期刊文献+

血液透析中血压变异性及影响因素的初步探讨 被引量:25

Preliminary study on the intradialytic blood pressure variability and influencing factors
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解终末期肾病(ESRD)患者血液透析过程中血压变异性(BPV)特点,分析BPV的影响因素。方法入选规律血液透析且临床判断干体质量达标的患者81例,应用动态血压监测仪行围透析期血压监测。BPV用收缩压变异系数(SBP.CV)和标准差(SBP.SD)表示。根据SBP.CV均值将患者分成高收缩压变异性(SBPV)组和低SBPV组,对可能的影响因素年龄、透析龄、脱水量、失重比、降压治疗、电解质、营养水平、矿物质骨代谢指标、炎性标志物、血脂等进行分析,比较组间差异;并分别对上述观察指标与SBP—CV、SBP—SD行多因素多元逐步回归分析。结果81例患者围透析期SBP.CV均值为(8.12±3.16)%,SBP—SD均值为(11.22±4.55)mmHg。高SBPV(SBP—CV≥8.12%)组发生透析中高血压和低血压的比例(20.0%和25.7%)均高于低SBPV(SBP—CV〈8.12%)组(8.7%和6.5%)(P=0.009)。高SBPV组透前高敏C反应蛋白(hs—CRP)和碱性磷酸酶(ALP)高于低SBPV组,差异有统计学意义f(7.19±5.95)mg/L比(3.35±2.78)mg/L,P=0.001;(180.31±96.32)U/L比(98.00±41.19)U/L,P=0.049]。低SBPV组透前血肌酐、血钾高于高SBPV组,差异亦有统计学意义【(1015.83±276.20)μmol/L比(893.63±216.61)μmol/L,P=0.034;(5.27±0.78)mmol/L比(4.80±0.23)mmol/L,P=0.005】。多因素多元逐步回归分析发现血液透析过程中SBP—SD与Hs—CRP呈正相关(β=0.499,P〈0.01),SBP—CV与Hs—CRP、透析龄呈正相关(β=0.464和0.211,P〈0.01和P〈0.05)。结论ESRD患者在血液透析过程中SBPV为8.12%,SBPV高的患者更容易发生透析中高瓶压和低血压,SBPV与血清hs-CRP水平密切相关。 Objective To understand the blood pressure variability (BPV) and the influencing factors through ambulatory blood pressure monitoring during hemodialysis (HD) in the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Method Eighty-one ESRD patients on maintenancing HD for more than three months were enrolled into the study. The patients were with properly dry body weight. The blood pressure was monitored using dynamic blood pressure monitor around the HD. BPV was estimated with the coefficient of variation (CV) and standard deviation (SD) of the systolic blood pressure (SBP-CV, SBP-SD). Patients were divided into two groups according to the mean of SBP-CV: high SBPV group and low SBPV group. The possible influencing factors such as age, dialysis duration, uhrafihration volume, uhrafihration/body weight, therapy of antihypertensive, electrolyte, nutrition state, metabolic bone disease indexes, inflammatory state and serum lipid state were analyzed and compared between the two groups. And multivariate stepwise regression analysis was made between the SBP-CV, SBP-SD and the above observational parameters. Results The average SBP-CV of the 81 patients was (8.12±3.16)%, SBP-SD was (11.22±4.55) mm Hg. The proportion of hypertention and hypotention in high SBPV(SBP-CV≥8.12%) group (20.0%, 25.7%) was higher than that in the low SBPV(SBP-CV 〈 8.12%) group (8.7%, 6.5%)(P = 0.009). Serum high- sensitivity c- reactive protein (hs- CRP) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were higher in high SBPV group than that in the low SBPV group[(7.19± 5.95) mg/L vs (3.35±2.78) mg/L, P = 0.001 and (180.31±96.32) U/L vs (98.00±41.19) U/L, P = 0.049]. Serum ereatinine and potassium were higher in the low SBPV group than that in the high SBPV group [(1015.83±276.20) μmol/L vs (893.63±216.61) μmol/L, P= 0.034 and (5.27±0.78) mmol/L vs (4.80± 0.23) mmol/L, P = 0.005]. SBP-SD was positively correlated with hs-CRP (β=0.499, P 〈 0.01), SBP-CV was positively correlated with hs- CRP and dialysis vintage (β = 0.464 and 0.211, P 〈 0.01 and P 〈 0.05) by the multivariate stepwise regression analysis. Conclusions The SBP- CV during HD is 8.12% in ESRD patients. Hypertention and hypotention are more often in the higher SBPV patients. SBPV is closely related to the serum hs-CRP.
出处 《中华肾脏病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第12期888-892,共5页 Chinese Journal of Nephrology
关键词 血液透析 血压 终末期肾病 血压变异性 Hemodialysis blood pressure End- stage renal disease Blood pressure variability
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Collins AJ,Foley RN,Chavers B. United States Renal Data System 2011 Annual Data Report:Atlas of chronic kidney disease & end-stage renal disease in the United States[J].{H}American Journal of Kidney Disease,2012,(1 Suppl 1):A7,e1-e420.
  • 2Remppis A,Ritz E. Cardiac problems in the dialysis patient:beyond coronary disease[J].{H}Seminars in Dialysis,2008.319-325.
  • 3Flythe JE,Kunaparaju S,Dinesh K. Factors associated with intradialytic systolic blood pressure variability[J].{H}American Journal of Kidney Disease,2012.409-418.
  • 4Dinesh K,Kunaparaju S,Cape K. A model of systolic blood pressure during the course of dialysis and clinical factors associated with various blood pressure behaviors[J].{H}American Journal of Kidney Disease,2011.794-803.
  • 5苏定冯.血压变异性与高血压的治疗[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(9):863-865. 被引量:109
  • 6Di Iorio B,Pota A,Sirico ML. Blood pressure variability and outcome-s in chronic kidney disease[J].{H}Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation,2012.4404-4410.
  • 7Rossignol P,Cridlig J,Lehert P. Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability is a strong predictor of cardiovascular events inhemodialysis:insights from FOSIDIAL[J].{H}HYPERTENSION,2012.339-346.
  • 8Kim KI,Lee JH,Chang H J. Association between blood pressure variability and inflammatory marker in hypertensive patients[J].{H}CIRCULATION JOURNAL,2008.293-298.
  • 9Abramson JL,Lewis C,Murrah NV. Relation of C-reactive protein and tumor necrosis factor-alpha to ambulatory blood pressure variability in healthy adults[J].{H}American Journal of Cardiology,2006.649-652.
  • 10Veerabhadrappa P,Diaz KM,Feairheller DL. Enhanced blood pressure variability in a high cardiovascular risk Group of African Americans:FIT4Life Study[J].J Am Soc Hypertens,2010.187-195.

