期刊文献+

肠道病毒71型手足口病病毒3种检测技术比较研究 被引量:2

Comparative study of three techniques for the detection of EV71 virus
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同方法在肠道病毒71型(EV71)检测中的效果对比分析,方便对EV71做出及时而有效的诊断,为该病快速鉴别诊断奠定基础。方法采用ELISA、荧光定量RT-PCR、RT-PCR 3种方法对EV71病毒特异性和灵敏度进行综合分析。结果通过对比分析,ELISA方法检出阳性18份,阳性率为11.32%;实时荧光定量PCR方法检出阳性53份,阳性率为33.33%;RT-PCR方法检出阳性51份,阳性率为32.08%。结论 3种方法中实时荧光定量PCR方法具有较高的灵敏度及特异性,更具优势,更能满足临床需要。 Objective To explore the different ways in enterovirus 71 (EV71) detection results compared,lay the foundation of quick diagnosis on the disease. Methods The three methods for ELISA, fluorescence quantitative RT - PCR and RT- PCR were used and compared for specificity and sensitivity of EV71. Results Through comparative analysis, eight- een samples were detected positive by ELISA methods, the positive rate was 11.32%. Fifty - three samples were tested positive by the fluorescence method for real - time RT - PCR , the positive rate was 33.33%. Fifty - one samples were detected positive by RT - PCR, the positive rate was 32.8%. Conclusion Fluorescent RT - PCR detection method has the performance of high sensitivity and specificity in the three methods, it can meet with the clinical needs better.
出处 《中国卫生工程学》 CAS 2014年第3期232-234,共3页 Chinese Journal of Public Health Engineering
关键词 肠道病毒EV71 ELISA 实时荧光定量RT—PCR RT—PCR Enterovirus 71 ELISA Fluorescence quantitative RT - PCR RT - PCR
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献83

共引文献36

同被引文献29

  • 1Penny F Whiting,Marie E Weswood,Anne WS Rutjes,Johannes B Reitsma,Patrick NM Bossuyt,Jos Kleijnen,马章淳,钱楠.QUADAS评价:一种用于诊断性研究的质量评价工具(修订版)[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(7):531-536. 被引量:65
  • 2Ho M.Enterovirus 71:the virus,its infections and outbreaks[J].Microbiol Immunol Infect,2000,33(4):205-216.
  • 3Wang SY, Lin TL,Chen HY,et al.Early and rapid detection of enterovirus 71 infection by an IgM-capture ELISA[J].J Virol Methods.2004,119(1):37-43.
  • 4Wang Y,Feng Z,Yang Y,et al.Hand,foot,and mouth disease in China:patterns of spread and transmi.ssibility[J].Epidemiology,2011,22(6):781-792.
  • 5Xu FtYan Q,Wang H,et al.Performance of detecting IgM anti- bodies against enterovirus 71 for early diagnosis[J].PLoS One,2010,5(6):11388.
  • 6Tsao KC,Chan EC, Chang LY,et al.Responses of IgM for en- terovirus 71 infection[J].J Med Virol,2002,68(4):574-580.
  • 7Lin Y,Wen K,Pan Y,et al.Cross-reactivity of anti-EV71 IgM and neutralizing antibody in series sera of patients infected with Enterovirus 71 and Coxsackievirus A 16[J].J Immunoass Immu- noch,2011,32(3):233-243.
  • 8Mitchell MD.Validation of the summary ROC for diagnostic lest meta-analysis:a monte carlo simulation[J].Academic radiology,2003,10(1):25-31.
  • 9谢靖婧,杨桂林,刘映霞,刘威龙,陈心春,朱秀云,徐六妹,周亚红,王火生,周伯平.肠道病毒71型手足口病ELISA诊断试剂盒研制与临床应用[J].中华检验医学杂志,2009,32(11):1262-1265. 被引量:16
  • 10李金明,熊德琴,齐晓彤,斯志娟.实时荧光定量PCR在手足口病病原体检测中的应用[J].实验与检验医学,2011,29(2):129-130. 被引量:16

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部