期刊文献+

BiPAP无创通气在治疗32例COPD并呼吸衰竭(Ⅱ型)的临床疗效观察 被引量:3

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 选取我院2012年4月~2014年1月收治入院的62例COPD并发呼吸衰竭的患者,随机分为观察组32例和对照组30例。观察组患者采取临床常规治疗联合BiPAP无创通气法治疗,对照组采取临床常规治疗。比较两组患者的动脉血中PaCO2、PaO2、pH以及呼吸频率和心率的变化。结果两组对比,观察组患者的患者在治疗后,PaO2明显高于对照组,PaCO2、呼吸频率和心率明显低于对照组,其差异在统计学上具有意义(P<0.05);pH变化无显著差异,不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。对于临床中COPD并发呼吸衰竭(Ⅱ型)的患者行BiPAP无创通气法治疗,治疗效果显著,可行性高,患者治疗后症状缓解明显,恢复好,值得推广。
作者 张元汉
机构地区 揭西县人民医院
出处 《现代诊断与治疗》 CAS 2014年第15期3550-3551,共2页 Modern Diagnosis and Treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献30

共引文献86

同被引文献32

  • 1Sweet DG,Carnielli V,Greisen G,et al.European consensus guidelines on the management of neonatal respiratory dis- tress syndrome in preterm infants-2013 update[J].Neona- tology, 2013,103 (4) : 353-368.
  • 2Sai Sunil Kishore M, Dutta S, Kumar P.Early nasal intermit- tent positive pressure ventilation versus continuous posi- tive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Acta Paediatr, 2009,98 (9) : 1412-1415.
  • 3Leone F,Trevisanuto D,Cavallin F,et al.Efficacy of IN- SURE during nasal CPAP in preterm infants with respira- tory distress syndrome[J].Minerva Pediatr,2013,65 (2):187- 192.
  • 4Kirpalani H,Millar D,Lemyre B,et al.A trial comparing noninvasive ventilation strategies in preterm infants [J].N Engl J Med ,2013,369(7) :611-620.
  • 5Tang S,Zhao J,Shen J,et al.Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasalcontinuous positive airway pressure in neonates:a systematic review and meta-analy- sis[J].Indian Pediatr, 2013,50 (4) : 371-376.
  • 6O'Brien K,Campbell C ,Brown L,et al.Infant flow biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BP-NCPAP) vs. infant flow NCPAP for the facilitation of extubation in infants' ≤ 1,250 grams :a randomized controlled trial[J]. BMC Pediatr,2012,12:43.
  • 7Ramanathan R,Sekar KC, Rasmussen M,et al.Nasal inter- mittent positive pressure ventilation after surfactant treat-ment for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants < 30 weeks' gestation :a randomized,controlled trial [J].J Perinatol, 2012,32 (5) : 336-343.
  • 8Lista G,Castoldi F, Fontana P,et al.Nasal continuous pos- itive airway pressure (CPAP)versus bi-level nasal CPAP in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome:a randomised control trial[J].Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2010,95 (2) :F85-F89.
  • 9Kieran EA,Twomey AR,Molloy EJ,et al.Randomized trial of prongs or mask for nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants[J].Pediatrics, 2012,130 (5) : e1170-e1176.
  • 10Victor S,Extubate Trial Group.EXTUBATE :a randomised controlled trial of nasal biphasic positive airway pressure vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure following extubation in infants less than 30 weeks' gestation:study protocol for a randomised controlled trial[J].Trials ,2011, 12 : 257-264.

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部