二级参考文献21

  • 1张黎明,刘建华.老年自发性高血压大鼠血压波动性与靶器官损伤[J].高血压杂志,1996,4(1):7-10. 被引量:38
  • 2Parati G, Pomidossi G, Albini F, et al. Relationship of 24-hour blood pressure mean and variability to severity of target-organ damage in hypertension. J Hypertens, 1987, 5: 93-98.
  • 3Su DF, Miao CY. Blood pressure variability and organ damage. Clin Exp Phannacol Physiol, 2001, 28: 709-715.
  • 4Miao CY, Tao X, Gong K, et al. Arterial remodeling in chronic sinoaortic-denervated rats. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 2001, 37: 6-15.
  • 5Shan ZZ, Dai SM, Su DF. Arterial baroreflex deficit induced organ damage in sinoaortic denervated rats. J Cardiovas Pharmacol, 2001,38 : 427-437.
  • 6Miao CY, Su DF. The importance of blood pressure variability in rat aortic and ventricular hypertrophy produced by sinoaortic denervation. J Hyportens, 2002, 20 : 1865-1872.
  • 7Miao CY, Yuan WJ, Su DF. Comparative study of sinoaortic denervated rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Hypertens, 2003, 16: 585-591.
  • 8Miao CY, Zhang LM, Yuan WJ, et al. Angiotensin Ⅱ and AT1 receptor in hypertrophied ventricles and aortas of sinoaorticdenervated rats. Acta Pharmacol Sin, 2003, 24 : 812-818.
  • 9Tao X, Zhang SH, Chu ZX, et al. Apoptosis is involved in the cardiac damage induced by sinoaortic denervation in rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol, 2003, 30: 362-368.
  • 10Tao X, Zhang SH, Shen FM, et aL High-level apoptosis is persistent in myocardio-cytes of sinoaortic-denervated rats. J Hypertens, 2004, 22: 557-563.

共引文献108

同被引文献167

引证文献25

二级引证文献181

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部