期刊文献+

医院社区联合式干预在糖尿病前期人群中的应用效果 被引量:8

Application of joint hospital and community intervention in the population with impaired glucose regulation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨医院社区联合式干预在糖尿病前期人群中的应用效果。方法采用抽签法将选定的4个社区随机整群分为两个对照组社区和两个研究组社区,首先对4个社区的人群进行糖尿病筛查,然后对筛查出的糖尿病前期人群进行干预。共确定121人,研究组57人,对照组64人。对照组给予每3个月一次的社区医护人员随访,研究组给予医院社区联合式干预,包括每3个月一次的社区医护人员随访、医院医护人员健康讲座、现场咨询与个体化的饮食和运动处方,时间均为12个月。干预前后收集两组血糖、体质量指数等临床指标的变化。结果研究组失访1人,共120人完成研究。干预前两组空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖、糖化血红蛋白、体质量指数比较差异无统计学意义( P>0.05);干预后研究组以上指标分别为(5.70±0.66)mmol/L,(7.29±1.85)mmol/L,(6.26±0.45)%,(26.00±3.11)kg/m2,对照组分别为(6.21±0.99)mmol/L,(8.18±2.26)mmol/L,(6.55±0.74)%,(27.20±3.13)kg/m2,差异有统计学意义( t值分别为3.148,2.271,2.379,2.070;P<0.05)。两组健康信念问卷得分干预前比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05),干预后研究组健康信念得分为(127.63±11.64),高于对照组的(121.76±12.53)分,差异有统计学意义(t=2.944,P<0.05)。干预1年后,研究组有53.57%糖代谢恢复正常,对照组31.25%恢复正常,差异有统计学意义( Z=2.560,P<0.05)。结论医院社区联合式干预可以改善糖尿病前期人群异常的糖代谢状态,降低糖尿病的发病率。 Objective To investigate the application effect of joint hospital and community intervention in the population with impaired glucose regulation ( IGR) .Methods Four selected communities were divided into the control group and the experimental group.All samples were screened for diabetes mellitus and then given different interventions.Totals of 121 samples were included.There were 57 cases in the experimental group, and 64 cases in the control group.The control group was given a three-month follow-up by the community health workers, while the experimental group was given a joint community and hospital worker’ intervention, including a three-month follow-up of the community, the first three months of hospital health lectures, on-site consultation, individualized diet and exercise prescription.The intervention time was 12 months.Before and after the intervention, samples were asked to complete an IGR health belief questionnaire and other clinical indicators of changes in blood glucose and body mass index were collected.Results One case in the experimental group was lost during follow-up, and 120 cases finished the research.The fasting blood glucose, postprandial 2 h blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, body mass index were not statistically different between two groups before the intervention (P〉0.05).After the intervention, fasting blood glucose, postprandial 2 hour plasma glucose, glycated hemoglobin, body weight index of the experimental group were ( 5.70 ± 0.66)mmol/L, (7.29 ±1.85) mmol/L, (6.26 ±0.45)% and (26.00 ±3.11)kg/m2, respectively.Those values of the control group were (6.21 ±0.99) mmol/L, (8.18 ±2.26) mmol/L, (6.55 ±0.74)% and (27.20 ±3.13)kg/m2.There were significant differences between the two groups (t=3.148, 2.271, 2.379, 2.070, respectively;P〈0.05).The score of health belief was not statistically different between the two groups before the intervention (P〉0.05).After the intervention, the score of health belief of the experimental group was (127.63 ±11.64), which was significantly higher than (121.76 ±12.53) of the control group (t=2.944, P〈0.05 ) .One year after the intervention, 53.57% cases in the experimental group returned to normal glycometabolism, and 31.25%cases in the control group returned to normal, and the difference was significant ( Z=2.560, P 〈0.05 ) .Conclusions Joint hospital and community intervention can improve the state of abnormal glucose metabolism, and reduce the incidence of diabetes in population with IGR.
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2014年第33期4178-4182,共5页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词 糖尿病前期 医院 社区 健康教育 联合式干预 Early stage of diabetes mellitus Hospital,community Health education Joint hospital and community intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献26

