期刊文献+

基于犹豫模糊COPRAS的多属性群决策评价方法 被引量:1

Multi-attribute Group Decision-making Method of Evaluation Based on Hesitant Fuzzy COPRAS
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对现实中不确定性条件下的多属性群决策问题,文章提出基于犹豫模糊COPRAS的多属性群决策评价方法。考虑到专家在多个语义术语间犹豫不定的问题,采用犹豫模糊术语集表达评价信息。利用min-upper和max-lower算子以及二元语义计算方法处理信息评价。以整体满意度最大化为目标函数建立线性规划模型来求解属性的权重,利用COPRAS方法计算方案的效用度,为不确定性语言下的方案选择提供了科学的依据。最后以某大型国企空调选购问题为例,证明了该方法的有效性。 In order to solve the problem of multi-attribute group decision-making under uncertain conditions, this paper proposes a multi-attribute group decision-making method based on hesitant fuzzy COPRAS. Considering the hesitation of experts between multiple semantic terms, this paper adopts the hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set to express the evaluation information, and uses the mini-upper operator, max-lower operator and the binary semantic calculation method to handle the information evaluation. Then the paper takes maximization of overall satisfaction as the objective to establish a linear programming model for solution of the attribute weight, and uses COPRAS method to calculate the utility degree of the scheme, which provides a scientific basis for the scheme selection under the uncertainty language. Finally, the paper takes the purchase of air conditioners in a large state-owned enterprise as an example to demonstrate the validity of the proposed method.
作者 王乾 耿秀丽 Wang Qian;Geng Xiuli(School of Management,University of Shanghai for Science and Technology,Shanghai 200093,China)
出处 《统计与决策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第3期45-49,共5页 Statistics & Decision
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71301104) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助课题(20133120120002) 上海市高原学科资助项目(GYXK1201)
关键词 多属性群决策 COPRAS 犹豫模糊术语集 线性规划 multi-attribute group decision-making COPRAS hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set linear programming
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1姜青舫.证券投资的风险偏好与期望效用决策模型[J].审计与经济研究,2006,21(5):77-81. 被引量:12
  • 2王美乂,张凤鸣,刘智.模糊信息的熵权多属性决策方案评估方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2006,28(10):1523-1525. 被引量:37
  • 3陈孝新.对属性有偏好的多属性决策方法[J].统计与决策,2007,23(7):36-37. 被引量:7
  • 4冯向前,魏翠萍,李宗植.基于理想关联度的不确定多属性决策方法[J].运筹与管理,2007,16(2):24-28. 被引量:17
  • 5Xu Z S, Dai Q L. Prejection Method for Uncertain Multi-Attribute Decision Making With Preference Information on Ahernatives[J].Inter- national Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 2004, 3(3).
  • 6Xu Z S. Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making With Different Formats of Preference Information On Attributes[J].IEEE Transac- tions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B, 2007,37 (6).
  • 7Lee K S, Park K S, Eum Y S, et al. Extended Methods for Identifying Dominance and Potential Optimality in Muhi-Criteria Analysis With Imprecise Information[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001,134(3).
  • 8Kim S H, Han C H. An Interactive Procedure for Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making Procedure With Incomplete Information[J]. Computers & Operational Research, 1999,26(8).
  • 9Farquhar P H. State of The Art-Utility Assessment Methods[J].Man- agement Science, 1984,30( 11 ).
  • 10Goh C H, Tung Y C, Cheng C H. A Revised Weighted Sum Deci- sion Model for Robot Selection[J]. Computers & Industrial Engi- neering, 1996,30(2).

共引文献15

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部