摘要
本体诠释学应阐释为对本体发生的一种诠释,以区别于实体化的本体论。古希腊和中国从不同的进路来讨论存在,此差异表现为作为存在的存在(being as being)和作为发生与创造的存在(being as generative or creative)。通过界定本体诠释学的本体和追溯中西哲学的Logos与道,能够进一步展现出本体诠释学的四个核心范畴、五个命题。在此基础上可以探求如何实现超融、如何从诠释的方法看待本体诠释学。
How to understand onto-hermeneutics in a onto-hermeneutic way is the main concern of this article. I interpret onto-hermeneutics as hermeneutics of ontology as generative which is to be distinguished from ontology as reified objects. Here lies the difference between the Greek approach and Chinese approach to being, namely between being as being and being as gen- erative or creative. I have introduced four core categories, five propositions and the concept and act of transcendental integra- tion. How to transform or treat onto-hermeneutics interpreted in this manner as a methodology of interpretation will be the next enterprise.
出处
《齐鲁学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第5期5-11,共7页
Qilu Journal
关键词
发生的本体论
本体发生诠释学
外在性
内在性
超融
Generative ontology
onto-generative hermeneutics
externality
internality
transcendental integration
