期刊文献+

舒芬太尼复合丙泊酚静脉麻醉在胸外科手术中的应用探讨 被引量:12

Observation of Doses of Sufentanil and Propofol for Intravenous Anesthesia in Thoracic Surgery
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨在胸外科手术中舒芬太尼复合丙泊酚静脉麻醉的临床麻醉效果。方法:选择胸外科择期手术患者60例,ASA I或II级,分为观察组(舒芬太尼复合丙泊酚)及对照组(芬太尼复合丙泊酚)进行静脉全麻手术,观察两组患者在麻醉诱导前(T0)、诱导后(T1)、气管插管时(T2)、手术开始时(T3)、切皮后5 min(T4)和术毕(T5)HR、BP的变化,并记录患者的自主呼吸恢复时间、苏醒时间、拔管时间、定向力恢复时间以及对术后患者进行视觉模拟法疼痛(VAS)评分。结果:与对照组相比,发现观察组麻醉及手术过程中血液动力学更加稳定,自主呼吸时间、苏醒时间、拔管时间、定向力恢复时间均缩短,有统计学差异(P<0.05),且观察组的术后2.5 h内的疼痛感明显下降。结论:舒芬太尼在胸外科手术中的麻醉效果优于芬太尼,更值得推广应用于临床麻醉中。 Objective: To investigate the clinical anesthetic effect of doses of sufentanil with propofol for intravenous anesthesia in thoracic surgery. Method: 60 thoracic surgery patients, ASA I or II, were random- ly divided into observation group as doses of sufentanil with propofol and control group as doses of fentanyl with propofol for intravenous anesthesia, then index of HR and BP were recorded at the time of To , T1 , T2, T3 , T4 and T5, and the patient's breathing recovery time, recovery time, extubation time, orientation recov- ery time were recorded and postoperative pain was scored by VAS. Result: Compared with the control group, hemodynamics in the observation group was more stable during the anesthesia and surgery, breathing recovery time, recovery time, extubation time, orientation recovery time were shortened with significant difference ( P〈0.05 ), and postoperative pain 2.5 hours after the surgery was decreased significantly. Con- clusion: The anesthetic effect of sufentanil is superior to fentanyl in thoracic surgery, which is much more worthy of promotion and utilized in clinical anesthesia.
出处 《河北医学》 CAS 2012年第12期1676-1679,共4页 Hebei Medicine
关键词 胸外科手术 舒芬太尼 芬太尼 丙泊酚 麻醉效果 Thoracic surgery Sufentanil Fentanyl Propofol Anesthetic effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1刘鲲鹏,廖旭,薛富善.舒芬太尼的药理学和临床应用[J].中国医药导刊,2005,7(6):454-457. 被引量:229
  • 2于爱兰,傅志俭,张宗旺,蔡兴志.舒芬太尼预防全麻诱导期机体应激反应[J].山东医药,2006,46(26):59-60. 被引量:13
  • 3Bailey JM, Schwieger IM, Hug CC Jr. Evaluation of sufentanil analgesia obtained by a computer controlled infusion for car- diac surgery [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 1993,76 ( 6 ) : 247 -248.
  • 4Ledowski T, Bein B, Hanss R, et al. Neuroendocrine stress re onse and heart rate variability: a comparison of total intrave- nous versus balanced anesthesia[ J]. Aneth Analg,2005,101 (6) :1700-1705.
  • 5Sharer SL, Varvet JR. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and rational opioid selection [ J ]. Anesthsiology, 1991,74 ( 1 ) :53-63.
  • 6Parkanrattana U, Suksomping S. Comparison of sufentanil and fentanyl for surgical repair of congenital cardiac defects[ J]. Med Asso Thai,2002,85 (suppl 3) :807-814.
  • 7徐叔云,卞如濂,陈修.药理实验方法学[M].第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.1049-1050.
  • 8贾志,贾浩.舒芬太尼复合丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉在胸科手术中的应用观察[J].山东医药,2010,50(26):101-102. 被引量:10

二级参考文献30

  • 1张晓琴,蔡英敏,薛荣亮,赵莉.舒芬太尼在老年患者全麻诱导中对血液动力学的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(8):525-526. 被引量:88
  • 2Edwards ND,Alford AM,Dobson PM,et al.Myocardial ischaemia during tracheal intubation and extubation[J].Br J Anaesth,1994,73(4):537-539.
  • 3Ledowski T,Bein B,Hanss R,et al.Neuroendocrine stress response and heart rate variability:a comparison of total intravenous versus balanced anesthesia[J].Aneth Analg,2005,101(6):1700-1705.
  • 4Smith C,McEwan AL,Jhaveri R,et al.The interaction of fenta-nyl on the CP50 of propofol fer loss of consciousness and skin incision[J].Anesthesiology,1994,81(4):820-828.
  • 5Martorano P,Facco E,Falzetti G,et al.Spectral entropy assessment with auditory evoked potential in neuroanestesia[J].Clin Neurophysiol,2007,118(3):505-512.
  • 6Howie MB, Smith DF, Reiley TE, et al. Postoperative course after sufentanil or fentanyl anesthesia for coronary artery surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 1991:5:485-489.
  • 7Philbin DM, Rosow CE, Schneider RC, et al. Fentanyl and sufentanil anesthesia revisited: how much is enough?Anesthesiology, 1990:73:5-11.
  • 8Bailey PL, Streisand JB, East KA, et al. Differences in magnitude and duration of opioid-induced respiratory depression and analgesia with fentanyl and sufentanil. Anesth Analg, 1990:70:8-15.
  • 9Bowdle TA, Ward R J. Induction of anesthesia with small doses of sufentanil or fentanyl: dose versus EEG response,speed of onset and thiopental requirement.Anesthesiology,1989:70:26-30.
  • 10Sperry R J, Bailey PL, Reichman MV, et al. Fentanyl and sufentanil increase intracranial pressure in head trauma patients. Anesthesiology, 1992:77:416-420.

共引文献246

同被引文献82

引证文献12

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部