期刊文献+

3岁前儿童口腔疾病综合防治项目完成3年后效果评价 被引量:8

Effectiveness evaluation of comprehensive prevention and treatment project of oral diseases at three years after implementation in children under three years
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价追踪实施3岁前儿童口腔疾病综合防治项目完成3年后的效果。方法:参加《3岁前儿童口腔常见疾病综合防治措施的纵向研究》课题的试验组3岁儿童60例随机分为两组各30例:干预组:定期回访,口腔干预;对照组:不进行随访及口腔预防,仅针对龋病就诊时充填。3年后两组进行回访及口腔检查。两组均对幼儿进行龋病、牙面软垢指数、牙列咬合关系的调查记录。同时也进行家长问卷调查。数据采用EpiData 3.0录入,应用SPSS 13.0完成数据分析。结果:3年后干预组儿童回访29例,失访1例,对照组儿童回访24例,失访6例。两组口腔健康状况比较显示:干预组患龋率为6.90%,对照组为33.33%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预组儿童的龋均为0.48,对照组则为0.96;咬合关系两组差异无统计学意义。两组儿童母亲口腔保健知识知晓情况比较:幼儿母亲口腔保健知识的14项目知识指标中仅有2项对于孩子刷牙,家长采取措施方面,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:该项目健康教育与行为干预模式效果明显,但持续性改进至关重要,回访追踪才能取得更佳效果。 Objective: To evaluate and track the effectiveness of comprehensive prevention and treatment project of oral diseases at three years after implementation in children under three years. Methods: Sixty 3 - year - old children who had taken part in the study of comprehensive intervention on pediatric oral diseaBes among children under three yeats were selected and randomly divided into two groups, 30 children in each group: the children in intervention group received regular follow - up and oral interventlon, while the children in control group didnt receive follow - up and oral intervention, but caries in control group was treated. After three years, follow - up and oral examina- tion were conducted in the two groups, Caries, debris indexes, and occluding relationships in the two groups were investigated and recorded. At the same time, a questionnaire investigation was conducted among the parents. The data were entered by EpiData 3.0 software and ana- lyzed statistically by SPSS 13.0 software. Results: After three years, 29 children were followed up and one child was lost to follow-up in intervention group; while in control group, 24 children were followed up and six children were lost to follow - up. The incidence rates of caries in intervention group and cantrel group were 6. 90% and 33.33%, respectively, there was statistically significant difference between the two groups ( P 〈 0. 05 ) ; DMFT numbers in intervention group and control group were 0.48 and 0. 96, respectively; there was no statisti- cally significant difference in occluding relationship between the two groups. Among 14 indexes of oral health knowledge among the mothers, there were statistically significant differences in two indexes between the two groups (P 〈 0.05) . Conclusion: The effect of health educa- tion and behavioral intervention mode is obvious, but continuous improvement is very important, follow- up can obtain more better effects.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第11期1704-1707,共4页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
基金 广西卫生医疗科研课题〔桂卫Z2005123〕2010年广西医药卫生适宜技术推广奖二等奖
关键词 口腔保健模式 口腔健康教育 综合干预措施 6年追踪 Oral health mode Oral health education Comprehensive interventional measure Six - year follow - up
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1施春梅,周嫣,韦惠平,江蕙芸,樊青会,陈红慧,王少英,曹秀芳,钟秀芬.3岁前儿童口腔疾病综合防治项目终期效果评价[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2011,27(4):549-552. 被引量:9
  • 2全国牙病防治指导组.第三次全国口腔健康流行病学抽样调查[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:46-47.
  • 3邓汉辉,黄华,李志辉,章鉴伟.1043名学龄前儿童龋病状况调查[J].广西医科大学学报,2003,20(6):976-977. 被引量:6
  • 4施春梅,周嫣,韦惠平,王少英,樊青会.妊娠期妇女口腔健康教育的实施策略与具体方案[J].中国妇幼保健,2009,24(2):158-159. 被引量:4
  • 5Vachirarojpisan T,Shinada K,Kawaguchi Y.The process andoutcome of a programme for preventing early childhood caries inThailand[J].Community Dent Health,2005,22(4):253-259.
  • 6Ashwin R,Arathi R.Comparative evaluation for microleakagebetween Fuji-VII glass ionomer cement and light-cured un-filled resin:A combined in vivo in vitro study[J].Journal ofIndian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry,2007,25(2):86-87.

二级参考文献14

  • 1周晓萍.妊娠期妇女的口腔保健[J].中国妇幼保健,2004,19(11):127-128. 被引量:1
  • 2施春梅,周嫣,王少英,韦惠平,曹秀芳,樊青会.孕妇口腔健康教育即时效果评价[J].广东牙病防治,2007,15(2):79-80. 被引量:9
  • 3施春梅,韦惠平,王少英,唐继伟,曹秀芳.大众与牙科专业人员口腔保健知识认知水平的调查分析[J].广西医学,2007,29(2):232-233. 被引量:3
  • 4Mills LW, Moses DT. Oral health during pregnancy. Am J Meternal Child Nurs, 2002, 27 (4): 275.
  • 5全国牙病防治指导组.第三次全国口腔健康流行病学拙样调查[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:46-47.
  • 6Mills LW, Moses DT. Oral health during pregnancy[J]. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs,2002,27 (5) :275 - 280.
  • 7铃木祐司.初孕妇指道と4カ月儿指道[J],目筹筛代ほか,齿界展望[J].1987,:337-342.
  • 8Mattila ML,Rautava P, Sillanpaa M, et al. Caries in five- year-old children and associations with family-related factors [J]. J Dent Res,2000,79(3):875 -881.
  • 9Morgan MA, Crall J, Goldenberq RL, et al. Oral health during pregnancy[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2009, 22(9) :733 -739.
  • 10Hohzman J. Simple, Effective--and inexpensive--strategies to reduce tooth decay in children [ J ]. Infant, Cilild, Ado- lescent Nutri, 2009,1 (4) :225 - 231.

共引文献40

同被引文献54

引证文献8

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部