摘要
目的:观察中西医结合治疗急性气管-支气管炎的临床疗效。方法:将102例急性气管-支气管炎痰热壅肺证患者随机分为观察组和对照组各52例。对照组给予吸氧、吸痰、补液、抗病毒感染等常规治疗,静脉滴注地塞米松、青霉素钠注射液。观察组在对照组治疗的基础上给予清热化痰、平喘止咳的中药治疗。比较2组的临床疗效和不良反应情况。结果:对照组总有效率为70.6%,观察组总有效率为90.2%,2组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组的退热时间、咳嗽消失时间、肺部啰音消失时间与治疗时间均优于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组的不良反应发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:中西医结合治疗急性气管-支气管炎可以提高临床疗效,减少不良反应,缩短退热时间、咳嗽消失时间、肺部啰音消失时间和治疗时间。
Objective： To explore clinical efficacy of Chinese medicine and western medicine on the treatment of acute airway-bronchitis. Methods. 102 cases of acute airway-bronchitis patients of syndrome of phlegm heat obstructing lung were taken as the study objectives and divided into the observation group（n=52） and control group （n=52） according to the random number table. In the control group patients were treated with oxygen, suction, rehydration, anti-virus and other conventional treatment. Dexamethasone was given 0.5 mg/kg, three times a day intravenously. Penicillin sodium was taken with normal saline by intravenous drip. In observation group patients was given medicine on the basis of the control group. Clinical efficacy and adverse reactions in two groups were compared. Results： The total effective rate in the control group was 70.6%. In observation group the total effective rate was 90.2%. The total effective rate in observation group was better than that of the control group（P 〈 0.05）. Cooling time, cough disappearance time, pulmonary tales disappearance time in observation group were shorter than those of the control group （P 〈0.05）. Conclusion： The combination of Chinese and Western medicine on the treatment of acute airway-bronchitis inflammation can improve clinical outcome, reduce adverse reactions and cooling time, cough and pulmonary rales disappeared time. This program showed certain effect and be clinical worthy of further exploration.
出处
《新中医》
CAS
2015年第3期56-58,共3页
New Chinese Medicine
关键词
急性气管-支气管炎
中药
咳嗽
疗效
不良反应
Acute airway-bronchitis
Medicine,, Cough
Efficacy
Adverse reactions
