6Sickles EA. Quality Assurance: how to audit your own rnammograpractice[J]. Radiol Clin North Am, 1992,30 (1) : 265-- 275.
7Hermann KP, Obenauer S, Funke M, et al. Magnification mammography:a comparis on of full--field digital mammography and screen--film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications[J]. Eur Radiol, 2002,12 (9) : 2188 --2191.
8Fischer U,Baum F, Obenauer S, et al. Comparative study in patients with microcalcification:full--field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography[J]. Eur Radiol, 2002,12 (11) : 2679 --2683.
9Stavros AT,Thickman D, Rapp CL, et al. Solid breast nodulesuse of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions[J]. Radiology, 1995,19(6) : 123-- 134.
10Yang L,Parkin DM,Ferlay J,et al.Estimates of cancer incidence in China for 2000 and projections for 2005[J].Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev,2005,14(1):243-250.
2Van- Goethem M,Tjalma W,Schelfout K,et al.Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancerJ .EurJ Surg Onco1,2006,32(9):901-910.
3Schlossbauer T,Hellerhoff K,Reiser M,et al.Value of breast MRI as supplement to mammography and sonography for high risk breast cancer patients.Radiologe,2008,48(11):351-357.
4Warren P,.M,Pointon L,Thompson D,et al.Reading protocol for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast:sensitivity and specificity analvsis.Radiology,2005,236(3) :779-788.