  • 1韩明英,李守周.2型糖尿病预防干预130例效果观察[J].现代医药卫生,2005,21(7):786-786. 被引量:3
  • 2潘孝仁,李光伟,胡英华,王继兴,杨文英,安作新,刘娟,曹辉碧,胡泽溪,庞成言,张辉,郑辉,王金平,姜希贵,姜亚云.饮食和运动干预治疗对糖尿病发病率的影响──530例糖耐量低减人群六年前瞻性观察[J].中华内科杂志,1995,34(2):108-112. 被引量:243
  • 3王相立,麻爱华,杨希文.农村首发精神分裂症患者亲属健康教育的10年随访研究[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2005,31(5):369-371. 被引量:35
  • 4江艳军,黄行芝,杨春,高玉,简周红,许玲莉,李巧云,江平.生活方式干预对荆门地区糖耐量减退患者的应用效果评价[J].中国实用护理杂志(中旬版),2007,23(7):14-15. 被引量:4
  • 5Unwin N,Shaw J,Zimmet P. Impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glycaemia:the current states on definition and intervention[J]. Diabet Med,2002,19(9) :708-723.
  • 6Diabetes mellitus:report of a WHO study group [R]. WHO Tech Rep Ser, 1985,727:7-113.
  • 7World Health Organization(1999) Definition,Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus and its Complications. Report of a WHO Consultation[R]. Part 1: Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Menitus. Geneva ,World Health Organization.
  • 8Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus[R]. Diabetes Care,1997,20:1183-1197.
  • 9Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E ,Fowler SE,et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or mefformin[J]. N Engl J Med,2002,346(6):393403.
  • 10Eindstrom J,Eriksson JG,Valle TF,et al. Prevention of diabetes mellitus in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance in the finnish diabetes prevention study:results from a randomized clinical trial [J]. J Am Soc Nephrol,2003,14(7 suppl 2) :S108-S113.

共引文献6883

同被引文献101

  • 1周小洁.应用综合健康管理模式控制糖尿病前期人群发病率的效果观察[J].当代医药论丛,2014,12(1):217-217. 被引量:4
  • 2杨喜忠,孙静,杨林,李晓苗,赵长海.中医食疗药膳治疗Ⅱ型糖尿病38例疗效观察[J].浙江中医药大学学报,2007,31(5):596-597. 被引量:25
  • 3Xu Y, Wang L, He J, et al. Prevalence and control of diabetes in Chi- nese adults[J]. JAMA,2013,310(9) :948 -959.
  • 4Safren SA, Gonzalez JS, Wexler DJ, et al. A randomized controlled tri- al of cognitive behavioral therapy for adherence and depression( CBT - AD) in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes [ ./]. Diabetes Care,2013,28 ( 1 ) : 1 - 10.
  • 5French DP, Wade AN, Farmer A.I. Predicting self - care behaviours of patients with type 2 diabetes : the importance of beliefs about behav- ior, not just beliefs about illness [ J ]. J Psychosom Res,2013,74 (4) : 327 - 333.
  • 6Johnson JA, A1 Sayah F, Wozniak L, et al. Controlled trial of a collab- orative primary care team model for patients with diabetes and depres- sion:rational and design for a comprehensive evaluation [ J ]. BMC Health Serv Res,2012(12) :258.
  • 7Lloyd CE,Pambianco G, Orchard TJ, et al. Does diabetes - related distress explain the presence of depressive symptoms and/or poor self- care in individuals with Type 1 diabetes? [ J ]. Diabet Med, 2010,27 (2) ,234 - 237.
  • 8Goldney RD, Phillips PJ, Fisher LJ, et al. Diabetes, depression, and quality of life : a population study [ J ]. Diabetes Care,2004,27 ( 5 ), 1066 - 1070.
  • 9van der Feltz - Comelis CM, Nuyen J, Stoop C, et al. Effect of inter- ventions for major depressive disorder and significant depressive symptoms in patients with diabetes mellitus:a systematic review and meta - analysis [ J ]. Gen Hosp Psychiatry,2010,32 (4) :380 - 395.
  • 10Welschen LM, van Oppen P, Bot SD, et al. Effects of a cognitive be- havioural treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes when added to managed care; a randomised controlled trial [ J]. J Behav Med, 2013,36(6) :556 -566.

引证文献8

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部