摘要
至少从柏拉图开始,真理与修辞似乎就成了对头,然而,这其实取决于对这里所谓的真理作何界定。本文意在论证真理与修辞间特定的关联。文章首先在古希腊背景下确定修辞之为公共事务决策中通过公共演说及论辩以说服听众甚而达成共识的文化内涵,而在认知层面上,修辞之为基于可能性而非必然性逻辑的说服艺术,呈现了出与自然科学式真理的不同品格。进而我们探究了在社会公共生活背景下非此即彼、黑白分明的命题真理的不可能性及不可欲性。最后,本文试图在与命题真理对应的层面上以"道理"为人文社会领域真理的概念表达,并比较二者的区别及优劣。
Even since Plato, rhetoric seems have been conflict to the concept of truth, However, it is actually depend on what kind of truth concerns here. This paper aims to explore and demonstrate the certain relation between truth and rhetoric as the title indicates. First of all, We locate rhetoric as a discipline in ancient Greek＇ s political tradition that everything with regard to the public issues should be decided on the comensures which achieved basically through public speech and debating. It is here the logic character of rhetorical discourse based on possibility insisted of necessity presented, this is a critical epystemoligic sense that truth of human sort differ itself to the general understanding of truth that take natural science as its model. Then we question the role that truth plays in our understanding of the world and life, believe that while true or false might be im- portant to the success of everyday practice, in social public area, such conclusion is neither possible or desirable. Finally, taking the difference of truths into consideration, we suggest that Daoli（ 道理 ）might be a candidate alternation to the truth, and the articulation around this issue will be given following it.
出处
《科学．经济．社会》
CSSCI
2013年第3期15-21,共7页
Science Economy Society
