期刊文献+

腰椎融合后的多模式镇痛 被引量:10

Multimodal pain control protocol after lumbar spinal fusion
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:疼痛生理病理机制包括中枢和多个外周神经传导机制和环节,治疗手段上经历了传统的镇痛药物注射、口服镇痛药物、自控硬膜外镇痛、自控静脉镇痛等方法,减轻了临床疼痛,但仍有一定的不良反应发生。多模式镇痛方案从多个机制层面达到完全镇痛的目的,具有一定的临床创新性,但临床疗效及安全性有待于进一步深入研究。目的:探讨切口周围注射复合麻醉药物的多模式镇痛方案在腰椎后路融合后的镇痛效果及安全性。方法:2013年4月至2014年4月共收治行腰椎后路融合患者78例,随机分为两组,试验组39例采用切口周围注射多模式镇痛药物(吗啡+酮咯酸+罗哌卡因+肾上腺素)治疗,对照组39例局部注射生理盐水。所有患者记录融合后即刻、6 h、12 h、24 h、48 h、7 d的目测类比评分、Ramsay镇静评分以及融合后首次吗啡使用时间、吗啡使用量及不良反应。结果与结论:两组患者间在年龄、性别、主要病因、体质量指数、手术节段方面差异无显著性意义,具有统计学可比性。在融合后6,12,24,48 h内,试验组目测类比评分明显降低(P<0.05),Ramsay镇静评分较对照组升高(P<0.05)。但在融合后第7天时两组目测类比评分差异无显著性意义。试验组融合后首次吗啡使用时间较对照组明显延迟(P=0.002),同时吗啡使用量也明显降低(P=0.041),有效控制了临床围手术期的药物使用并保证了镇痛的效果。提示对于腰椎后路融合后患者,多模式镇痛可作为一种安全有效的镇痛方案使用,可以显著降低融合后疼痛程度而不增加不良反应的发生,提高患者的满意度。 BACKGROUND: Pathophysiological mechanisms of the pain are mediated by the central and peripheral nerve conduction mechanisms, the commonly used treatment includes analgesic drugs injection, oral analgesic drugs, patient-controlled epidural analgesia, and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia. These methods can reduce clinical pain, but induce some adverse reactions. Multimodal pain control protocol contributes to achieve complete analgesic effect and has clinical innovation significance. Further research is needed to explore clinical efficacy and safety. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic effect and safety of muItimoda( pain control protocol on postoperative analgesia of lumbar spinal fusion. METHODS: Between April 2013 and April 2014, 78 patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion were chosen for this research, and randomly assigned to experimental group with 39 patients and control group with 39 patients. The experimental group was treated with local injection of morphine, ketorolac, ropivacaine and adrenalin around the incision; the control group was treated with local injection of saline. The VAS score, Ramsay score, the first morphine time, the dose of morphine and adverse reactions immediately and at 6, 12, 24, 48 hours and 7 days after fusion were recorded.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender, bone mass index, pathogeny and surgical segment. At 6, 12, 24, 48 hours after fusion, the VAS scores in the experimental group were lower (P 〈 0.05) and the Ramsay scores were higher than the control group (P 〈 0.05). The VAS scores showed no significant difference between the two groups at 7 days after fusion. The first morphine time was obviously delayed (P=0.002) and the dose of morphine was reduced in the experimental group (P=0.041), which effective controlled perioperative drug use and ensured anesthesia effect. Multimodal pain control protocol is safe and effective Jn treatment of postoperative pain after tumbar spinal fusion, it significantly reduces the pains after fusion and improves patients' satisfaction without further adverse reaction.
出处 《中国组织工程研究》 CAS CSCD 2014年第53期8656-8660,共5页 Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
关键词 脊柱融合术 镇痛 疼痛测定 麻醉 植入物 脊柱植入物 腰椎融合术 后路 多模式镇痛 临床 lumbar spinal fusion analgesia pain measurement anesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Negrini S. Approach to scoliosis changed due to causes other than evidence: patients call for conservative (rehabilitation) experts to join in team orthopedic surgeons. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(10): 731-741.
  • 2Lowry K J, Tobias J, Kirtle D, et al. Postoperative pain control using epidural catheters after anterior spinal fusion for adolescent scoliosis. Spine. 2001 ;28(11): 1290-1293.
  • 3Cohen BE, Hartman MB, Wade JT, et al. Postoperative pain control after lumbar spine fusion: patient-controlled analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia. Spine. 1997;22(16): 1892-1896.
  • 4Grant RP, Dolman JF, Harper JA, et al. Patient-controlled lumbar epidural fentanyl compared with patient -controlled intravenous fentanyl for post -thoracotomy pain. Can J Anaesth.1992;39(3): 214-219.
  • 5Kehlet H,Dahl JB. The value of' multimodal" or" balanced analgesia" in postoperative pain treatment. Anesth Analg. 1993;77(5): 1048-1056.
  • 6Souter AJ,Fredman B,White PF. Controversies in the pedoperative use of nonsterodial anfiJnflammatory drugs. Anesth Analg. 1994;79(6):1178-1190.
  • 7Gottschalk A, Freitag M, Tank S, et al. Quality of postoperative pain using an intraoperatively placed epidural catheter after major lumbar spinal surgery. Anesthesiology. 2004; 101 (1): 175-180.
  • 8Block BM, Liu SS, Rowlingson A J, et al. Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2003;290(18):2455-2463.
  • 9梁林,姜为民.硬膜外镇痛和静脉镇痛对脊柱融合术后镇痛效果比较的Meta分析[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2014,24(5):433-439. 被引量:10
  • 10Dolin S J, Cashman JN, Bland JM. Effectiveness of acute postoperative pain management: I. Evidence from published data. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89(3):409-423.

