期刊文献+

网状Meta分析的撰写与报告 被引量:65

Writing and Reporting of Network Meta-analysis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 网状Meta分析是传统Meta分析的扩展,可以实现同时对三个或者三个以上的干预措施的疗效进行比较。本文介绍了网状Meta分析的定义、基本假设、统计分析及软件、撰写和报告,以期吸引更多研究者关注,进而促进网状Meta分析方法的发展。 Network Meta-analysis(NMA) is an extension of the traditional Meta-analysis, and it is used to assess the clinical effec- tiveness of three or more than three interventions. This study aims to summarize the definition, basic assumptions, statistical analysis and software, writing and reporting on using NMA, in order to attract more attention of researchers and promote the methodological develop- ment of NMA.
出处 《中国药物评价》 2013年第6期321-323,333,共4页 Chinese Journal of Drug Evaluation
基金 2011年兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金:lzjbky 2011-133
关键词 网状Meta分析 撰写 报告 Network Meta-analysis Writing Reporting
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Bucher HC, Guyatt GH, Griffith LE, et al. The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [ J ]. J Clin Epidemiol, 1997,50:683-691.
  • 2Lumley T. Network Meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons [ J ]. StatMed,2002,21(16) :2313-2324.
  • 3Song F, Loke YK, Walsh T,et al. Methodological problems in the use of indi- rect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions : a survey of published systematic reviews[ J]. BMJ,2009,338 :b1147.
  • 4Lu G, Ades AE. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treat- ment comparisons[ J ]. Stat Med, 2004,23:3105-3124.
  • 5Jansen JP, Crawford B, Bergman G, et al. Bayesian Meta-analysis of multiple treatment comparisons : an introduction to mixed treatment comparisons [ J ]. Value Health ,2008,11 (5) :956-964.
  • 6Song F, Xiong T, Parekh-Bburke S, et al. Inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of competing interventions: Meta-epidemiological study [J]. BMJ, 2011,343: d4909.
  • 7Jansen JP, Fleurence R, Devine B, et al. Interpreting indirect treatment com- parisons and network Meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices : part 1 [ J]. Value Health,2011,14(4) :417-428.

同被引文献1266

引证文献65

二级引证文献464

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部