期刊文献+

吻合器痔上黏膜环切术与外剥内扎术治疗重度痔疮的远期疗效对比观察 被引量:16

The Comparative Observation of the Long-term Effects about Severe Hemorrhoids between PPH and Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(PPH)与外剥内扎术远期疗效。方法:将2005年1月-2006年12月重度痔病患者分为两组,治疗组行PPH术,对照组行传统手术,对远期疗效进行对比分析。结果:两组60个月观察数据中并发症之一"肛门坠胀或急便感"发生率对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其他观察指标包括复发率、总的并发症发生率、患者满意度对比差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:PPH治疗重度痔疮远期并发症中"肛门坠胀"发生率较外剥内扎术高,其余远期疗效差异不大。 Objective: To compare the long-term effects between PPH and Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy.Method: The patients with severe hemorrhoids were divided into treatment group and control group randomly from January 2005 to December 2006.Treatmem group ( 42 cases ) was treated with PPH.Control group (40 cases )was treated with MiUigan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy.And the long-term effects were analyzed and compared.Result: The rate of anal bulge which one of comphcations in 60 months of observation data was statistically significant ( P〈0.05 ) .The other indexes including total recurrence rate, complication rate, patients satisfaction were no significant differences ( P〉0.05 ) .Conclusion: The anal bulge rate of severe hemorrhoids long-term complications which treated with PPH is higher than which teated with Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy.The other long-term effect has no diffenence.
出处 《中国医学创新》 CAS 2013年第21期48-50,共3页 Medical Innovation of China
关键词 PPH 外剥内扎术 远期疗效 PPH Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy Hemorrhoids Long-term effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1LONGO A.Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorhoidal proplase with a cireular suturing device:a new procedure[C].Italy:proceedings of the6th.World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery,1998:777-784.
  • 2痔临床诊治指南(2006版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(5):461-463. 被引量:2157
  • 3痔诊断和治疗指南(2010修订版)[J].中华消化外科杂志,2012,11(3):243-247. 被引量:235
  • 4中医药管理局.《中医肛肠科诊断疗效标准》[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2012:7.
  • 5Nisar P J,Acheson A G,Neal K R,et al.Stapled hemorrhoidopexy comparedwith conventional hemorrhoidectomy:systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2004,47(11):1837-1845.
  • 6罗光辉,冉墨,李忠华,钟世镇.局麻下吻合器痔上黏膜环切术的临床研究进展[J].广东医学,2010,31(13):1766-1767. 被引量:5
  • 7Hass P A,Fox Jr T A.Age-related changes and scar formations of perianal connective tissue[J].Dis Colon Rectum,1980,23(3):160.
  • 8陈云,徐增绶.痔的病理形态学及发病机理的研究[J].中国肛肠病杂志,1992,12(1):3-7. 被引量:10
  • 9Loder P B,Kamm M A,Nicholls R J,et al.Haemorrhoids pathology,pathophysiology and aetiology[J].Br-Surg,1994,81(7):946-954.
  • 10Cheetham M J,Cohen C R,Kamm M A,et a1.A randomized,controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidopexy vs.stapled hemorrhoidopexy in an intended day-care setting with longer te rra follow up[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2003,46(4):491-497.

二级参考文献18

  • 1《痔上黏膜环形切除钉合术(PPH)暂行规范》修订[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2005,8(4):342-342. 被引量:236
  • 2陈永年,罗光辉,苏兴桂,何军强,余启文,吴超斌,周宏,宋涛.单荷包四点牵引法在痔疮PPH术中的应用[J].广东医学,2006,27(3):375-376. 被引量:2
  • 3李忠华,李科,罗光辉,邱小忠,苏兴桂,丁自海,钟世镇.肛神经阻滞麻醉的解剖学基础研究[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2007,25(4):403-405. 被引量:5
  • 4吴孟超,吴在德.黄家驷外科学[M].7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:1832-1842.
  • 5SLAWIK S,KENEFICK N,GREENSLADE G L,et al.A prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy/rectal mucosectomy in the management of 3rd and 4th degree hemorrhoids[J].Colorectal Dis,2007,9(4):352-356.
  • 6GANIO E,ALTOMARE D F,MILITO G,et al.Title Long-term outcome of a multicentre randomized clinical trial of stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy[J].Source Brit J Surg,2007,94(8):1033-1037.
  • 7LOMANTO D,KATARA A N.Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for prolapsed haemorrhoids:short-and long-term experience[J].Asian J Surg,2007,30 (1):29-33.
  • 8罗光辉.探讨PPH技术在治疗重度痔疮中的临床价值.医师进修杂志,2003,26(7):1-1.
  • 9Kok-Yang Tan,Francis Seow-Choen.Fiber and colorectal diseases: Separating fact from fiction[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2007,13(31):4161-4167. 被引量:11
  • 10安阿玥.肛肠病学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:254-258

共引文献2366

同被引文献81

引证文献16

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部