期刊文献+

传统手术和微创手术治疗小儿疝气疗效对比研究 被引量:6

A Comparative Study of Traditional Operation and Minimally Invasive Operation in Treatment of Children Colic Efficacy
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨微创手术和传统手术治疗小儿疝气临床效果。方法对来我院诊治的90例患儿入院资料进行分析,将其随机分为两组。对照组采用传统手术治疗,实验组采用微创手术治疗,比较两组治疗效果。结果实验组93.3%治疗效果理想,高于对照组(80%)(P<0.05);实验组93.3%对我院治疗总体满意,高于对照组(P<0.05)。实验组手术时间为(11.37±2.63)min、术中出血量为(4.62±0.39)ml,术后并发症为17.8%(8/45),低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论小儿疝气发病率较高,采用微创手术治疗效果理想,值得推广使用。 Objective To explore the minimally invasive operation and traditionaloperation in treatment of the clinical effect of pediatric hernia. Methods 90 cases of patients admitted to our hospital were analyzed,and were randomly divided into two groups. The control group used the traditionaloperation treatment,the experimental group with minimally invasive operationtreatment,treatment effects were compared between the two groups. Results The ideal effect in treatment of experimental group was 93.3%,higher than that of the control group (80%)(P〈0.05); the experimental group of 93.3% in our hospital for the overall satisfaction,higher than that of the control group (P〈0.05). The experimental group operation time was (11.37±2.63) min,the amount of intraoperative bleeding was (4.62 ± 0.39) ml,postoperative complications was 17.8% (8/45),lower than that of the control group(P〈0.05). Conclusion The high incidence of pediatric hernia, ideal treatment effect of minimal y invasive operation in clinical use,is worthy to be popularized.
作者 李志刚
出处 《中国卫生标准管理》 2014年第23期127-128,共2页 China Health Standard Management
关键词 微创手术 传统手术 小儿疝气 临床效果 Minimally invasive operation,Traditional operation,Children colic,Clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1李兰芝,张宝良,杨飞,张家兴,郭世盛.经腹腔镜疝囊高位缝扎治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝(附22例报告)[J].中华外科杂志,1994,32(12):727-728. 被引量:70
  • 2黄建明,冯旭,李承,姜新华,瞿卫,顾龙殿,周建华,卫绍斌,朱雅龙,何家文,李泽湘,杨志武.后路椎间盘镜微创治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床分析[J].中华显微外科杂志,2006,29(6):455-457. 被引量:18
  • 3Yasargil MG. Microsurgical operation of herniated lumbar disc. Adv Neurosurg, 1977, 4: 81-82.
  • 4Caspar W. A new surgical procedure for lumbar disc herniation causing less tissue damage through a microsurgical approach. Adv Neurosurg, 1977, 4: 74-80.
  • 5Maroon J. Current concepts in minimally invasive discectomy. Neurosurgery, 2002, 51(5 Suppl): S137-145.
  • 6Koebbe CJ, Maroon JC, Abla A, et al. Lumbar microdiscectomy: a historical perspective and current technical considerations. Neurosurg Focus, 2002, 13(2): E3.
  • 7Yone K, Sakou T, Kawauchi Y, et al. Indications of fusion for lumber spinal stenosis in elderly patients and its significance. Spine, 1996, 21 (2): 242-248.
  • 8Nowitzke AM. Assessment of the learning curve for Lumbar microendoscopic discectomy. Neurosurgery, 2005, 56(4): 755-762.
  • 9Palmer S. Use of a tubular retractor system in microscopic lumbar discectomy: 1 year prospective results in 135 patients. Neurosurg Focus, 2002, 13(2): E5.
  • 10胡有谷.腰椎间盘突出症.2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1995.

共引文献57

同被引文献22

引证文献6

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部