期刊文献+

咪达唑仑、丙泊酚联合用于瓣膜置换术后患者的效果观察 被引量:3

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察咪达唑仑、丙泊酚联合用于心脏瓣膜置换术后患者的镇静效果。方法将400例心脏瓣膜置换术后患者根据入ICU顺序随机分为两组,实验组采用咪达唑仑联合丙泊酚镇静,对照组采用单纯丙泊酚镇静,比较两组患者停药后苏醒时间、苏醒后拔管时间、拔管后镇静评分、丙泊酚用量、不良反应。结果实验组苏醒时间(5.7±0.3)min,对照组苏醒时间(10.3±1.5)min,P<0.05;拔管时间实验组短于对照组,P<0.05;两组镇静评分P>0.05,差异无统计学意义;丙泊酚用量对照组明显高于实验组,P<0.05。结论丙泊酚联合咪达唑仑用于心脏瓣膜置换术后患者镇静效果优于单纯应用丙泊酚,值得推广。
作者 李昊 刘鹤冰
出处 《哈尔滨医科大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第5期516-517,共2页 Journal of Harbin Medical University
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献24

  • 1范婷,安建雄,严相默.芬太尼或雷米芬太尼复合丙泊酚用于无痛人工流产麻醉质量的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(6):479-480. 被引量:20
  • 2[1]Munte S, Adams HA.Stand-by and conscious sedation-possibilities and limits of anesthesiological management[J].Anaesthesiol Reanim,2001,26(2):47.
  • 3[2]White PF. Ambulatory anesthesia and surgery: past, present and future[M]. In: White PF, ed. Ambulatory anesthesia & surgery. London: W B Saunders, 1997.33.
  • 4[3]Kazama T, Ikeda K, Morita K. The pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and fentanyl with respect to the suppression of somatic or hemodynamic responses to skin incision, peritoneum incision, and abdominal wall retraction[J].Anesthesiology,1998,89(4):898.
  • 5[4]Slonim AD, Ognibene FP.Sedation for pediatric procedures, using ketamine and midazolam, in a primarily adult intensive care unit: a retrospective evaluation[J].Crit Care Med,1998,26(11):1903.
  • 6[5]Whitwam Jg. Co-induction of anaesthesia: day-case surgery[J]. European J of Anaesthesiology-Supplement,1995,12.28.
  • 7[1]White PF, Vasconez LO, Mathes SA, et al. Comparison of midazolam and diazepam for sedation during plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1988,81: 703 ~710.
  • 8[2]Bailey PL, Pace NL, Ashburn MA, et al. Frequent hypoxemia and apnea after sedation with midazolam and fentanyl. Anesthesiolgy, 1990,73 :826 ~ 830.
  • 9[4]Schnid RL, Sandler AN, Katz J. Use and efficacy of low-dose ketamine in the management of acute postoperative pain: a review of current techniques and outcomes. Pain, 1999,82: 111 ~ 125.
  • 10[5]Bowdle TA, Radant AD, Cowley DS, et al. Psychedelic effects of ketamine in healthy volunteers:relationship to steadystate plasma concentrations.Anesthesiology, 1998,88: 82 ~ 88.

共引文献232

同被引文献53

  • 1盛继红,叶仕新,杨胜生,曾志勇,程先进.改良超滤对成人重症心脏瓣膜置换术的影响[J].临床军医杂志,2010,38(6):904-906. 被引量:3
  • 2张耀中,姚嵩梅,赵国庆,巴凤海.咪达唑仑和丙泊酚麻醉对胃癌手术患者围术期血浆细胞因子的影响[J].吉林大学学报(医学版),2006,32(3):501-503. 被引量:6
  • 3郑增旺,王克杰.咪达唑仑和丙泊酚用于全身麻醉效果的比较[J].首都医科大学学报,2006,27(3):386-388. 被引量:9
  • 4李淑琴,张利勇,王保国.丙泊酚诱导期不良反应的多中心、大样本调查[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(10):738-739. 被引量:74
  • 5Kim JH, Byun H, Kim JH. Abuse potential of pro- pofol used for sedation in gastric endoscopy and its correlation with subject characteristics. Korean J Anesthesiol 2013. 65:403-409 [PMID: 24363842 DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2013.65.5.403].
  • 6Lee S. Guilty, or not guilty?: a short story of pro- pofol abuse. Korean J Anesthesiol 2013. 65:377-378 [PMID: 24363838 DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2013.65.5.377].
  • 7Haynes SR, Lawler PG. An assessment of the con- sistency of ASA physical status classification alloca- tion. Anaesthesia 1995. 50:195-199 [PMID: 7717481 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb04554.x].
  • 8Gu JW, Yang T, Kuang YQ, Huang HD, Kong B, Shu HF, Yu SX, Zhang JH. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of propofol with midazolam for seda- tion of patients with severe traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysis. J Crit Care 2014. 29:287-290 [PMID: 24360821 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.10.021].
  • 9Mama KR, Gaynor JS, Harvey RC, Robertson SA, Koenig RL, Cozzi EM. Multicenter clinical evalu- ation of a multi-dose formulation of propofol in the dog. BMC Vet Res 2013. 9:261 [PMID: 24359719 DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-261].
  • 10Wang H, Yang C, Zhang B, Xia Y, Liu H, Liang H. Ef- ficacy of target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil with high frequency jet ventilation in fibre- optic bronchoscopy. Singapore Med J 2013. 54:689-694 [PMID: 24356755 DOI: 10.1112/j.jcrc.2013.54.012].

引证文献3

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部