期刊文献+

全自动血液分析仪Sysmex XE-2100、Beckman-Couler LH750和迈瑞BC-5800性能验证的比较 被引量:6

Comparison on the performance verification of automated hematology analyzer Sysmex XE-2100,Beckman Couler LH750 and MINDRAY BC-5800
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的为实验室内部验证全自动血液分析仪性能及选择确定实验室内部的基准仪器提供参考。方法卫生部临床检验中心发放的15支定值新鲜血用于正确度评价;3个浓度全血质控品用于日内和日间精密度评价;5个浓度梯度样本用于线性验证;根据性能验证统计数据给每个仪器评分,选择基准仪器。结果 3台仪器测定白细胞(WBC)、红细胞(RBC)、血红蛋白(Hb)、红细胞压积(HCT)和血小板(PLT)与参考定值的相关系数R值为0.953~0.998,平均红细胞体积(MCV)的R值为0.751~0.821。除XE-2100的PLT外,其他仪器和参数的线性相关斜率的95%的置信区间包括1,截距的95%的置信区间包括0。除BC-5800 PLT的日间精密度外,其他仪器和参数的日内和日间精密度都在说明书要求范围内。LH750和BC-5800的WBC和PLT的检测范围宽于XE-2100。性能验证综合扣分排序由低到高依次为LH750、BC-5800、XE-2100。结论 XE-2100、LH750和BC-5800基本满足产品规定性能水平,但综合考虑认为LH750更适合作为本实验室的基准仪器。 Objective To verify the performance of automated hematology analyzers in clinical laboratories, and provide the reference for choosing the referred analyzer of a clinical laboratory. Methods A total of 15 fresh whole blood specimens assigned values and being provided by the National Center for Clinical Laboratory were used to evaluate trueness, 3 levels of quality control materials were used to evaluate intra-day and inter-day precisions, 5 dilutions were assayed to verify linearity, and the score of each analyzer was adopted to determine the referred analyzer. Results Correalation coefficient R values of white blood cell ( WBC ) , red blood cell ( RBC ) , hemoglobin (Hb) , hematocrit (HCT) and platelet(PLT) of each analyzer were 0. 953 -0.998. However,R values of RBC mean corpuscular volume (MCV) of each analyzer were 0. 751 -0. 821. Except PLT of XE-2100, the other parameters of each analyzer showed that the 95% confidence intervals of slope included the value 1, and the 95% confidence intervals of Y-intercepts included the value 0. Except PLT inter-day precision of BC-5800, the intra-day and inter-day precisions of the other analyzers were complied with the specification of each analyzer. Analytical measuring intervals of WBC and PLT of LH750 and BC-5800 were wider than those of XE-2100. Sorted from high to low,the rates of general performance of each analyzer were LH750, BC-5800 and XE-2100 in sequence. Conclusions The performance verification of XE-2100, LH750 and BC-5800 shows roughly satisfactory results. Meanwhile, LH750 is the most qualified as the referred hematology analyzer in the clinical laboratory.
出处 《检验医学》 CAS 2013年第10期917-920,924,共5页 Laboratory Medicine
基金 "十二五"国家科技支撑计划课题(SQ2012BAJY3779)
关键词 性能验证 血液分析仪 正确度 精密度 线性 Performance verification Hematology analyzer Trueness Precision Linearity
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1International Organization for Standardization. Medical laboratories-particular requirements for quality and competence [ S]. ISO 15189,IS0,2007.
  • 2Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Valida- tion, verification, and quality assurance of automated hematology analyzers[ S]. H26-A2, CLSI,2007.
  • 3曾素根,江虹,黄玉霞,庄利芳,朱新勤,李倚,郭曼英,曾婷婷.血液分析仪新鲜全血比对方案的建立及应用[J].检验医学,2009,24(2):127-130. 被引量:13
  • 4黄建玲,梁瑞莲,周远青,梁玉全,谢健敏.新鲜全血在血液分析仪比对试验中的价值[J].检验医学,2010,25(9):731-733. 被引量:8
  • 5Rodak BF, Fritsma GA, Keonane. Hematology clinical principles and applications [ M ]. Fourth edition. USA : Elsevier Saunders,2012:41-55.
  • 6Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Evaluation of the linearity of quantitative measurement proce- dures : a statistical approach ; approved guideline [ S ]. EP6-A, CLSI,2003.

二级参考文献8

共引文献18

同被引文献55

  • 1中国合格评定国际认可委员会.医学实验室质量和能力认可准则:CNAS-CL02:2012[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2012.
  • 2中国合格评定国际认可委员会.医学实验室质量和能力认可准则在临床血液学检验领域的应用说明:CNASCL43:2012[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2012.
  • 3中华人民共和国卫生部.临床血液学检验常规项目分析质量要求:WS/T 406—2012[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2012.
  • 4RODAK B F,FRITSMA G A,DOIG K.Hematology:clinical principles and applications[M].4th ed.St.Louis:Elsevier Saunders,2012:41-55.
  • 5National Committee for Clinical Laboratory.Evaluation of the linearity of quantitative measure-ment procedures:a statistical approach:CLSI EP6-A:2003[S].Wayne,PA,USA:NCCLS,2003.
  • 6中华人民共和国卫生部.全血细胞分析参考区间:WS/T405—2012[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2012.
  • 7BRIGGS C,LONGAIR I,KUMAR P,et al.Performance evaluation of the Sysmex haematology XN modular system[J].J Clin Pathol,2012,65(11):1 024-1 030.
  • 8CLSI. EP9-A2 Method comparison and bias estimation u- sing patient samples[S]. Wayne, PA : CLSI, 2002.
  • 9魏吴,丛玉隆.中国实验室国家认可委员会技术委员会医学分委会.医学实验室质量管理与认可指南[M].北京:中国计量出版社,2004:72-75.
  • 10International Organization for Standardization. ISO15189 Medical. laboratories- particular requirements for quality and competence[S]. Geneva : ISO, 2003.

引证文献6

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部