期刊文献+

不同容量和浓度罗哌卡因经喙突入路臂丛神经阻滞的效果 被引量:20

Brachial plexus block with different volume and concentration of ropivacaine through coracoid approach on clinical outcome
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较不同容量和浓度罗哌卡因经喙突入路臂丛神经阻滞的安全性及其效果。方法选择择期上肢手术患者150例,随机分成三组,每组50例。将罗哌卡因150mg稀释到30ml(0.5%,A组)、40ml(0.375%,B组)和50ml(0.3%,C组)。在喙突内下2cm处,经神经刺激器引导下注入罗哌卡因。记录三组不良反应、臂丛神经感觉和运动阻滞起效时间、感觉、运动阻滞时间及阻滞成功率。结果 A组(82%)阻滞成功率明显低于B组(98%)、C组(94%)(P<0.05)。C组感觉、运动阻滞起效时间明显长于A、B组(P<0.05);感觉、运动阻滞时间明显短于A、B组(P<0.05)。三组发生局麻药中毒A、B和C组分别为4例、0例和2例。结论在喙突入路臂丛神经阻滞中150mg罗哌卡因40ml更安全,麻醉阻滞成功率更高,临床效果更好。 Objective To investigate the safety and clinical outcome of brachial plexus block (BPB) through modified coracoid approach using the same dose of ropivacaine in various volume. Methods One hundred fifty patients undergoing upper extremity surgery were randomly divided into group A(0. 5%,30 ml), group B(0. 375%, 40 ml) and group C(0.3%,50 ml) with 50 cases each. Ropivacaine 150 mg was diluted into 30 ml, 40 ml or 50 ml. BPB was performed at the point 2 cm caudal and 2 cm medial to the coracoid directed by nerve stimulator. Adverse reactions, the sensory and motor blockade onset time, the successful rate was recorded. Results The rate of successful blockade in group A (82%) was lower than that in group B (98%) and C (94%) (P〈0.05). The sensory and motor blockade onset time in group C was longer than that in group A and B(P〈0.05), and sensory and motor blockade durations in group C was shorter than that in group A and B(P〈0. 05). There were 4,0 and 2 patients who had an local anesthetics intoxication in group A, B and C, respectively. Conclusion 150 mg ropivacaine 40 ml provides safer, higher successful rate of blockade, and better clinical outcome during BPB through coracoid approach.
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期16-18,共3页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
关键词 罗哌卡因 喙突 臂丛神经阻滞 神经刺激仪 Ropivaeaine Coraeoid Brachial plexus block Nerve stimulator
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Niemi TT,Salmela L,Aromaa U. Single-injection brachial plexus anesthesia for arteriovenous fistula surgery of the forearm:a comparison of infraclavicular coracoid and axillary approach[J].Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine,2007,(01):55-59.
  • 2Rodrguez J,Taboada M,Oliveira J. Single stimulation of the posterior cord is superior to dual nerve stimulation in a coracoid block[J].Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica,2010,(02):241-245.
  • 3李佩盈,车薛华,顾华华,梁伟民.定位臂丛神经后束对锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞效果的影响[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(29):2058-2061. 被引量:11
  • 4顾华华,车薛华,李佩盈,梁伟民.刺激电流大小对上肢肘以下外科手术患者锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞成功率的影响[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(21):1470-1473. 被引量:11
  • 5Mio Y,Fukuda N,Kusakari Y. Comparative effects of bupivacaine and ropivacaine on intracellular calcium transients and tension in ferret ventricular muscle[J].Anesthesiology,2004,(04):888-894.
  • 6Casati A,Santorsola R,Aldegheri G. Intraoperative epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with levobupivacaine for major orthopedic surgery:a double-blind,randomized comparison of racemic bupivacaine and ropivacaine[J].Journal of Clinical Anesthesia,2003,(02):126.
  • 7Borgeat A,Blumenthal S,Lambert M. The feasibility and complication of the continuous popliteal nerve block:a 1001-case survey[J].Anesthesia and Analgesia,2006,(01):229-233.
  • 8Cruvinel MG,Castro CH,Silva YP. A comparative study on the postoperative analgesic efficacy of 20,30,or 40 mL of ropivacaine in posterior brachial plexus block[J].Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia,2007,(05):500-513.
  • 9Mageswaran R,Choy YC. Comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine for infraclavicular brachial plexus block[J].Medical Journal of Malaysia,2010,(05):300-303.
  • 10llfeld BM,Moeller LK,Mariano ER. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks:is local anesthetic dose the only factor,or do concentration and volume influence infusion effects as well[J].Anesthesiology,2010,(02):347-354.

二级参考文献37

  • 1McClure JH. Ropivacaine. Br J Anaesth, 1996,76:300-307.
  • 2Feldman HS, Arthur GR, Covino BG. Comparateve systemic toxicity of convulsant and supraconvulsant doses of intravenous ropivacaine, bupivacaine, lidocaine in the conscious dog. Anesth Analg, 1989,69:794-801.
  • 3Scott DB, Lee A, Fagan D, et al. Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared with that of bupivacaine. Anesth Analg, 1989, 69: 563 -569.
  • 4Brockway MS, Bannister J, McClure JH, et al. Comparison of tradural ropivacaine and bupivacaine. Br J Anesth, 1991,66: 31-37.
  • 5Krone SC ,Chan VW,Regan J, et al. Analgesic effects of low-dose ropivacaine for interscalene brachial plexus block for outpatient shoulder surgery- a dose-finding study. Reg Anesth pain Med, 2001,26:439.
  • 6Vester-Andersen T, Husum B, Lindeburg T, et al. Perlvascular axillary block IV, block following 40,50,60 ral of mepivacaine 1% with adrenaline. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1984,28:99-105.
  • 7Khstad O,Smedby,Thompson G. Distribution of local anesthetic in axillary brachial plexus block : a clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study. Anesthesiology ,2002,96 : 1315-1324.
  • 8Pippa P,Cuomo P,Panchetti A,et al.High volume and low concentration of anaesthetic solution in the perivascular interscalene sheath determines quality of block and incidence of complications.Eur J Anaesthesiol,2006,23;855-860.
  • 9Casati A,Borghi B,Fanelli G,et al.Intersealene brachial plexus anesthesia and analgesia for open shoulder surgery:a randomized.double-blinded comparrison between levobupivacaine and ropivacaine.Anesth Analg,2003,96:253-259.
  • 10Sia S,Bartoti M.Selective ulnar nerve localization is not essential for axillary brachial plexus block using a multiple nerve stimulation technique.Reg Anesth Pain Med,2001,26:12-16.

共引文献50

同被引文献114

引证文献20

二级引证文献306

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部