二级参考文献57

  • 1鞠洪斌,余存泰,覃健,侯之启.全膝关节置换术中关节周围局部注药镇痛效果的研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(13):967-968. 被引量:23
  • 2Fischer HBJ, Simanski CJP. A procedure - specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for analgesia after total hip - replacement[ J]. Anaesthesia,2005,60 : 1189 - 1202.
  • 3Pascal, Vendittoli, et al. A muhimodal analgesia protocol for total knee arthroplasty[ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2006,88:282 - 289.
  • 4Toftdahl K. Comparison of peri - and intraarticular analgesia with femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty. A randomized clinical trial [ J]. Acta Orthop,2007,2 : 172 - 179.
  • 5Busch CA. Efficacy of periarticular multinndal drug injection in total knee arthroplasly. A randomized trial [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006,5:959 - 963.
  • 6Dennis RK, Lawrence K. Local infihration analgesia : a technique for the control of acute postoperative pain following knee and hip surgery. A case study of 325 patients [ J ]. Acta Orthopaediea,2008,2 : 174 - 183.
  • 7McArdle P. Intravenous analgesia. Crit Care Clin, 1999,15:89-104.
  • 8Bowdle TA. Adverse effects of opioid agonists and agonist-antagonists in anesthesia. Drug Saf, 1998,19:173-189.
  • 9Kehlet H, Dahl JB. The value of "multimodal" or "balanced analgesia"in postoperative pain treatment. Anesth Analg, 1993,77:1048-1056.
  • 10Power I, Barrett S. Analgesic agents for the postoperative period: nonopioids. Surg Clin North Am, 1999,79:275-295.

共引文献411

同被引文献78

  • 1张昊华,张洪,周一新,林惠华.全膝关节置换术围手术期多模式镇痛方案的临床研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2008,28(8). 被引量:37
  • 2郝永强,干耀恺,朱振安.塞来昔布对骨科围手术期镇痛的疗效评估[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(2):131-133. 被引量:28
  • 3胡杰,李军,黄志莲,连庆泉.舒芬太尼静脉与硬膜外自控镇痛在骨科下肢手术术后镇痛中的应用比较[J].实用医学杂志,2007,23(6):901-902. 被引量:20
  • 4胡艳君,魏安宁,刘怀清.超前镇痛对手术后疼痛影响的研究进展[J].重庆医学,2007,36(4):362-365. 被引量:86
  • 5裴国献,李旭,夏志敏.创伤骨科手术学[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社.2013:14-15.
  • 6YAMAZAKI K, YOSHIDA S, ITO T, et al. Postoperative outcome of lumbar spinal canal stenosis after fenestration: correlation with changes in intradural and ertradural tube on magnetic resonance imging [J].J Orthop Surg,2002,10(2) : 136-143.
  • 7DEVIN C J, MCGIRT MJ. Best evidence in multimodalpain management in spine surgery and means of assessing postoperative pain and functional outcomes [J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2015,22(6) :930-938.
  • 8BURKE SM, SHORTEN GD. Perioperative pregabalin improves painandfunctional outcomes 3 months after lumbar discectomy [J].Anesth Analg,2010,110(4) : 1180-1185.
  • 9DOLGUN H, TURKOGLU E, KERTMEN It, et al. Gabapentin versus pregabalin in relieving early post-surgical neuropathic pain in patients after lumbar disc herniation surgery:a prospective clinical trial[J]. Nenrol Res, 2014,36 (12) : 1080- 1085.
  • 10VINYCOMB TI, SAHHAR LJ. Comparison of local anesthetics for digitalnerve blocks asystematic review [J]. J Hand Surg Am 2014,39(4) : 744-751.

引证文献10

二级引证文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部