期刊文献+

糖化血红蛋白在糖尿病及空腹血糖受损诊断中的价值 被引量:14

Value of HbA_1c in diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and impaired fasting glucose
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨HbA1c在糖尿病及IFG诊断中的意义。方法选取526名未诊断糖尿病及IFG者同时检测HbA1c和FPG。按ADA诊断标准(FPG≥7.0mmol/L)、IFG标准(5.6mmol/L≤FPG≤6.9mmol/L)和2010年ADA新标准(HbA1c≥6.5%及5.7%≤HbA1c≤6.4%)将研究对象分组。以FPG为"金标准",统计HbA1c诊断糖尿糖及IFG的敏感性(S)、特异性(Sp)、阳性似然比(+LR)、阴性似然比(-LR)。结果 HbA1c≥6.5%诊断糖尿病的S为96%,Sp为95%,+LR为19.2,-LR为0.042;5.7%≤HbA1c≤6.4%诊断IFG的S为26%,Sp为94%,+LR为4.3,-LR为0.79。结论 HbA1c诊断糖尿病有较高的诊断敏感性和特异性,在诊断IFG时特异性较高,而敏感性较低。 Objective To study the value of HbA1c in the diagnosis of DM and IFG. Methods The levels of HbA1c and FPG were measured in 526 subjects with suspected DM and IFG. The diagnosis of DM and IFG were made according to ADA diagnosis criteria, FPG ≥7. 0 mmol/L and IFG 5.6 mmol/L ≤FPG ≤6.9 mmol/L, and the new diagnosis criteria, HbAlc ≥6.5M for DM diagnosis and 5. 7% HbA1c ≤6.4% for pre-diabetes in 2010. The subjects were divided into groups. The diagnostic sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp), positive likelihood ratio (-bLR), and negative likelihood ratio (-LR) of HbA1c were calculated using FPG as reference. Results To diagnose DM with HbA1 c ≥6.5%: S is 96%, Sp is 95% +LR is 19.2, and -LR is 0.042; and to diagnose IFG with 5.7% ≤HbA1c ≤6.4% S is 26%, Sp is 94M, +LR is 4. 3, and -LR is 0.79. Conclusion HbA1c has a high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing DM, a high specificity but low sensitivity in diagnosing IFG.
出处 《中国糖尿病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第8期689-691,共3页 Chinese Journal of Diabetes
关键词 糖尿病 空腹血糖受损 空腹血糖 糖化血红蛋白 诊断价值 Diabetes mellitus Impaired fasting plasma glucose Fasting plasma glucose Glycosylated hemoglobin A1 c Diagnostic value
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2010. Diabetes Care, 2010, 33:692.
  • 2Rohlfing C, WieDmeyer HM, Little R, et al. Biological varia- tion of glycohemoglobiru Clin Chem, 2002, 48: 1116-1118.
  • 3Nathan DM, Kuenen J, Borg R, et al. Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values. Diabetes Care, 2008, 31:1473-1478.
  • 4Mann DM, Carson AP, Shimbo D, et al. Impact of A1C screening criterion on the diagnosis of pre-diabetes among U. S. Adults. Diabetes Care, 2010, 33:2190-2195.
  • 5Cohen RM, Franco RS, Khera PK, et al. Red cell lifespan heterogeneity in hematologieally normal people is sufficient to alter HbA1 c. Blood, 2008, 112:4284-4291.
  • 6Pani LN, Korenda L, Meigs JB, et al. Effects of aging on AiC levels in individuals without diabetes: evidence from the Framingham Offspring Study and the National Health and Nu- trition Examination Survey. Diabetes Care, 2008, 31: 1991-1996.
  • 7Jorgensen ME, Bjerregaard P, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. New diagnostic criteria for diabetes: is the change from glucose to HbAlc possible in all populations? J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2010, 95:333-336.
  • 8Bao Y, Ma X, Li H, et al. Glycated haemoglobin Alc for di- agnosing diabetes in Chinese population: cross sectional epide- miological survey, BMJ, 2010, 340:c2249.

同被引文献126

引证文献14

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部