classifications of third molars[ J ]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2012,17(2) :281-286.
  • 5Kuehhas FE, Miernik A, Sharma V, et al. A prospective evaluation of pain assnciatcd with stone passage, stents, and steni removal nsing a visual analog scale[ J ]. Urology, 2013,82 ( 3 ) :521-525.
  • 6van Wijk A, Lindcboom JA, de Jongh A, et al. Pain rclaled to nmn- dibular bh::'k injections and its rolationship with anxiety and previous experiences with dental anesthetics [ J ]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral I'athoI Oral Radiol, 2012,114(5 Suppl) : 114-119.
  • 7Kudo M. Initial injection pressure fiJr dental local anesthesia: effects on pain and anxiety [ J ]. Anesth Prog, 2005,52 (3) :95-101.
  • 8曾桂琼,吴幕廉,柯惜珠,刘齐英.计算机控制局部麻醉系统注射对拔牙患者疼痛、血压及心率的影响[J].广东牙病防治,2010,18(7):386-388. 被引量:5
  • 9Kroehak M, Friedman N. Using a precision-metered injection system to minimize dental injection anxiety [ J ]. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 1998,19 ( 2 ) : 137-140.
  • 10杨勤,杨素真,张国金,郑晖.牙周韧带注射对下颌磨牙牙髓麻醉效果的临床观察[J].广东牙病防治,2013,21(2):85-87. 被引量:6

二级参考文献18

共引文献13

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部