期刊文献+

高阶理论:企业慈善捐赠研究的新视角 被引量:1

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 企业慈善捐赠逐渐发展成为企业与社会交叉领域研究的热点问题,但已有的研究却很少考察企业高管团队对企业慈善捐赠决策的影响作用。而高阶理论是高管团队研究的主导范式。因此,高阶理论为企业慈善捐赠研究提供了一个新的研究视角,可以通过研究高管团队的背景特征变量与企业慈善捐赠行为的关系来深入揭示高管团队对企业慈善捐赠决策的作用机理。
作者 孙德升
出处 《环渤海经济瞭望》 2013年第9期24-26,共3页
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R.The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2002,80(12).
  • 2Burlingame, D.F, Frishkoff, P.A. How Does Firm Size Affect Corporate Philanthrol[M]. In Burlingame and Young,(eds.),1996.
  • 3Hambrick,D.C. and Mason. EA. Upper Echelons:The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers[J].Aeademy of Management Review, 1984,9(2).
  • 4Thomas,A. and Simerly,R.,Internal Determinants of Corporate Social Per- formance:The Role of Top Managers [C], Presented at the August 1995 Academy of Management Meeting,Vancouver. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1995.
  • 5Knauft,E.B.The management of corporate giving programs.In R.Magat (Ed).Philanthropic giving:studies in varieties and goals[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 1989.
  • 6Schiff,J. Does government spending crowd out charitable contributions Na- tional Tax Journal[J].1985, (38).
  • 7Schiff,J. Charitable giving and government policy:an economic analysis [M].Greenwood Press,Westwood,Comr1990.
  • 8Park,T.K.,Park,S.B. An Economic Study on Charitable Giving of Individuals in Korea:Some New Findings from 2002 Data [C]. Presented at 6th International Conference of the International Society for Third sector, Research, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada, 2004.
  • 9孙德升.高管团队与企业社会责任:高阶理论的视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009,30(4):188-193. 被引量:79

二级参考文献22

  • 1Velasquez, M. Business ethics: concepts and cases[M]. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002
  • 2Wood, D.J. Social issues in management: Theory and research in corporate social performance[J]. Journal of Management, 1991, 17(2): 383-406
  • 3Thomas, A.S., Simerly, R.L. Internal determinants of corporate social performance: The role of top managers[J]. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1995, 2:411-415
  • 4Browne, S.E. Determinants of corporate social performance: An exploratory investigation of top management teams, CEO compensation, and CEO power[M]. Davie, FL: Nova Southeastern University Press, 2003
  • 5Hambrick, D.C., Mason, P.A. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(2): 193-206
  • 6Pfeffer, J. Organizational demography[M] // Cummings, L.L., Staw, B.M., et al. Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1983:299-357
  • 7Wiersema, M., Bantel, K.A. Top management demography and corporate strategic change[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1992, 35:91-121
  • 8Hambrick, D.C. Environment, strategy, and power within top management teams[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1981, 26:253-275
  • 9Cyert, R.M., March, J.G. A behavioral theory of the firm[M]. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-haU, 1963
  • 10Gupta, A. Contingency perspectives on strategic leadership Current knowledge and future research directions[M] //Hambrick, D.C., et al. The executive effect: Concepts and methods for studying top managers. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1988:47-178

共引文献78

同被引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部