TALIS：一种教师专业发展水平的测量框架--基于2013年国际性教与学的大数据调查被引量：4

TALIS: A Measurement Framework about Level of Teachers' Professional Development——Based on 2013 International Teaching and Learning Data Survey

下载PDF

导出

摘要 2008年,OECD研发了一种测量教师的教与学状况和专业发展的项目——"教与学的国际调查",并于2008年开展了首次国际性针对教与学状况的调查;2013年,OECD开展了第二次针对教师教与学状况的跨国性调查。本文通过分析该项目的实施过程、测评指标和分析框架,透视其设计理念,希望形成一个以教师与学校、教师与课堂、教师与培训为经,以内容、行为和理念为纬的教师专业发展的测量框架,希望能够促进建立科学的教师评价制度,建立科学的测量教师专业发展水平的框架,为教师专业发展设定一个参照系数。 The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development （OECD） developed a program that is used for measuring the status of teachers＇ teaching and learning and professional development in 2007 The International Teaching and Learning Survey, and implemented the first international survey on status of teaching and learning in 2008; OECD launched the second cross-countries investigation about the status of teachers＇ teaching and learning. Hope to analyze the implement process, measurement norm and analysis framework based on this investigation, while understand their design idea. In addition, develop a measurement framework about level of teachers＇ professional development in the way teachers and schools, teachers and classroom, teachers and training as meridian; content, behavior and as parallel in order to establish scientific evaluation system of teachers, a framework for scientific measurements of teachers＇ professional development level and sets a frame of reference for teache.rs＇ professional development.

作者殷玉新

机构地区华东师范大学课程与教学研究所

出处《外国中小学教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期11-17,共7页 Primary & Secondary Schooling Abroad

关键词 TALIS 教师专业发展测量框架 TALIS teachers＇ professional development measurement framework

分类号 G451 [文化科学—教育技术学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献10

1田守春,郭元婕.OECD“教师教学国际调查项目”(TALIS)评析及启示[J].外国教育研究,2009,36(11):61-64. 被引量：5
2高光,张民选.经济合作与发展组织的三大国际教育测试研究[J].比较教育研究,2011,33(10):28-33. 被引量：16
3http://www, keepeek, corn/ Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/education/ talis-2013-results9789264196261-en#page28,89,124,153,187,185.
4Barber, M. and M. Mourshed. How the Best- performing Schools Come Out on Top [M]. Mckinsey and Company. 2007.
5Seidel,T. and R.J. Shavelson. Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis researchEJ]. Review of Education Research, 2007(77):454.
6Murawski,W.W. and H.L. Swanson. A meta- analysis of co-teaching research[J].Remedial and Special Education, 2011(22):258.
7Capara, G.V. et al. Efficacy belief as determinants of teachers' job satisfaction[J]. Journal of Education Psychology. 2006,44(6):473.
8Klassen and Chiu. Effect on teachers' self- efficacy and job satisfaction: Teachers' gender, years of experience and job stress[J]. Journal of Education Psychology. 2010, 102(3):741.
9Crossman, A and P. Harris. Job satisfaction of secondary school teachers[J]. Education Management Administration and Leadership. 2006, (34):29.
10胡惠闵.如何在教研组活动中运用教师反思机制[J].全球教育展望,2003,32(8):60-62. 被引量：9

二级参考文献8

1郭元婕,鲍传友.实现教师专业自主发展的路径探讨[J].中国教育学刊,2006(12):61-63. 被引量：33
2陈桂生主编.《到中小学生研究教育》[M].华东师范大学出版社,2000年版.第32页.
3OECD , Education ,at a Glance 2008--OECD Indicators. Paris :OECD,2008.
4OECD.Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments:First Results from TALIS.Paris:OECD,2009.20.21.303.20.48.88.138.190.
5OECD.AHELO Brochure [EB/OL].http://www.oecd. o rg/ dataoecd/3 7 / 4 9 / 4 5 7 5 5 8 7 5.pdf.
6OECD.PIAAC Brochure [EB/OL].http://www. oecd.org/dataoeed/13/45/41690983.pdf.
7迪波拉·亨德森（Deborah Henderson）,汪侃（翻译）.教育领导力理论能够影响校长的工作么?[J].江苏教育研究（职教）（C版）,2009(2):9-13. 被引量：2
8田兴华.教师职业倦怠及干预研究[J].教育理论与实践（学科版）,2007,27(S2):31-32. 被引量：6