社会资本、乡村公共品供给与乡村治理——基于10省17村农户调查被引量：48

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文利用全国10省17村494户农户调查数据,对农村社区公共品提供中社会资本、村庄特征对于农户参与程度的影响进行分析。利用主成分分析提取参与程度和社会资本的因子,并进行OLS及稳健性回归,结论发现农户的社会资本对于农户在乡村公共品提供中的参与程度具有积极作用,这主要体现在农户的"公共意识"、"政治意识"、"社团互助"、"社区认同"、"社区信任"等因子。村庄特征对于农户公共品提供中的参与行为也产生显著影响,村庄的流动性提高会降低农户的参与程度,但是村庄的封闭性和合作化程度提高会提高农户的参与程度。同时,公共品提供中对于农户的号召会对农户的参与产生积极的影响,建设中召开村民大会能显著提高农户的参与程度。

作者李冰冰王曙光

机构地区清华大学经济管理学院北京大学经济学院

出处《经济科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期61-71,共11页 Economic Science

关键词农村公共品社会资本农户参与乡村治理

分类号 F812.8 [经济管理—财政学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献20

1蔡晓莉,刘丽.中国乡村公共品的提供:连带团体的作用[J].经济社会体制比较,2006(2):104-112. 被引量：44
2胡荣.社会资本与中国农村居民的地域性自主参与——影响村民在村级选举中参与的各因素分析[J].社会学研究,2006(2):61-85. 被引量：199
3林南,《社会资本-关于社会结构与行动的理论》[M],上海人民出版社,2005.
4宋紫峰,周业安,何其新.不平等厌恶和公共品自愿供给--基于实验经济学的初步研究[J].管理世界,2011,27(12):32-39. 被引量：37
5张林秀,李强,罗仁福,刘承芳,罗斯高.中国农村公共物品投资情况及区域分布[J].中国农村经济,2005(11):18-25. 被引量：73
6Andreoni J., 1995, "Cooperation in Public-Goods Experiments. Kindness or Confusion?" [J], The American Economic Review, 85(4), pp891-904.
7Axelrod, Robert M. 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation[M]. New York. Basic Books.
8Besley T. and Coate S., 1995, "Group Lending, Repayment Incentives and Social Collateral" [J], Journal of Development Economics, 46 (1), pp1-18.
9Fehr E. & Gachter S., 2000, "Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments" [J], The American Economic Review, 90(4), pp980-994.
10Fischbacher U., Giichter S., Fehr E., 2001, "Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence From a Public Goods Experiment" [J], Economics Letters, 71, pp397-404.

二级参考文献96

1联合国开发计划署.《2010年人类发展报告:人口发展的途径》.http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2010/chapters/cn/,2010年.
2Anderson, L. R., Mellor, J. M.and Milyo, J., 2008, "Inequality and Public Good Provision: An Experimental Analysis", Journal ofSocio-Economics, 37 ( 3 ), pp. 1010-1028.
3Ashley, R., Ball, S. and Eckel, C., 2005, "Motives for Giving: A Reanalysis of Two Classic Public Goods Experiments", Mimeo, Department of Economics, Virginia Tech.
4Bagnoli, M. and McKee, M., 1991, "Voluntary Contribution Games: Efficient Private Provision of Public Goods", Economic Inquiry, 29 (2), pp.351-366.
5Buekley, E. and Croson, R., 2006, "Income and Wealth Heterogeneity in the Voluntary Provision of Linear Public Goods", Journal of Public Economics, 90 (4-5), pp.935-955.
6Carpenter, J. P., 2007, "Punishing Free-riders: How Group Size Affects Mutual Monitoring and the Provision of Public Goods", Games and Economic Behavior, 60 ( 1 ), pp.31 -51.
7Chan, K. S., Mestelman, S., Muir, R. and Muller, R. A., 1996, "The Voluntary Provision of Public Goods under Varying In- come Distributions" , Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadicnne d' Economique, 29 ( 1 ), pp.54-69.
8Chan, K. S., Mestelman, S., Moir, R. and Muller, R. A., 1999, "Heterogeneity and the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods", Experimental Economics, 2 ( 1 ), pp.5-30.
9Chan,K. S.,Mestelman,S.,Moir,R. and Muller,R. A., 2003, "Heterogeneity, Communication, Coordination and Voluntary Provision of a Public Good", working paper, McMaster University.
10Cherry, T. L., Kroll, S. and Shogren, J. F., 2005, "The Impact of Endowment Heterogeneity and Origin on Public Good Contributions: Evidence from the Lab", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 57 ( 3 ), pp.357-365,.