期刊文献+

TomoTherapy HI-ART加速器剂量输出稳定性检测与评价 被引量:2

Quality Assurance Procedure for the Output Constancy of TomoTherapy HI-ART
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对TomoTherapy HI-ART加速器剂量输出的稳定性进行检测和评价。方法利用A1SL电离室、矩形固体水模体与圆柱形固体水模体,参照美国医学物理学会TG-148号报告,对TomoTherapy HI-ART加速器质控规程中静态剂量输出、动态剂量输出、射线质稳定性进行检测,并对结果进行分析。结果静态剂量输出结果偏差平均值为(-0.6±1.1)%,有89.1%的数据在±2%的允许偏差范围之内,数据分布无明显规律。动态剂量输出结果偏差平均值为(1.0±1.1)%,有87.1%的数据在±2%的允许偏差范围之内。射线质较为稳定,偏差平均值为(-0.01±1.26)%,80%的结果在±1%的偏差范围之内,96%的结果在±2%的允许偏差范围之内。结论 TomoTherapy HI-ART加速器剂量输出稳定性略低于常规加速器,剂量输出易发生波动,因此每日对其输出量进行系统检测十分重要。 Objective To test and assess the output constancy of TomoTherapy HI-ART. Methods Ac- cording to TG-148 of American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) report and by using A1SL ionization chamber, slab solid water phantom, and cheese phantom, we tested and analyzed the constancy of static output, ro- tational output, and energy of TomoTherapy HI-ART. Results The average output variation was ( - 0. 6 ± 1.1 ) % for the static condition, and 89. 1% of the collected output data were within the action level of ±2%. The aver- age variation of rotational output was ( 1.0 ± 1.1 ) % , and 87. 1% of the collected data were within ± 2%. An average energy variation was ( - 0. 01 ±1.26) %, and 80% data were within + 1% and 96% data within ± 2%, which showed good constancy and reproducibility. Conclusions The output constancy of TomoTherapy HI-ART is less stable than conventional Linac, so it is important to test static and rotational output everyday to ensure the accuracy.
出处 《协和医学杂志》 2013年第4期404-407,共4页 Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital
关键词 螺旋断层调强放疗 剂量输出 质量控制 helical tomotherapy output quality assurance
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1BalogJ, Soisson E. Helical tomotherapy quality assurance[J]. IntJ Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2008, 71: 5113-5117.
  • 2Broggi 5, Cattaneo GM, Molinelli 5, et a1. Results of a two?year quality control program for a helical tomotherapy unit[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2008, 86: 231- 24l.
  • 3徐寿平,戴相昆,解传滨,杨艳,王连元,巩汉顺,葛瑞刚.螺旋断层放疗机束流输出稳定性测量及分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2009,26(1):945-948. 被引量:7
  • 4Staton RJ, Langen KM, Kupelian P A, et a1. Dosimetric effects of rotational output variation and X-ray target degradation on helical tomotherapy plans[J] . Med Phys , 2009, 36: 2881-2888.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Maekie TR, Holmes T, Swerdloff S, et al. Tomotherapy: A new concept for the delivery of conformal radiotherapy [J]. Med Phys, 1993, 20(6): 1709-1719.
  • 2Mackie TR, Balog J, Ruchala K, et al. Tomotherapy [J]. Semin Radiat Oncol, 1999, 9(1): 108-117.
  • 3Balog J, Holmes T, Vaden R. Helical tomotherapy dynamic quality assurance [J]. Med Phys, 2006, 33:3939-3950.
  • 4Fenwick JD, Tome WA, Jaradat HA, et al. Quality assurance of a hellcal tomotherapy machine [J]. Phys Med Biol, 2004, 49:2933-2953.
  • 5Kutcher GJ, Coia L, Gillin M, et al. Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40 [J]. Med Phys, 1994, 21(4):581-618.
  • 6Almond PR, Biggs PJ, Coursey BM, et al. AAPM's TG51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron bearps[J]. Med Phys, 1999, 26(9):1847-1870.
  • 7Balog J, Mackie TR, Pearson D, et al. Benchmarking beam alignment for a clinical helical tomotherapy device [J]. Med Phys, 2003, 30(6): 1118-1127.
  • 8Stephen L, Daniel J and Chester R et al. Technical note: output and energy fluctuations of the tomotherapy Hi-Art helical tomotherapy system [J]. Med Phys, 2004, 31(7):2119-2120.
  • 9Balog J, Olivera G, and Kapatoes J. Clinical helical tomotherapy commissioning dosimetry [J]. Med Phys, 2003, 30(12):3097-3106.
  • 10Broggi S, Cattaneo GM, Molinelli S, et al. Results of a two-year quality control program for a helical tomotherapy unit [J]. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2008, 86:231-241.

共引文献6

同被引文献19

  • 1中华人民共和国卫生部.GBZ126-2011电子加速器放射治疗放射防护要求[S].北京:人民卫生出版社,2011.
  • 2Nguyen NP,Vock J,Sroka T,et al.Feasibility of image-guided radiotherapy based on tomotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced anal carcinoma[J].Anticancer Res,2011,31(12): 4393-4396.
  • 3Balog J,Soisson E.Helical tomotherapy quality assurance[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2008,71 Suppl 1: S113-117.
  • 4Giraud P,Kantor G,Yassa M,et al.Two-year clinical experience with tomotherapy: the French National cancer institute project on implementing new technology[J].Cancer Invest,2011,29(8): 557-563.
  • 5International Commission on Radiological Protection.ICRP publication 112.A report of preventing accidental exposures from new external beam radiation therapy technologies[J].New York: Elsevier,2009.
  • 6Langen KM,Papanikolaou N,Balog J,et al.QA for helical tomotherapy: report of the AAPM Task Group 148[J].Med Phys,2010,37(9): 4817-4853.
  • 7Broggi S,Cattaneo GM,Molinelli S,et al.Results of a two-year quality control program for a helical tomotherapy unit[J].Radiother Oncol,2008,86(2): 231-241.
  • 8Staton RJ,Langen KM,Kupelian PA,et al.Dosimetric effects of rotational output variation and X-ray target degradation on helical tomotherapy plans[J].Med Phys,2009,36(7): 2881-2888.
  • 9徐寿平,戴相昆,解传滨,杨艳,王连元,巩汉顺,葛瑞刚.螺旋断层放疗机束流输出稳定性测量及分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2009,26(1):945-948. 被引量:7
  • 10张金葆,卢爱国.螺旋断层放疗系统的验收与质量保证规范[J].医疗卫生装备,2010,31(11):124-126. 被引量:5

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部