期刊文献+

人工助孕子代的体格和神经精神发育状况 被引量:4

Physiological and neuropsychological development in children born after assisted reproductive technology
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨辅助生殖技术(assisted reproductive technology,ART)受孕的子代新生儿期和远期的体格和神经精神发育状况,以评价ART的安全性。方法选取2006年1月至2011年6月在南京军区福州总医院生殖中心借助ART受孕并成功分娩的孕妇的84例6个月~6岁的儿童作为ART子代组,同期自然受孕者的子代84例作为对照组。χ2或t检验比较2组儿童新生儿期及6个月~6岁时的体格和神经精神发育状况。结果ART子代和自然受孕子代的新生儿期情况(母亲生育年龄、母妊娠合并糖尿病、母妊娠期高血压疾病、分娩方式、居住地、父母受教育程度、出生身长、出生体重、早产、低出生体重、出生窒息、人住新生儿重症监护病房)差异均无统计学意义(P均〉0.05)。ART子代发育迟缓的发生率为6.0%(5/84),社会生活能力有问题的发生率为1.2%(1/84),与自然受孕子代[4.8%(4/84)和1.2%(1/84)]差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.12和0.00,P均〉0.05)。ART子代的发育商与自然受孕子代相比,差异也无统计学意义[(95.9±6.1)分与(94.8±5.1)分,t=1.25,P=0.21]。但双胎儿童较单胎儿童有更高的早产率[41.8%(33/79)与10.1%(9/89),χ2=22.37,OR=6.38,95%CI:2.81~14.50,P=0.00]、低出生体重率[51.9%(41/79)与6.7%(6/89),χ2=42.35,OR=14.93,95%CI:5.84~38.16,P=0.00]、出生窒息率[10.1%(8/79)与1.1%(1/89),χ2=6.69,OR=9.92,95%CI:1.21~81.15,P=0.01]、入住新生儿重症监护病房率[36.7%(29/79)与14.6%(13/89),χ2=10.90,OR=3.39,95%CI:1.61~7.14,P=0.00]和发育迟缓率[11.4%(9/79)与0.0%(0/89),χ2=10.71,RR=10.11,P=0.00]。结论ART似乎没有对子代的体格和神经精神发育状况产生不良影响,但双胎是使早产儿、低出生体重儿、出生窒息、入住NICU、发育迟缓发生率增加的重要因素,需控制ART导致的双胎及多胎妊娠率。 Objective To analysis newborn stage and long-term physiological and neuropsychological development in children born after assisted reproductive technology(ART), and to evaluate the safety of ART. Methods Eighty-four 6-month-old to 6-yea-old children born after ART performed from January 1st, 2006 to June 30th, 2011 in Reproduction Center of Fuzhou General Hospital were taken as ART group; and 84 matched children born after spontaneous conception were as control group. The physiological and neuropsychological states of these children in their newborn stage and 6 month-old to 6 year-old duration were compared with Chi square or t test. Results There was no statistical difference in childbearing age of mothers, the prevalence of gcstational diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy, delivery mode, living environment, parents' education level, newborn birth length, birth weight, the rate of premature birth, low birth weight, asphyxia and hospitalized to neonatal intensive care unit between two groups (P〉0.05). In ART group, the incidence of growth retardation and abnormal social life skills was 6.0% (5/84) and 1.2%(1/84), and no statistical difference were found comparing with control guoup [4.8%(4/84) and 1.2%(1/84),χ2 =0.12 and 0. 00,P〉0. 05], neither the developmental quotient (95.9±6.1 vs 94.8±5.1,t=1. 25,P=0.21). Twins had higher rates of preterm birth [41.8%(33/79) vs 10.1%(9/89), χ2 =22.37, OR:6.38, 95:CI: 2.81-14.50, P=0.00], low birth weight [51.9%(41/79) vs 6.7%(6/89), χ2=42.35, OR=14.93, 95%CI: 5.84-38. 16, P=0. 001, asphyxia [10.1%(8/79) vs 1.1%(1/89), χ2=6.69, OR=9.92, 95%CI: 1.21-81.15, P=0. 011, hospitalized to neonatal intensive care unit [36. 7% (29/79) vs 14. 6% (13/89), χ2=10.90, OR- 3.39, 95%CI: 1.61-7.14, P=0. 00] and growth retardation [11. 4%(9/79) vs 0.0%(0/89),χ2 = 10.71, RR=0. 11, P 0. 001 than singleton. Conclusions ART has no negative effects on children's physical and neuropsychologieal development. It could increase the incidence of twins, so that it might increase the incidences of preterm labor and low birth weight, which might affect the long-term physical and neuropsychological development of the offspring.
出处 《中华围产医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第12期710-715,共6页 Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine
关键词 生殖技术 辅助 婴儿 新生 儿童 身高 体重 儿童发育 Reproductive techniques, assisted Infant, newborn Child Body size Body weight Child development
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献28

  • 1曹泽毅.中华妇产科学(第一版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.1260-1261.
  • 2WHO Multicenter Growth Reference Study Group. WHO child growth standards: length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight- for-length, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age: Methods and development. Geneva: World Health Organization. [ 2007-06-01 ]. http ://www. who. int/zh.
  • 3Freeman JV, Cole TJ, Chinn S, et ah Cross sectional stature and weight reference curves for the UK, 1990. Arch Dis Child, 1995, 73 : 17-24.
  • 4Eveleth PB, Tanner JM. Worldwide Variation in human growth (Seeond edition ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990 : 44-62.
  • 5Li H, Leung SSF, Lam PKW, et ah Height and weight percentile curves of Beijing children and adolescents 0-18 years, 1995. Ann Hum Bio, 1999, 26: 457-471.
  • 6Leung SSF, Lau JTF, Xu YY, et ah Secular changes in standing height, sitting height and sexual maturation of Chinese-the Hong Kong Growth Study, 1993. Ann Hum Bio, 1996, 23: 297-306.
  • 7Cole TJ. Fitting smoothed centile curves to reference data. J R Star Soc,1988, 151 : 385-418.
  • 8Cole TJ, Green PJ. Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS lnethod and penalized likelihood. Stat Med, 1992, 11: 1305- 1319.
  • 9中华人民共和国卫生部妇幼卫生司,九市儿童体格发育调查研究协作组.1995年中国儿市7岁以下儿童体格发育调奄研究.北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1998:3-11.
  • 10Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Guo SS, et al. 2000 CDC growth charts for the United States: methods and development. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Star,2002,246 : 1-190.

共引文献286

同被引文献24

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部