期刊文献+

大股东增持的市场反应及内幕交易程度——基于不同产权主体的研究

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章利用事件研究法研究国有企业与非国有企业大股东增持事件的市场反应及内幕交易情况。实证表明,大股东增持为国有企业带来的异常收益率要远远高于非国有企业,说明非国有企业大股东挖空企业的"掏空效应"要远比国有企业严重。在短期内,大股东增持能为国有企业带来约8.7%的累积异常收益率,但为非国有企业带来的累积异常收益率仅为1.9%。在长期内,国有企业大股东增持的累积异常收益率约为0,"支持效应"与"掏空效应"基本持平。但非国有企业大股东增持在长期的累积异常收益率约为-23.8%,"掏空效应"占主导地位。同时,对大股东增持事件的超额换手率的研究表明大股东增持过程中普遍存在着严重的内幕交易。
出处 《现代商业》 2013年第14期20-22,共3页 Modern Business
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献40

  • 1李勇.对“内部人”交易信息披露制度的经济分析[J].预测,2004,23(6):59-61. 被引量:6
  • 2李增泉,孙铮,任强.所有权安排与现金股利政策——来自我国上市公司的经验证据[J].中国会计与财务研究,2004,6(4):48-93. 被引量:34
  • 3M.S. Rozeff, M. A. Zaman, "Market Efficiency and Insider Trading: New Evidence," Journal of Business, vol. 61, no. 1, 1988, pp. 25-44.
  • 4A. Gregory, J. Matatko, I. Tonks and R. Purkis, "UK Directors' Trading: The Impact of Dealings in Smaller Firms, " The Economic Journal, vol. 104, no. 422, 1994, pp. 37-53.
  • 5D. Hillier and A.P. Marshall, "The Market Evaluation of Information in Directors' Trades, " Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, vol. 29,no.1/2, 2002, pp. 77-110.
  • 6R. Comment and G. Jarrell, "The Relative Signaling Power of Dutch-Auction and Fixed-Price Self-Tender Offers and Open-Market Share Repurchases, " Journal of Finance, vol. 46, no. 4, 1991, pp. 1243-1271.
  • 7P. Brockman, D.Y. Chung, "Managerial Timing and Corporate Liquidity: Evidence from Actual Share Repurchases," Journa/of Financial Economics, vol. 61, no.3, 2001, pp. 417-448.
  • 8D.O. Cook, L. Krigman and J. C. Leach, "On the Timing and Execution of Open Market Repurchases, " The Review of Financial Studies, vol. 17, no. 2, 2004, pp. 463-498.
  • 9W.J. McNally, B.F. Smith and T. Barnes, "The Price Impact of Repurchase Trade, " SSRN working loader. 2006.
  • 10S.A. Corwin, "The Determinants of Underpricing for Seasoned Equity Offers, " Journal of Finance, vol. 58, no.S, 2003, pp. 2249-2279.

共引文献1054

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部